@Texas-Hawk-10
This is very simple.
The Big Ten can make the most money by adding the Big 12 intact and becoming the Big 20-24.
One annual playoff game between the winner of the Northern conference (old Big Ten champ) and Southern conference (old B12 champ) solves the problem of getting to 4 power conferences easily.
But deep regional political economy issues stand in the way.
So: if the Trump coalition of Exxon-Mercer-KOCH has successfully divided Texas between Exxon-MERCER-KOCH vs. the Bushista-Brit oilers, then KU alone, or an Okie school and KU, could be cherry picked INTO the B10 to increase TRUMP coalition influence in B10 regional political economics.
But how the TRUMP COALITION fares depends on how the Rothschilds, the Vatican and the combined Black Nobility banking with the Rothschilds in London want the Trump coalition to play out. If they want the Trump Coalition to prevail, then what happens to the Texas-Oklahoma-Kansas oil and gas alliance built by the old Anglo-American alliance will follow the preferences of new Exxon-Mercer-Koch alliance. But if theRothschilds just wanted to shake things up a little to get the war for their former gas reserves in Iran back, well standing pat may be most likely.
There is still great clout in keeping the Texas-Oklahoma-Kansas oil and gas alliance in tact.
But man, oh, man, would Exxon-Mercer -Koch like to get their hands on the Great Lakes water and the massive oil and gas reserves under the Great Lakes? I bet yes. Water and oil remain the quest all over the world including USA. If moving KU, or the whole Big 12 into the BIG TEN improves that long term goal, it's a done deal. Not if not.