Which Big 12 teams benefit most from the 30-second shot clock?
It might make more sense to ask which teams will struggle most with the quicker pace.
Just thinking out loud here, it seems that old Huggy Bear's Mountaineers will benefit the most. You can bet he is licking at the chops to get going on this year. His full-court press is really going to make it tough for teams to get off a good shot on a quicker clock. And with that problem, it will also force teams to push harder through the press, committing more TOs in the process, too.
We are fortunate to have this WUG ball to work out the pace issues. Making us use a 24-second clock will later make a 30-second clock feel like an eternity. If we didn't have this extra season to work it out I believe I would have us near the bottom in our league for struggling through the pace pickup. Self's game is half court offense, and traditionally, he likes to see his guys work the ball until the final seconds of the shot clock to get a good shot off. The mindset moving forward will have to be different. The mindset now will be: "take the first good shot we have, unless you can directly assist for even a better shot!"
Moving forward, we may see a shift in Self's priorities and see him rewarding PT based more on offensive attributes over defensive attributes. With a quicker clock, players with less defensive skills will have to perform it 5-seconds less (per possession) than last year. And the players with more offensive skills will need those skills to get a shot off 5-seconds quicker. At least, that is the way it appears on paper.
Back to our league.... If Fred was still at ISU I would put ISU up there with WVU at the top of our league for teams with the biggest + on the quicker clock. But I'm not so sure now. The Cyclones will be a mystery team this year. Lots of great offensive talent but a new coach and a learning process for everyone. I still place them high because they will be stocked with quality offensive players and many will be veterans.
I'm thinking Texas might suffer with a shortened clock. Shaka's first year and he'll have to learn to communicate quickly to his players and get them to perform with a faster pace. I would think that a shorter clock will hurt players like Ridley, unless he has dropped more weight in the off-season.
Baylor seems more like a wash. Not sure how Drew adjusts or if he needs to. His teams always seem a bit undisciplined so I'm doubting they have a problem getting off quick shots.
Oklahoma always has Buddy to get off a shot whenever he wants to. He can put it up right over anyone in the league. I think we need to see what new talent they bring in to see how they will react to a faster paced clock. Last year, they didn't need a lot of time to get off their shots. I'm predicting them closer to the top with WVU.
OSU seems like a team that might be hit hard by the quicker pace. Again, it matters who they have recruited, but I can see them being rushed often on their shots.
Texas Tech and TCU seem closer to the bottom because they just lack enough competitive players. They may fall victim to attrition, too.
KSU... well... they look like they are going to stink regardless of the shot clock. I put them at the very bottom even though Weber usually does a decent job coaching up the players he does have.
My final assessment, teams with the most positive gain first:
WVU
ISU
KU
OU
BU
UT
OSU
TCU
TT
KSU