🏀 KuBuckets Archive

Read-only archive of KuBuckets.com (2013-2025)
BAD BALL: OU GAME MAKES CLEAR--THE DOG HUNTS!
Mar 08, 2015 01:02 PM #1

BAD BALL: ITS OFFICIAL, THE DOG HUNTS

Shrinking impact space is so simple.

It's so Joe Frazier.

We already knew it mostly worked against one of the toughest non conference schedules in the country, even when we were green wood rubes learning to play it.

We learned it could beat Hoiberg's pro approach to long ball offence.

We learned it could beat long teams once you learned to play it well.

We learned it could win even when you went 0-fer from three.

We learned it could win conference.

But the litmus test of any strategy is does it work, when everything is going against you--when you get caught in a perfect storm?

KU lost by a couple at the buzzer against a good OU team with a very sharp coach playing for its life in a meaningless game to KU!!

The team was as besieged by adversity, as any team in Self's KU tenure. Only seven scholarship athletes suited up. Four of those were reputedly playing injured. Two players were suspended, one just before the game. A road game. The team shot 24% the first half.

It lost, but only at the buzzer, and only because of a defensive breakdown.

Make no mistake.

THE DOG HUNTS!

BAD BALL is the new good.

NO OTHER OFFENSIVE AND DEFENSIVE SCHEME IN THE HISTORY OF COLLEGE BASKETBALL COULD HAVE COME WITHIN A COUPLE OF WINNING THAT GAME!

NOT ONE!

The team is for real.

The scheme is for real.

Call it what you like.

The players are for real.

The Merrill's Marauders of college basketball are for real.

A skirmish was lost in the village of Norman, but skirmishes are often lost in brutal campaigns. Frankly, the Marauders will be even bolder, even more cocksure after his game in which even the backups and walking rounded proved themselves up to the task of competing with another team at full strength. Every member of this bailing wire bound and chewing gum stuck together team belongs in the heroes hall of fame.

It turns out a handful young American boys CAN be turned into hardened jungle fighters on hardwood.

Tactics CAN become strategy.

You can hear it in Brigadier General Frank "The Self" Merrill's words and tone.

HE BELIEVES NOW.

He knows he has something waaaaay special here, if he can just hold it together a little longer--just get some guys healed up some--just get the suspended reinstated.

He has a better mouse trap.

He has the right guys with the hearts of lions.

Everyone doubts it can be done.

But he knows it can be.

Will be.

The slog to Myitkyina continues.

Mar 08, 2015 01:14 PM #2

!image.jpg ↗

Mar 08, 2015 01:54 PM #3

!image.jpg ↗

Mar 08, 2015 03:08 PM #4

Time to welcome our boys home!

The Jayhawk Division returns from their battle abroad in Normania.

They have successfully neutralized the Sooner aggression in the Midwest!

!img_news_homecoming_1960b.jpg ↗

Mar 08, 2015 03:35 PM #5

@wrwlumpy Perfect illustration to complement the author's prose. Bravo.

Mar 08, 2015 03:46 PM #6

I do not disagree that the dog hunts.

However, I believe this strategy is much more fitting for an under-talented team that by its very nature is fighting for its life each game.

This is a highly talented team -- and this strategy brings us back to our competition.

In an NCAA tourney scenario, where one loss is the end of the season, I don't like it.

We have a wildly talented offensive team. It has been morphed into something ugly, and something much different.

Yesterday was a great example of the positive of this approach. I can't argue with that at all. In fact, the game yesterday was better than any of the prior five games, in my opinion. I suspect at AFH we might have won the game yesterday by two or three points.

But I also think that even if Ellis and Selden were healthy and Greene wasn't irresponsible, we were destined to play a one or two possession game. Does anyone think that this bad ball stuff would render any other result? That dog does not have a long NCAA tourney life.

That is the unreliability and inherent risk of this approach. The late game volatility comes much more into play. It's hard to see just kicking someone's a**.

Where I see hope is if we start really embracing the outside/perimeter game with this attack the basket mentality. That, I think, will be critical to NCAA tourney advancement. I'm encouraged that we've shot 15 threes in each of the last two games. That's better than the 10.5 average of the four prior games. We just need to keep shooting them. Regain that stroke. But hope is just that, and I don't expect it.

