🏀 KuBuckets Archive

Read-only archive of KuBuckets.com (2013-2025)
Charlie Black - Uniform
Jan 28, 2015 08:56 PM #1

From Rock Chalk Weekly. http://contentviewer.adobe.com/s/Rock%20Chalk%20Weekly/d9963474-d31e-562e-b24a-2108e9feee08/Rock%20Chalk%20Weekly%20Vol%201%20Issue%2021/ALookBack.html#page_lastPage ↗

Hope it works.

Jan 28, 2015 09:00 PM #2

@RockChalkinTexas

Does this help?
!Shirt.png ↗

Jan 28, 2015 09:01 PM #3

@JayHawkFanToo

THANKS. That's it. I am clueless on how to get that stuff to show.

There's also a good article on Brannen Greene. It is called "Deep in his DNA, Sophomore Brannen Greene possesses a skill many athletes lack."

Jan 28, 2015 09:12 PM #4

@RockChalkinTexas

KU Athletics posted the pic on Facebook. Looks like they did not want those shirts to slip off the shorts...:)

Jan 28, 2015 09:21 PM #5

What would have happened if Doug Gottlieb had worn these backwards?

Jan 28, 2015 09:22 PM #6

Hey you, You without a number! Tuck your shirt in!

Jan 28, 2015 09:22 PM #7

@JayHawkFanToo
I'm sure happy that "style" was gone long before I stepped on a court.

Jan 28, 2015 09:28 PM #8

@JayhawkRock78

You don't like the built-in "Depend" holder? :) :) :)

Jan 28, 2015 09:28 PM #9

I wouldn't mind seeing Kelly in those shorty shorts:-)

The Austin paper has a weekly power poll. Here's what they put about us and Texas.

No 1. Jayhawks rule roost again after dealing out capital punishment to Longhorns in Austin.

No. 5. Guess we will have to wait another year, or 10, for the Longhorns to unseat King Kansas.

ROCK CHALK!

Jan 28, 2015 09:34 PM #10

@RockChalkinTexas they are sexy!!!!

Jan 28, 2015 10:35 PM #11

@RockChalkinTexas You're a female, right?

Jan 28, 2015 10:53 PM #12

@JayHawkFanToo Why doesnt KU's 2 Helm's National Champ wins count for total of N.C's? Just because it changed to the NCAA, KU still has 5 National Championships. Most profiles or whatever say KU has 3 N.C's
PS. Those old Uni's look really funny.

Jan 28, 2015 11:18 PM #13

@wrwlumpy Yes. Something wrong with that? Everyone fawned all over the red head longhorn girl last week.

Jan 28, 2015 11:19 PM #14

It's OK, you can fawn. If I was gay, I'd pick him too.

Jan 28, 2015 11:21 PM #15

@wrwlumpy I don't know about @RockChalkinTexas but @Crimsonorblue22 is a female. And I thought she had better taste than that. Or maybe that was sarcasm.

Jan 28, 2015 11:21 PM #16

@brooksmd ha ha!!!

Jan 28, 2015 11:22 PM #17

@Crimsonorblue22 I do like the shoes.

Jan 28, 2015 11:23 PM #18

@brooksmd as I look at that guy, I bet he was a "looker" in his day.

Jan 28, 2015 11:24 PM #19

@brooksmd are those converse?

Jan 28, 2015 11:26 PM #20

@Crimsonorblue22 Looks like Cons to me with the round emblem. As for him being a "looker" in his day, I'll defer that to your opinion.

Jan 28, 2015 11:27 PM #21

@brooksmd doesn't look like gma Hudy worked w/him.

Jan 28, 2015 11:29 PM #22

@Crimsonorblue22 :laughing:

Jan 28, 2015 11:33 PM #23

Why don't the stomachs of today look like Charlie Blacks? - ...as I walk out of Denny's after a grand Slam...

Jan 28, 2015 11:36 PM #24

@RockChalkinTexas My sister is also on this site . Sorry if some of us and myself come off as Chauvinistic in our writing. By the way, do you know the Red Head in Texas and could you get her # for HEM?

Jan 28, 2015 11:42 PM #25

@wrwlumpy good one!!!

Jan 28, 2015 11:43 PM #26

@wrwlumpy is that why you call yourself lumpy?

Jan 29, 2015 04:43 AM #27

I WANT A PAIR OF THOSE SHOES ASAP!

THOSE WOULD BE A BEYOND COOL RETRO LOOK!!!!!

Jan 29, 2015 04:44 AM #28

@jaybate-1.0 I like them too

Jan 29, 2015 04:45 AM #29

@jaybate-1.0 jb, I thought they were Cons, but looking on the net it looks like Keds and a couple others used that round label on the side. Can you tell what they are?

Jan 29, 2015 04:45 AM #30

@Crimsonorblue22

Wouldn't they be cool to see adidas recycle with some upto date materials.

Jan 29, 2015 04:46 AM #31

@jaybate-1.0 yes!!! What did we have in the 1920's?

Jan 29, 2015 04:46 AM #32

@brooksmd

Beats me. I've never seen Converse like that.

Jan 29, 2015 04:48 AM #33

@jaybate-1.0 Not the same but these are supposed to be 1922 reproductions.

http://www.doubleselect.com/2007/12/26/converse-b-10/ ↗

Jan 29, 2015 04:48 AM #34

@Crimsonorblue22

The shoes look like canvas with perhaps leather trim where the eyelets are for the laces. The soles were probably real rubber from rubber trees at that point. But Brooks may know better than me on this. I didn't realize Keds were made then.

Jan 29, 2015 04:50 AM #35

@brooksmd

Just outrageously cool pic link. THANKS so much for that @brooksmd

Jan 29, 2015 04:52 AM #36

@brooksmd

Texture on the sole is very interesting, if you enlarge the image on your screen.

Jan 29, 2015 04:59 AM #37

@jaybate-1.0 https://www.flickr.com/photos/carlylehold/8028193371/ ↗