@wrwlumpy
Every picture of Cos makes me sad now. I keep hoping allegations will all be refuted I looked up to him from the time I heard his first comedy album when I was 8 at neighbor's house on their Stereo HiFi spinning a 33 1/3 rpm vinyl of young Bill--early 60s. Never connected with his TV show much, but knew it was doing a lot of good for a lot of persons. Every comedian, Richard Pryor said, if I recall correctly, is working from a huge painful hole at the center of himself that was created by some tragedy in his childhood. They are all that way I believe. So since they all don't do what Cos reputedly did once he got famous, we can apparently infer that his reputed problem tracks to what he may have let fame do to him. Can't let this one go any easier than I can let the priests off the hook. God will have to forgive him, if he were proven guilty. I couldn't. I have great sympathy for him, but not nearly as much as I have for his reputed victims.
John Cheney? He appeared to be one of the guys that turned the game into thug ball. But what I admired about him was his willingness to fight for his players. Like Self recruits characters, Cheney appeared to recruit guys that often had never had anyone willing to fight for them. I believe that was his secret. He appeared to know how much it meant to have someone actually not just believe in you, but fight for your chance to make it. It is such a big difference.
Cheney appeared to try to intimidate any opposing coach. He seemed to feel he owed it to his players, who were apparently kids scrambling against long odds in a society that was often stacked against them. I liked that about him. And I would have taken a metaphorical baseball bat to him in a game in a pico second, because I feel exactly the same way about persons I try to help. Nothing personal. I just would have tried to KO him before the game started, same as he would have me.
John Calipari at UMass appeared to believe he could coach a slick game against Cheney with some of Cal's players (one that in the end led to vacated seasons), and Cheney reputedly decided to show the green coach that you don't slide things by a Philly guy. Cheney and Cal reportedly squared off. Both were reputedly held back from fighting and I believe both men were embarrassed at how they had acted...but only to some extent.
Cal was quoted in an article when he took over Memphis, if I recall correctly, that he was embarrassed about squaring off with Cheney on a floor, but Cal said he knew that if he had let Cheney bully him off the floor, his players would have quit on him and his career as a recruiter and coach would have been sunk. If I recall correctly, he said I couldn't ask my players to fight for me, if I weren't willing to fight for them. He implied that he probably would have gotten his clock cleaned by Cheney, but that he didn't care if he lost. He just knew he could not back down and face his players. Cheney seemed the same way, but Cheney was probably too old school ever to even talk about it.
I don't ever want a coach to fight another coach. It is the antithesis of what basketball is about. But I also don't want any coach to back down from another coach trying to bully him either.
I like Bill Self's approach, because he appears hard nosed, and unafraid of opposing coaches. But at the same time he appears to make them pay by outsmarting them as soon as they try to bully them, rather than waste a lot of time jawing at them.
But John Cheney (born 1932) came from a time and a place where things were different. Cheney, interestingly, was reputedly born in Florida and went to Bethune-Cookman and came north to coach in a Philly high school before coaching at Cheyney State in Pennsylvania, where he won an NAIA title before taking over at Temple. Cheney was apparently a hard case. Period. But his players reputedly knew he was fighting for them, leading them, not using them, IMHO. It was why Temple was always a little different kind of team, when Cheney coached them. There was a deep contract between he and his players. Cheney was NOT a saint. He appeared a fighter. And tough guy looking for an edge all the time. The Philly 'hood culture was not Cheney's culture as far as I can tell. It was what his players came from and he was the guy that had grown up in something even tougher down south--Jim Crow culture. There was no BS with him and his players. He apparently coached the zone, because in the zone groups of guys could gang up and maul an offensive player. Temple basketball was during his day something like what Izzo and Michigan State are today. Bring your brass knuckles to play, because they are bringing theirs. And if they got you down, they went ahead and kicked you in the metaphorical head. But Cheney built teams. And they played a certain way. And you had to want it bad to win, because they did.
The game survives guys like Cheney and Izzo, but only if the right way guys fight to save it.
But guys like Cheney and Izzo help a lot of young men that need someone to fight for them to make them realize they can make it in the world.
life isn't simple.