In recent years, it has become obvious that KU and UK have been competing head-to-head in men's basketball, both on the court and off.
When UK created luxury dorm rooms to house their basketball team, KU felt the need to respond by approving the construction of their version of housing luxury for Jayhawk players. Was it done in order to remain on the same competitive level? Or was it just one school playing copy cat off another?
Now the targets have been set to upgrading basketball venues. For some time, Lexington town counsel members (along with the Lexington Center Corporation) have been pushing an upgrade to Rupp Arena that would create the most-expensive building in the State of Kentucky, spending over $350 million to accomplish it. Rupp Arena would be encased in glass, with a massive, artistic crystal entombment of beauty and function.
But now it appears that promoters of the project have bit off more than the State of Kentucky can chew, including a choking of support from the UK administration.
Meanwhile, back in Lawrence, the beat moves on in development of the DeBruce Center, the KU response to the UK proposed development (with some similarity in looks) and also the new housing for the recent acquisition of the original rules for basketball.
http://www.gouldevans.com/portfolio/ku-debruce-center ↗
The developers in Lawrence seem to have a more-realistic approach to glass improvements. The KU project will cost a mere $18 million.... pennies in comparison to the Kansas counterparts in Kentucky.
So the arms race moves on... and while it seems the movement in Lexington has come to a standstill, few believe their upgrade development of Rupp Arena will die, but it may have to be redesigned to a more modest proportion.
If the Rupp development comes down to, say, a $100 million improvement, still trumping the DeBruce Center in total mass, will Kansas feel the need to respond with a further addition to stay competitive?
I was around for the cold war pitting America against Russia. We built a bomb shelter in our backyard. It served us well against the threat of tornadoes. But the bombs never came.
How far will this current "blue blood arms race" go? Until one school collapses under the financial or political pressure?
What is left to develop? Where do we go from here?
Are there other basketball blue bloods entering the race?
I guess since we refuse to update needed infrastructure, like our bridges and roads, we should look upon any development positively because it puts people to work.
I'm not sure I'll feel that way if another bridge collapses. Perhaps the issue here is where the development funds come from... public or private sources.