Mar 08, 2015 03:53 PM #7

@HighEliteMajor

Agreed. Take it to the rack and score IF it's there. If not, kick for wide open 3. Selden 18' 2's are turnovers.

Mar 08, 2015 04:11 PM #8

@HighEliteMajor

"But I also think that even if Ellis and Selden were healthy and Greene wasn't irresponsible, we were destined to play a one or two possession game. "

I feel 99% sure that if we had all these guys it still would have ended a one or two possession game. We fight JUST hard enough to contest these games. There is still room for improvement on toughness. Like bowing out on the last play of the game yesterday, similar to what we did at WVU. Fight that hard and then go soft for 5 seconds and lose... means there is room for improvement on toughness.

I am addressing the one big weakness of this team. It is the fact that even when they play tough... they play JUST tough enough. This is why Self has turned away from the 3. Because the guys will hit a few shots and go soft.

Until they can play tough after hitting several 3s, this is the only choice for a strategy. It is better than blazing the nets for a half and then coming out soft for the second half (aka OU game in AFH). If we do that in March we will be toast, and also become the laughing stock of the nation if we give away a 25-pt lead to a mid major for the upset loss.

The identity of this team (moving forward) shouldn't become "a perimeter shooting team".... it should be "a team that plays tough for 40-minutes."

They do that and then we reward them with bringing back the 3 ball by running perimeter sets.

Playing tough through thick and thin is the key objective moving forward... and it needs to be for 40 minutes in a game.... not 39 minutes and 55 seconds!

Mar 08, 2015 04:18 PM #9

@drgnslayr I think w/a full healthy roster we beat these guys by at least 10. Jmo

Mar 08, 2015 04:23 PM #10

Weve shown we can win or lose the 1 or 2 possesion game in the final seconds With the bad ball approach. That alone seems to make it scary for the ncaa tourney. You dont get another chance. Hopefully the toughness building is just a developmental process coach is putting them thru. And he will let the dogs loose in the dance. As we all know. You need to be able to win games several different ways to have a deep run. Im hoping the toughness will come thru when we need it. When the threes arent fallin and the post is clogged

Mar 08, 2015 04:29 PM #11

@VailHawk Unfortunately, with Selden, the 3s are almost turnovers, as well - he's 0 - the last 4 games and 2 - 19 over the last 6 games. I get that he may have a bum ankle or other physical ailments, but he's killing us on the offensive end. Throw in TOs and non-rebounding, and he really should just be subbing in for a few minutes a game until he is healthy - not getting 30 minutes a game (and 18 yesterday). But, we know Self likes to ride certain horses, regardless of what the data and your eyes tell you.

Mar 08, 2015 04:30 PM #12

@jaybate-1.0 I think we attacked the basket better yesterday than what I've seen this year. Our shooting % was horrid, so we need some shots to fall. I never thought I would say this, but I think it helps not having Cliff in there. Michelson, Landen, and Jamari played a hell of a game, with Landen looking the best I've seen him all year. Hope he continues to use Michelson more and more - he plays with an intensity that our team needs.

Mar 08, 2015 04:35 PM #13

@DCHawker do you think coach trusts Selden more than he does Svi?

Mar 08, 2015 04:41 PM #14

@Crimsonorblue22 Apparently so, but we've seen this story played out many times with Self over the years - he stays with certain guys even if they aren't producing. Not sure if it's loyalty or the stubbornness trait coming through. There was a stretch over 4-5 games where Selden was a major contributor, but that isn't the case over the past six. The way he has been playing lately, esp. if it is due to injury, personally I would much prefer to see his minutes go to Graham, Greene (if he gets out of the doghouse), and yes, Svi.

Mar 08, 2015 04:47 PM #15

@DCHawker I think Dg has been getting more of seldens time. He was struggling too. This game would have been beneficial to BG and team if he could straighten up!

Mar 08, 2015 04:51 PM #16

@DCHawker Yes sir, he is known far and wide for loyalty beyond reason. Sometimes, thats a good thing..sometimes it's a bad thing. Currently with Selden, it's a bad thing.

Mar 08, 2015 04:58 PM #17

@Crimsonorblue22 Agreed - huge missed opportunity for Brannen - would have been looking at 25-30 minutes. With regard to Devonte, he's struggled a bit (including yesterday), but I give him a pass because he is still a freshman and hasn't played the full season. In his last 3 games where he's gotten more than 20 minutes, he's scored 20, 10 and 8. More importantly, he contributes in other ways - unlike Selden, he can drive fairly effectively. And, the offense opens a bit more when he and Frank are in at the same time - allows more chances for him, Frank or Kelly to attack the rim. Whether it's injury or not (and I'm not convinced that it Is), I think Devonte gives us a lot more than Selden right now.

Mar 08, 2015 05:02 PM #18

@DCHawker i have thot that the whole year about Selden/Graham. It might be different if Wayne was 100% healthy, but I'm not so sure he hasn't been hurt all year.

Mar 08, 2015 05:10 PM #19

@KUSTEVE Health may be a part of it, but having watched him closely for the past two years, I think that maybe Selden is what he is - which is a solid, but limited ballplayer. I had really thought that based on his freshman year, he would be a consistent 15 ppg scorer, tough defender and someone you could post against smaller guards down low. Alas, it hasn't played out that way.

The reason I'm a bit skeptical that it is all injury related is that he's shown a fair amount of hop on several occasions trying (and succeeding) in blocking breakaway layups. And, lack of hops or bad ankle doesn't have that much to do with his ball-handling, which, putting it mildly, is not good. He is one-handed and cannot deal with pressure and he is simply clueless driving into traffic.

I don't mean to be down on the guy - he seems like a really solid citizen and I'm glad he is a Jayhawk. But, right now, he isn't our best option on the wing.

Mar 08, 2015 06:29 PM #20

@KUSTEVE

It grows increasingly apparent that Hunter could not be allowed to play, because anyone he might replace would be offending either the SHOECO-AGENCY COMPLEX, or the big recruiting markets. Neither of sources of recruits will supply further recruits if any of their guys sit for a player NOT from those two recruiting supply conduits. It seems increasingly apparent that Hunter was as good as Landen (Portland), Jamari (Chicago), or Cliff (Chicago and SHOECO-AGENCY COMPLEX for OADS). Self has to play the guys that will get the recruiting supply conduits to supply future players. Hunter sitting has apparentlya had zero to do with his ability. He rebounds better than Jamari and as well as Landen, guards as well as both, runs the floor better than Landen, guards the post as well as both, hedges as well as both, and blocks as well as both, and shoots better than both. But playing him does not contribute to recruiting, so he has to sit. Hunter would have to be sharply better. If Hunter had grown up in a recruiting hotbed, or gone to a basketball factory academy highschool, he would have played 20 mpg easy. But with his background, tie goes to those the enable future recruiting. End the naivety about this issue. Next.

P.S. This has zero to do with skin color IMHO and everything to do with which recruiting context you come out of,

Mar 08, 2015 07:01 PM #21

@DCHawker For all Selden is at times-the mid air catch & pass to Traylor for the highlight flush late vs WVU, or 0-fer an entire game like yeaterday, I think you gave an accurate perspective. He's finished at the rack himself about 5% of his opportunities so much I think he needs glasses. Plus his defensive footwork is horrid at times. Guards pass him by fast as a goose passes crap & he's as streaky as a foggy windshield in a blizzard. Some games I swear he can't hit the ocean. It's pretty obvious that he's the starting 2 now, but if DG or Svi were sophomores it might have a much different smell.

Mar 08, 2015 07:03 PM #22

@DCHawker I love Wayne, but his game has been the most inconsistent of any player not named Greene on the team. To me, he forces action way too much, resulting in ill advised shots, missed dunks, etc. It doesn't help that he's down to one good leg.

Mar 08, 2015 07:06 PM #23

@jaybate-1.0 Oh, so you saw it too. I couldn't believe the guy i was watching yesterday sky for blocks and rebounds. Where has he been?

Mar 08, 2015 07:10 PM #24

@KUSTEVE At times he is also like clockwork, a TO machine...IMO the quick hook has been vacant from his doorstep.

Mar 08, 2015 07:18 PM #25

@jaybate-1.0 I have a very intense feeling about the 3rd season coming up. The post season. Our guys might get dropped to a 3 seed at worst. Might. Either way, this KU team is the definition of tough. The definition of heart. The Madness is all about match ups. KU can match up with anyone now. They have proven that. They dont care if they get their shots blocked 14 times, they dont care if they miss every 3pta. They keep fighting. They keep charging forward with the tenacity of a pitbull, with the tenacity of an injured fighter ready to deliver the KO. They smell blood and it may be their own but it makes them stronger. They will not fold to a Stanford team this season. They will not fold to a UK team this season. Now, its win or go home and our boys will continue to fight and take punches until the very last 0.1 tick on the clock.

Mar 08, 2015 07:20 PM #26

@HighEliteMajor I completely respect your opinion HEM. I do. Please keep saying our boys wont last long in the madness this year. They feed off of it. It makes them stronger.

RCJH

Mar 08, 2015 07:21 PM #27

@Lulufulu If they could just learn to defend a bit better until that very last tick - or 4 or 5 ticks anyway... ;)

Mar 08, 2015 07:23 PM #28

@jaybate-1.0 Fascinating. Very interesting indeed. Inquiry, IF KU needs Hunter to come out and get some O boards and block some shots and knock some down in the next couple of weeks, do you think Bill puts him in?

Mar 08, 2015 07:36 PM #29

@DCHawker
I agree with you about Brannen missing valuable PT to show off his case. That said, I would NOT trust BG to get us far or FF. His lackadaisical attitude (his confidence in 3s has been both blessing & curse) has prevented him to grow as a defender & killer. He has not proven to be a Navy Seal. Self had to discipline him for being late or missing the work out. Well his body needs the most muscle (compared to other players) if he wants to create his own shots - that kid has a lanky body that is without discipline or muscle. Guys like Mason can push BG around. It's my supposition that BG has been frustrated because his 3s aren't dropping, so he did something stupid again. See this as more of a character issue with BG unlike that of Marines or Mason's! Self should have left his sorry a-- home instead of taking him to OU. I'm critical of this kid because he can do so much more than being a 3pt princess - in defending, fighting, etc. Plus, he canNOT dribble! Traylor has a better shot at NBA than BG. Banking on his ability to hit 3s has prevented him from developing & growing to becoming one he-- of a player, but I remain dubious for now. I totally get why he didn't get PT before.

Mar 08, 2015 07:41 PM #30

@jaybate-1.0
Thank you for helping me understand the mystery! Hunter was impressive, and for the life of me couldn't understand why Self wasn't playing him. Unfortunately, Self has to play the game. Sad for Hunter. Life is not always fair or just. Now, I'm really hoping Hunter gets to shine in the tourney!

Mar 08, 2015 07:53 PM #31

@HawksWin I'm certainly not going to defend Greene on the character front - he clearly has some growing up to do. Nor would I "trust" him to carry us. The question is, who can we count on at the 2 right now??? My point is that whether it's due to injury or not, Selden has contributed nothing over the past several games - no scoring, no rebounding, not much defense and too many turnovers. Hate to say it, but right now, I don't "trust" him, as well. If not Selden, then who? Greene certainly isn't a complete answer - apart from being irresponsible or whatever (just inexcusable when we were already short-handed) - he hasn't been hitting 3s. Improved, but still a net defensive liability. But, I would always take him shooting a 3 over Selden. And, he has been rebounding reasonably well - certainly better than Selden. And, he is our best FT shooter. Svi? We really don't have enough to go on - probably too late in the season to put him in high leverage situations, but I think he can give us a few solid minutes. That leaves with with Graham - still learning, but at this point, I think he is our best option at the two - and gives us the most options on offense. I would be giving him 30 minutes a game now - 20 minutes+ at the 2 and subbing for Mason at point.

Mar 08, 2015 07:55 PM #32

@Lulufulu This is 2012 again. I thought these guys reminded me some of 2008 at times earlier in the season, but I think they are 2012 all over again. I think Mickelson can do a poor man's Withey ...Perry can play TRob, Kelly can be a taller Travis, Selden has EJ down to a T, and Frank is Tyshawn. Only we have much more off the bench than 2012, imo.

Mar 08, 2015 08:05 PM #33

So Hunter is not playing more because of shoes and it somehow affecting future recruiting? Really JB?

@Lulufulu What about 3-3 in the last 6 games makes you think we're really going to do well in the tourney? What about 3-3 makes you think we won't fold to a UK team? I like your optimism but it might be a tad bit overly optimistic, don't you think?

