🏀 KuBuckets Archive

Read-only archive of KuBuckets.com (2013-2025)
Kong
52 posts
Mid range shooting • Nov 21, 2014 12:51 AM

@ justanother

I understand that it is statistically not the most advantageous shot to take, but there are a lot of factors that go into that. Generally the shot is taken in motion decreasing the effectiveness of the shot. However, if you don't have shooters who can hit the three with regularity and the lane is shut down, it has to be a better percentage shot than what we have been doing and with the personnel that we currently have.

@ Highelite

"My main issue is that you can have both, and you can scheme for both; and neither will devalue the other."

Exactly!

To both, I think I saw a shot chart someplace and the number of midrange shots made was 4 of 9. I would argue that given the number of shots taken and the percentages made the other night, I think one would be hard pressed to say that it wouldn't have been a valuable tool. If nothing else it would have given Kentucky something else to defend.

My points isn't to rely solely on the mid range, but to use it as a weapon in the arsenal. We have not been a historically strong three point shooting team. So, to rely on that tool when our strengths lie elsewhere, seems like a recipe for disaster.

Mid range shooting • Nov 20, 2014 09:27 PM

Two things stood out during the Kentucky game.

The first was our apparent inability to drive and dish. We drove and we drove and we drove but nearly every one of those drives ended with an attempted shot against a taller, more athletic defense that had collapsed down upon them.

The second was the lack of mid range shots. We saw attempted layups swatted out routinely and we saw pressured threes from time to time.

Did anyone else feel that a game such as that was set up to be a mid range shooting clinic. Drive the ball and hit the open guy at the elbow or diagonal for a shot off the box. Is it that people don't teach those shots anymore due to the hype surrounding dunks and raining threes? Is it that coaches feel that the percentages are more favorable for a set three or a dunk than the old diagonal mid range shot?

First time poster is curious what others think about the lack of mid range shooting in the game and whether it would have been effective in this game in particular.