@KUinLA - Hang in there. Bang away at what you believe. I've read your posts for years, and have enjoyed your candor and direct approach. And as you know, you and I have not always agreed. But you are right on target here.
I have found, sometimes, the best way to approach a post one might see as a touch rough is to first analyze whether the content is correct.
Regarding Kentucky, our game was clearly feed the post and what Self said it was, drive and dish. We did both -- we fed the post and we drove (but did not dish). Both were plainly evident against UK.
After the game, Self gave us the famous line about game planning:
“This game plan crap that everybody talks about; this isn’t football,” Self said. “We play to our strengths, and you don’t just change offenses because the other team is tall. Our whole deal early on was drive to pass. And we didn’t; we drove to shoot.”
If we can agree that throwing it into the post is a bad strategy against UK, who made that choice heading into the UK game? Coach Self.
Who, after the UK game, said "you just don't change offenses because the other team is tall"? Coach Self.
Who, after the UK game, mocked game planning? Coach Self.
I'm not saying you change offenses. I'm saying you adjust your scheme to take advantage of your assets.
I'm saying you do exactly what coach Self said that you do -- using coach Self's exact words -- "“We play to our strengths ... " And that is all @KUinLA is saying, as well.
However, while we here at kubuckets.com had already posted multiple times regarding focusing this team on the perimeter game before the season even started, coach Self chose his tried and true. And really, I have no issue with that early in the season. No way to know, for sure, that it was not going to work. We could only speculate (of course now, it is not speculation).
Now, cast your crimson and blue colored glasses aside, and ask yourself this question:
As we stand here now, does anyone think it wise to run our standard offense and focus on throwing the ball into the post against UK?
I'm interested if anyone that posts here thinks that our standard, feed the post offense is the way to beat UK?
If you answer "no", you are venturing into red pill territory. You are questioning authority. You are challenging the monolith. You seek the truth.
And I will offer an alternative to some comments above. It is not just whether we win ugly, or lose. Those aren't the only choices. You can win pretty. You can win going away. You can win by exploiting your offensive resources and kicking the other team's a**. We can win "play(ing) to our strengths ... " Or you can win ugly, at home, against TCU --- shooting 10 three pointers. Or you can lose on the road at WVU, shooting only 11 three pointers.
22-5, winning the conference all these years, provides evidence.
Getting upset in the NCAA tourney ahead of "chalk" on the bracket -- beaten by a team that we are favored to beat, four of the last five seasons -- also provides evidence.
Sometimes the evidence is not crystal clear.