@drgnslayr Watching yesterday I was trying to conjecture how we'd be doing against OU with a full squad. For some reason we just can't say we lost by two with 3 1/2 guys missing so we'd probably win by 10 otherwise.

@KUSteve I really like your enthusiasm! 2012 all over again? I'd take that. I hope you're right. I have a feeling more like we could be repeating any of our 1st weekend losses.

Mar 08, 2015 08:20 PM #34

@jaybate-1.0

Not so sure what we saw Saturday was Bad ball. In fact I think I could make a case we seen glimpses of what KU was doing before they started down this whole bad ball trail that has left KU with 3 more loses in five games.

KU guards though nervous at first at shooting three began to find their stroke again, as they could keep shooting with out fear of being benched.

Believe or not he the High low seemed to work better without Ellis in there. Not really sure why? But it was working. KU actually had inside passing.

KU guards weren't just driving to get fouled. They were looking for the open man.

My friend that's not bad ball. That's how the game should be played. Just my two cents.

Mar 08, 2015 08:26 PM #35

@Lulufulu

If he is not bumping any one that will offend the recruiting supply line, then he will always play quite a bit. But never when he is IMHO.

Mar 08, 2015 08:32 PM #36

@KUSTEVE I've posted elsewhere that this team is taking on some of the characteristics of the '11-12 team - but that's primarily from a toughness, grind-it-out mentality. That team really wasn't that talented - at least in terms of NBA caliber talent - and which struggled offensively for long stretches.

But, I don't think the teams compare well on a person-to-person basis and on their core strengths. That team was really tough down low - a truly great rim protector in Withey and low post beast in Robinson. Really good perimeter defenders, as well, all with size. They were tough to score on. But, offense often ended up being Taylor driving as the clock shot was expiring.

I would also note that team won 8 straight games or something like that headed into the B12 tourney (lost to a ranked Baylor team in the semis).

The comparison with '11-12 is that I think we are indeed capable of grinding out 4 wins to make it to the FF (depending on match-ups, of course). Recall that team was ekeing out wins - only "easy" one was UNC. But, we also have very little margin for error and it wouldn't be shocking if we fell to a 15 or 14 seed in the first round.

Mar 08, 2015 08:32 PM #37

@Lulufulu Anything I can do.

But I am open to learning here. Self is the master. If Kansas wins three in a row in the Big 12 tourney playing this way, that will say something. I just have tough time envisioning three in a row with this offensive style, combined with our roster. I get it if we're big, mean, and muscular inside. But we're not. Playing and beating three good Big 12 teams in a row will really tell me that this dog hunts. I'm usually not the gloom and doom guy on the NCAA tourney -- I don't like being that guy.

Mar 08, 2015 08:35 PM #38

@DCHawker Good point ... can we borrow a Thomas Robinson and Jeff Withey somehow?

Mar 08, 2015 08:43 PM #39

@HighEliteMajor Hah. Well, we weren't supposed to have to borrow them. Coming in, Alexander was supposed to be the low post load and at least I thought Mickelson could be Withey-lite - certainly showed comparable shot-blocking skills even earlier in development. Hasn't quite played out that way. Maybe Cliff gets back in time for the tournament (sure) and the light goes on for him and Self has simply been hiding Hunter and he breaks out our secret weapon.

Mar 08, 2015 08:51 PM #40

@DCHawker et al,

This team compares well with no previous team, because no previous team has ever been this weak in the front court, only one was this young on the perimeter, and no KU TEAM has ever played Bad Ball.

This is a new frontier and that is why Self is so juiced, despite the frustrations. This really IS a new challenge!

It might never happen again if a bumper crop of OADs signs. And if they don't it is the blue print for next year.

Mar 08, 2015 08:54 PM #41

@HighEliteMajor Withey is available as New Orleans isn't using him.

Mar 08, 2015 09:11 PM #42

@Crimsonorblue22 It's like an allegiance HCBS has to his more experienced players. This has been cussed and discussed many times on this board and the other board. I think you said "because he was due" when someone commented about sitting Selden or giving Selden the final shot. It's like HCBS will give someone like Selden forever to break out of a slump, but not let Svi have the same opportunity. Yesterday's game was a throw away game that should've been the opportunity for Svi to put up some 3's. Selden had his chance and it didn't help. Would've been a good chance for "bonehead" too if he hadn't screwed his teammates. And since I brought up "bonehead", how many more chances does one get under HCBS to be a "bonehead" who apparently puts himself before his team? And I'm not talking about Cliff.

