@truehawk93 Of course, I didn't say Self was the only one.
So, in one paragraph, I think you highlight the hypocrisy that gets floated around sometimes on this topic. You state that "all coaches" are aware of shoe companies' influence, you day you "doubt that is Self is the only coach" involved in this stuff, you seemingly "accuse" coach K, but you react with righteous indignation related to discussions regarding coach Self. Come on.
You may or may not remember, but my biggest issue is Bill Self's definitive statement in November where he said that he was aware of no improper benefits given to KU BB players by third parties. Unequivocal.
I suggested he might have given a much more grey statement, acknowledging the nature of the recruiting game, stating commitment to clean recruiting, etc. But when you're unequivocal, you are out on a limb.
This is certainly all just accusation and discussion, and opinion.
Also, the judge didn't remind the "grand jury", he reminded the jury, that the defendants were on trial. Not Adidas. The individual defendants, Gatto, et. al. Which, of course, when they are on trial, he/she should remind the jury of that. And that is why in such a trial all the info one might have on coaches doesn't come out, because the judge limits what is presented based on relevance and a number of other factors.