Motivation VS Competitiveness
There is a difference between motivation and competitiveness. Motivation is the fuel for energy, focus and execution leading up to and during the big event. Most of motivation isn't experienced by the fans because it is in use before the event... in the gym, video room, team room, etc. Motivation helps babysit players, keeps them directed away from bad avenues outside of their sport and focused on the big picture of winning.
Competitiveness comes into play during the game. The court becomes a battleground, and both sides are soldiers in war. Competitive behavior is more of a personality trait. Motivation is more situational.
It is important to know the difference between these terms, because a team (or players) can be competitive but not motivated, or the other way around, a team or player(s) can be motivated, but not competitive.
I once had a coach that I would put his success up against any coach in America. No, he didn't coach at UCLA, or Kansas or North Carolina. But the man could coach and had the record to prove it. The team I played on for him posed his biggest challenge. We started the year in losing fashion, and his coaching reputation was being challenged.
I was born a competitor. I was driven any time I walked on a court, or even in a supermarket aisle. I was once thrown out of a supermarket for playing competitive nerfball on their toy aisle. So I was a hard case to teach when it came to motivation, because I brought it to every game wrapped into my competitiveness, naturally, but I wasn't prepared to understand its full meaning. I wasn't prepared to make the sacrifices needed outside of the game court.
My coach explained to me the difference of motivation and competitiveness, and from that point on, I lifted my game to a much higher form of play by working hard when not on the game court.
Coach said, "motivation can come from both sides of the plow horse. A plow horse will pull forward trying to bite a carrot off a string, or a plow horse will pull forward because the farmer smacks him with a whip! And the plow horse will pull hardest when being encouraged from both sides."
At the time, I was young and felt I knew everything. After suffering a big dose of losses and watching our beloved coach take a hit on his coaching reputation, I finally reached the level of humility necessary to learn a lesson. I was a competitor, but I had nothing motivating me outside of the 40-minute game.
We ended up salvaging a respectable record that year, and the following three seasons we dominated our league. Every player lifted his game way beyond their previous expectations because we all worked hard outside of the game court.
Coach Self has mentioned how this team has a "laid-back personality." What can we conclude from that statement? All of our guys have talent. Have all of our guys been motivated at one time of their lives in order to build their game? Are all of our guys truly competitive in nature?
Motivation
I believe all our guys have a decent amount of motivation at work. They show up on time for practice, listen to coaches, work hard, and seem to be keeping themselves out of trouble when off the court. Most of motivation we (fans) can't see because we don't have the opportunity to sit in at practice and in the weight room and other facilities. If we did, I am sure we would see a difference between players. Some seem to have a bigger carrot in front of them, and some are receiving Self's whip more than others. The results are becoming positive; the fields are being plowed!
Competitiveness
Competitiveness is what we get to experience for 40-minutes each game. Competitiveness is what my FLOOR BURN AWARD is all about. I'm offering a motivational carrot to the player who is competing the hardest each game.
Competitiveness is the area where I'm not 100% sold on this team. People who have the competitive personality trait are rarely considered "laid-back." I'm not the only one who sees competitiveness as a possible issue with this team. Many of you have complained during this year for a lack of hustle. Kevin Young has been sorely missed on several occasions!
Motivation is treatable, but can we tweak competitiveness? Is it the same thing if our guys are instructed to go down and slide for loose balls or if the desire comes naturally? Personally, I think there is a difference. I think a player who is not extremely competitive but instructed to go for balls will go sliding for balls, but then what? Every loose ball is a different situation, and the player that wants it the most wins. Being instructed to go for ball is basically programming a robot to accomplish something. But a robot will never take the ball away from a man who can't stand to lose. There is something to the famous quote, "it isn't the size of the dog in the fight, but more the size of the fight in the dog!"
I've learned my lessons on motivation. But I don't have a clue if competitiveness can be taught because I've never lacked it. Maybe some of you can add to this conversation by sharing your input on competitiveness.
Can this team learn to play more competitively?
Can motivation be used to build competitiveness?
I see plenty of both carrot and bullwhip in play here. Can either be used to make these guys fight harder?
I have no idea... because even today, if I see a nerfball loose on aisle 7, I'm diving for it!