Mar 08, 2015 09:46 PM #43

@wissoxfan83 No I really dont think its overly optimistic. Last years team went 3-3 the last 6 games too and they folded to Stanford. Nothing about this years team says fold to me. Nothing.

Mar 08, 2015 09:52 PM #44

@jaybate-1.0 Only comparison I was making was the toughness of '15 compared to '12

Mar 08, 2015 10:04 PM #45

@KUSTEVE I agree. This team can make a run as long as we are healthy. Perry and Mason will be the keys but other guys will step up.

Our 3-3 record in the last 6 doesn't bother me. How me play in the Big 12 tournament doesn't really get me that excited. It just isn't that relevant. How many times have we come into the NCAA on fire and then simply laid an egg? Quite a few. 2010 and 2011 come to mind.

It is all about winning and advancing. UCONN last year is such a great example of this. They limped into the tournament. Got beat by Louisville by 35 late in the year. Barely beat St. Joe's in the opening round of the tourney as a 7 seed! They scrapped. They won games they trailed in. They beat taller and more talented teams. They simply dug deep and played "tougher" than the competition. This is a tough KU team. Mason is tough. Selden is tough. Perry has been playing his most aggressive and inspired basketball of his KU career. I think we tough our way to a good run as we did in 2012.

Mar 08, 2015 10:16 PM #46

@brooksmd I was kidding about Selden having that shot! Playing the odds. Seldens minutes have been dropping. Svi getting minutes, but not there. BG would have helped!

Mar 08, 2015 10:17 PM #47

@Lulufulu

"No I really dont think its overly optimistic. Last years team went 3-3 the last 6 games too and they folded to Stanford. Nothing about this years team says fold to me. Nothing."

I don't follow that logic.

Mar 08, 2015 10:22 PM #48

@DoubleDD

"Believe or not he the High low seemed to work better without Ellis in there. Not really sure why? But it was working. KU actually had inside passing. "

I think it worked better because it fit the skill set and roles of Landen and Hunter. Perry is a bit smaller and just doesn't post up well with his back to the basket. Perry is more the interior slasher.

I think this was a great game for Landen and Hunter to become more our 5 guys moving forward. Both are capable of making the interior passes needed in the hi/lo. And with Perry back, they can be feeding him to score! I'd use Jamari more as a back up for Perry because he can be a very effective scorer as long as he is slashing and not taking the midrange jumper.

We all have to remember that the hi/lo is Self's bread and butter. Who says he is really good at coaching anything else on offense? We know he is capable of coaching the hi/lo well.

@HighEliteMajor

"Playing and beating three good Big 12 teams in a row will really tell me that this dog hunts"

That would definitely prove "this dog hunts." But even if we don't... we at least should make quality games moving forward. Really... two of our recent losses came on last second give ups. If we can tighten up our last second defense, we will be a lot more effective in the win column. This BAD BALL always produces close games... meaning... close endings. This area seems to be the most-important area to work on moving forward.

Examine most of our March losses and it points to last second possessions. This has always been our Achilles heel.

From here on out.. our guys really have to put in the extra reps in practice on the FT line, and work on good last possession defense. The OU loss was a hard fought game we deserved to win, but we collapsed and gave away the weak-side rebound. Every one of our guys should have been hustling back to get that rebound... we gifted it to Buddy instead.

These open-court drives kill us. Our guys need to learn a bit more about hedge defense to take away the drive. It usually doesn't totally prevent the drive, but it definitely helps slow it down. Svi did a good job hedging Buddy when he turned it over on the spin move. Svi hedged him and forced him into it. Buddy screwed up because he was used to Kansas players giving him his right-side drive.

The reason it worked is because Svi realized where his position was in relation to the basket behind him and Buddy in front of him. He pinched off the direct drive.

That is different than what Frank did at WVU, giving up the spin drive to the hole from Staten. Frank went out of position. He didn't realize where he was in relation to the basket. He gave away the direct drive to the rim.

This is all about learning hedge defense.

