Well ok for the 2nd time this season bad pub being put out surrounding the Basketball team. - -First Bragg which as we all know was proven TOTALLY false, and now this with SURPOSEDELY five of our teams player being witnesses in some sort of way to this alleged rape. Let me relay what I saw and what I'm thinking right now:
What I read & it troubles me just a little. - -What I am reading is, the people in the know, or dealing with this situation says - - - the reason it wasn't reported like any other crime was it likely would of received extensive media coverage both regionally and Nationally due to the fact the KU Basketball team lives at the facility, and due to the number of allegations Nationally involving student-athletes and sexual assault cases.
Now this bothers me to an extent , Now let me say I DO NOT believe any of the players had any part of this alleged rape - -I mean seriously , Frank? Lightfoot ? Vang ? just not seeing it - -BUT? - - they say they are afraid of the media and exposure - - the question is KU players or not , should this NOT be brought to light? - -Is this surpose to be swept under the rug? - -Will it not , which it already has made National exposure as it's all over the news anyways - -But whether it's NOW or LATER will it not get all kinds of media attention? - -just like the Louisville situation? and to a different extent not the same BUT just like the North Carolina grade situation? are those not STILL getting National media exposure? -I dunno maybe it's me , maybe I'm looking at this wrong, but when I hear this it just seems little regard for the alleged victim. Seems like caring less for her regard and more for the accused. - - Again I don't think or feel there is ANY chance in hell any of our players were directly involved in this , but the question for me is still - -WHY shouldn't this be brought out NOW ?
It says the Campus Security policy and Campus crime statistics require university police to maintain a written daily crime log within TWO business days of being reported to police. - -BUT there are eceptions
It says institutions can withhold information from the log IF it would jeopardize an ongoing criminal investigation OR THE SAFETY of an individual, or cause a suspect to flee, or evade detection, or result in the destruction of evidence. Then at whatever point the "adverse effect " of concern is no longer likely to occur the institution is required to add the incident to the crime log.
Ok, my question is, whether they list it NOW or it's released Now - OR later - - do they really think that the " adverse effect " -will just go away? - - If this turns out to be false , even if they wait - -which they are , if this is another false accusation , which I'm not say it is, or it's not BUT do they think that IF it is that the danger to this girl is Gone? -OR if it's true do they think that the danger for retalitation in some form to THAT person will be gone? I just don't see how the consequences would be any less however this turns out. - -IF this did happen, you don't think that your NOT going to have some really PISSED of relatives or whoever that this has happened to a 16 yr old girl? - - If it didn't happen same thing you don't think she isn't going to. have to worry about retaliation in some way shape or form? - -No Matter when it gets revealed it's going to get ALL KINDS OF MEDIA attention - -exposure Local and Nationally - already has , just very confusing - not good pub for the boys , just another distraction - -hoping for better days - - ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY