@wissox No, just that it’s an underground lake with less than .50” recharge per year. And there are too many irrigation wells pulling 24” per year out of it. Basically what each well pumps would take 20-48 years to replace. There isn’t irrigation on each acre thankfully, but there is too much for the recharge rate.
If Colorado would allow the Arkansas river to flow it would help, but they don’t. There was a period when the Arkansas river flowed for most of the summer and the irrigation wells improved quiet a bit more than you would imagine along that basin. Colorado has too many Californians (and others) that have moved in and they need the water for their burgeoning population.
The Army corps of engineers has a plan to build aqueducts bringing water back west. The plan was drawn up in the ‘80s and was a $3 billion project back then, so $10-15 billion now? It called for a 10,000 acre lake to be built in NE Kansas - great for rec. Then only when the Missouri River could maintain a navigable flow would water be siphoned off into an aqueduct and pumped uphill thru a series of locks. Ultimately it was to discharge into a creek bed near the Colorado line that has a fault line in it and the creek would only flow a few miles before filtering down to the aquifer. Of course to satisfy the masses it would have to swing by Wichita and allow them to draw water from it as well.
It sounds horribly expensive, but ultimately the economic impact of that water would pay big dividends.