Mar 08, 2015 10:26 PM #49

@drgnslayr and we need to pray that Ellis is strong!

Mar 08, 2015 10:28 PM #50

@Crimsonorblue22

It has been a real thrill watching Perry's recent aggressiveness! It's like a light went on in his head. You can even see a bit of swagger with him! He's on the right track! He keeps going like he is the NBA will become a real possibility in his future!

Mar 08, 2015 10:31 PM #51

@drgnslayr I meant I hope he's recovered!

Mar 08, 2015 10:49 PM #52

@wissoxfan83

I'm surprised anyone doubts this hypothesis. Why would you play a guy that wouldn't get you more recruits instead of one that would, if they were about equal? And as I said, it's not just about SHOECO-AGENCY COMPLEX dynamics, but about basketball factory academies and AAU and highschool coach feeder systems, too. Who plays IS recruiting!

Mar 08, 2015 10:55 PM #53

@Crimsonorblue22 Just an observation, but we only beat them by seven at home at full strength. You might recall that we were down 1 with 3:45 left in the game, went four out/one in, and that sealed the deal -- and thank you for giving me the lead in to mention four out/one in again. I don't feel complete if I can't mention that at least daily.

Mar 08, 2015 11:46 PM #54

Funny thing about Wayne Selden. Has anybody noticed that he was voted as honorable mention all conference. This is not too bad for someone with 2 left feet and 2 right arms who can't get out of his own way and only plays because he is obviously the coaches pet.

Mar 08, 2015 11:47 PM #55

@sfbahawk ouch!

Mar 09, 2015 12:00 AM #56

@jaybate-1.0 Did you read this weeks Sports Illustrated? It had a couple of articles about college basketball and especially scoring going to hell in a hand basket. I actually liked what they call the style of ball we have been playing of late. Instead of BAD ball in is VOMIT ball.

Since you introduced the term my only problem is that "bad" has the connotation of inept. Can't dribble, shoot, pass, etc. While there may be times this might be the case, what you seem to imply is "good" ball is fun to watch, flows, and lets players demonstrate their athletic prowess. I like vomit (or ugly) as an adjective because it describes something that is aesthetically lacking rather than something that indicates complete lack of talent.

Mar 09, 2015 12:10 AM #57

@joeloveshawks When I point out they remind me of 2012, it took a very poised team to play that focused at OU. This was not a team that blinked one bit having 3.5 players out. They came from 10 down on the road to a top 15 team, and damn near beat them. They have to learn to be on the right side of these squeakers, but I'd rather lose a few now if it helps us learn to win a close one or two in the tournament. That 2012 team simply out toughed teams 5 straight times in the NCAA tourney, and this team has similar potential.

Mar 09, 2015 12:14 AM #58

@HighEliteMajor

I started the season thinking this was a team lacking all the pieces it needed to be very good. It has never seemed like a talented team, it seemed like a team with slow to develop 5-star 4--our own LeBryant Nash, two OAD's, and one injured TAD. The rest were projects and long shots. When one of the OADs did not pan out, and we had no 5, It seemed potentially worse than the 8-10 loss team I expected initially, IF things broke good with injuries and players developing. Injuries broke bad. Development broke bad and good. To me, if Self hadn't invented this new way of playing we would have 12-15 losses.

Mar 09, 2015 12:41 AM #59

@brooksmd

"And since I brought up "bonehead", how many more chances does one get under HCBS to be a "bonehead" who apparently puts himself before his team? And I'm not talking about Cliff."

You talking about a player or assistant coach?

@jaybate-1.0

"Why would you play a guy that wouldn't get you more recruits instead of one that would, if they were about equal?"

I really hate how college basketball has just turned into nothing more than a recruitment battle.

It is because coaches just don't want to put the energy into developing players. They just want to recruit the most athletic players possible and then spend little time developing, and more time recruiting the next batch of cheetahs. It sickens me. I think Calipari has stolen the bright lights and all other coaches are now in mimic mold; putting on their plaid salesman pants and hit the streets going full-time on recruiting.

Does anyone in here really think Snacks knows how to develop players? Or was he just a pick up to help recruit in Chicago?

Imagine if we JUST focused on development? Get the word out and then sign up hungry 4-star recruits that want a ticket to the NBA.

Maybe I'm just not realistic any longer....

