@DoubleDD
I never said that whites don't have things happen to them in encounters with police. They do. And when that happens, it's just as wrong.
I said above that Michael Brown was wrong for what he did. But here's the thing that I think you are missing about this whole episode.
As a result of the Brown shooting, even though he was wrong, it revealed a systematic problem with the Ferguson police department and municipal court system. Have you read the DOJ report on their investigation? The report details many unconstitutional stops, arrests and other harassment that the Ferguson PD carried out as a regular practice. The actions of the officer in the case of Michael Brown were justified, but when the light shone on the Ferguson PD, evidence of unconstitutional behavior were rampant. A sampling:
-
In October 2012, police officers pulled over an African-American man who had lived in Ferguson for 16 years, claiming that his passenger-side brake light was broken. The driver happened to have replaced the light recently and knew it to be functioning properly. Nonetheless, according to the man’s written complaint, one officer stated, “let’s see how many tickets you’re going to get,” while a second officer tapped his Electronic Control Weapon (“ECW”) on the roof of the man’s car. The officers wrote the man a citation for “tail
light/reflector/license plate light out.” They refused to let the man show them that his car’s
equipment was in order, warning him, “don’t you get out of that car until you get to your house.” The man, who believed he had been racially profiled, was so upset that he went to the police station that night to show a sergeant that his brakes and license plate light worked.
-
At times, the constitutional violations are even more blatant. An African-American man
recounted to us an experience he had while sitting at a bus stop near Canfield Drive. According to the man, an FPD patrol car abruptly pulled up in front of him. The officer inside, a patrol lieutenant, rolled down his window and addressed the man:
Lieutenant: Get over here.
Bus Patron: Me?
Lieutenant: Get the f*** over here. Yeah, you.
Bus Patron: Why? What did I do?
Lieutenant: Give me your ID.
Bus Patron: Why?
Lieutenant: Stop being a smart ass and give me your ID.
The lieutenant ran the man’s name for warrants. Finding none, he returned the ID and said, “get the hell out of my face.”
-
This incident is also consistent with a pattern of suspicionless, legally unsupportable
stops we found documented in FPD’s records, described by FPD as “ped checks” or “pedestrian checks.” Though at times officers use the term to refer to reasonable-suspicion-based pedestrian stops, or “Terry stops,” they often use it when stopping a person with no objective, articulable suspicion.
-
In another case, officers responded to a call about a man selling drugs by stopping a group of six African-American youths who, due to their numbers, did not match the facts of the call. The youths were “detained and ped checked.”
-
Frequently, officers arrest people for conduct that plainly does not meet the
elements of the cited offense. For example, in November 2013, an officer approached five
African-American young people listening to music in a car. Claiming to have smelled
marijuana, the officer placed them under arrest for disorderly conduct based on their “gathering in a group for the purposes of committing illegal activity.” The young people were detained and charged—some taken to jail, others delivered to their parents—despite the officer finding no marijuana, even after conducting an inventory search of the car.
That's just a sampling. It should be noted that the police in Ferguson were using pedestrian ("ped checks") checks even though this activity is an unconstitutional stop. Michael Brown was wrong, yes, but it the things that the people of Ferguson complained about were found to be true - there were systematic abuses within the police force.
I appreciate what @nuleafjhawk says, but the trouble is that discrimination happens. Does it happen all the time. No. But the thing with discrimination is that it might not be noticeable unless it happens to you. I have a co-worker that goes through hell when we business travel. I never really thought about it until seeing what she has to go through on literally every single business trip. I'm sure that type of thing happens all the time, but until it happened literally right in front of my face, I didn't see it. I couldn't recognize it.
Like the story I told above, until my roommates actually heard about it from me, they didn't believe that type of thing happened.
What is happening at MU is a result of the administration ignoring small incidents and letting them fester. Now, it has exploded. They just arrested a student at another school for making a terrorist threat against the campus in Columbia.
Currently in the US, there is a DOJ investigation going on about sexual assaults on college campuses. KU is one of the campuses being investigated. Are the women that have complained about the unwanted groping and other behavior seeking special rights? Of course not. They want to be treated with decency and dignity as a member of that community. If university leaders don't want to do that, and root out those who are perpetrating these types of behavior, they should be replaced.
There is a similar problem with race. Not just black, but also with Latinos and a growing issue with middle eastern individuals. That, too should be rooted out. To some, it may just be isolated incidents. But the problem with hate is that if you don't root out the isolated incidents, it becomes a systematic problem.
At MU, the football team isn't saying "make one of us president of the university." They are saying, select a president that cares about all students, and won't look the other way when we are being mistreated. It's not special treatment to not be subjected to abuse.
@dylans what has happened to your brother is terrible, and unfortunately, is a problem everywhere. Some police and DA's see things a certain way and make assumptions about a crime. That attitude must also be rooted out. Don't lose hope though. The system is flawed, but, hopefully, getting better.
You make a good point about scoring highest in school, but it isn't about two parent homes. It is about stability at home. For two parent homes that are unstable, those kids do not do well in school because the instability at home makes it difficult for them to concentrate at school, hard to sleep, inconsistent eating, etc. When there is stability, whether in a single parent home or whatever, the child can reach their full potential.