Mar 09, 2015 01:39 AM #60

@jaybate-1.0 I've been reading your stuff for a decade now I suppose. You're one of my KU heroes. But my eyes glaze over when you start writing stuff like "SHOECO-AGENCY COMPLEX dynamics" because I really don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Put it in simple terms. Why isn't Mickelson playing?

@KUSTEVE do you think a lack of Danny Manning on the bench will handicap this team in March? To me, that's one of the differences between our team now and then.

Mar 09, 2015 02:11 AM #61

@drgnslayr Greene

Mar 09, 2015 03:08 AM #62

@wissoxfan83 That's one of our biggest problems - we have recruiters sitting on the bench ...no Manning...no Dooley....i'm thinking Snacks will be gone at the end of the year, and hopefully we can add someone that can recruit and coach.

Mar 09, 2015 04:36 AM #63

@wissoxfan83

Landen Lucas, Portland MSA, pop. 2.3 million

Hunter Mikelson, Jonesboro, AR, pop. 71k

My guess is that Portland produces more players than Jonesboro. My guess is it helps Kurtis recruit PORTLAND if Landen is playing more than if Hunter is.

Next what if Devonte and Conner Frankamp were about equal? Devonte comes from a basketball academy highschool that produces several D1 prospects each season. Conner comes from a highschool that infrequently produces 1 D1 prospect each seAson. Who do you suppose might help you gain access to recruiting players?

Same hypothesis for Jamari and Hunter.

Same hypothesis for Cliff and Hunter.

Regarding Big Shoe, Agents and Agent runners,re-read what Rick Pitino reputedly said about agents and agent runners reputedly influencing recruiting in some way related to shoe companies and schools.

Mar 09, 2015 05:26 AM #64

@KUSTEVE As has been made painfully obvious we don't have any idea what the coaches sitting on our bench really do. Because Danny was one of the better college players of all time and he was a "big" we assume that he was what made "big man U". Regardless of the fact that Self had Norm Cook and other bigs at Illinois who were very good. We guess that Joe Dooley had a great influence on Self and was the offensive guru. He is gone so we are sunk. We know that Norm and Kurtis are good recruiters because Self has credited them will some of our better finds. Other than that what do they do?

Snacks is credited with getting Cliff and has been alluded to have great Chicago creds. Can he or can he not teach the best way to set a screen?

Unfortunately none of knows Jack about what any of these people do or have done on a daily basis as assistants at KU. We know NOTHING about how TRob or Withey or Brandon or anyone for that matter was developed at KU other than the head coach was Bill Self.

Basketball in general has gone into the crapper in the past 10-15 years with very few players having basic, fundamental skills. There is almost no one who would argue with this. Slayr is correct that boxing our for rebounding is sadly lacking. One would think that a good assistant would teach them this. Along with the other thousand and one things that they do not know. Of course this is stuff that a good 5th grade coach would be teaching but for whatever reason is not.

This has nothing in particular to do with you but it drives me nuts to spend so much of my life (my wife thinks that I an crazy and she may be right) reading what I assume are reasonably bright people who jump to all sorts of conclusions on a myriad things for which we know nothing.

Where do you or anyone suggest that we find these people who can replace all of the people we are going to fire? Why are they going to be able to teach our next group of recruits things that they have shown no interest in learning since they have not developed the them after 8-10 years of playing by the time we see them?

This is just another example of a problem that we see. Let's pretend that it is a little cut. We pick and pick at the scab and soon enough we are convinced that we have gangrene and will have to cut our arm off.

Fortunately the year will end. Another will begin with 2 or 3 people we are convinced walk on water. After a few months we will realize that they don't and we will analyze the hell out of the situation and be certain that whatever the coach has decided should work has no chance. Is this really the "Great Mandala".? I guess only JB knows for sure.

Mar 09, 2015 06:57 AM #65

@KUSTEVE Did Wayne Selden look hurt to anybody on this board when he stripped that WVU player at midcourt and raced down for a tomahawk jam? That may have been before the turned ankle, but its hard to argue season-long-hurt.

I may like Wayne Selden a lot, but Im not giving him an out, especially if he plays for Bill Self. I'm just waiting for a 19-20yr old kid to become more consistent. NBA body, but he's no DWade yet. But he has shown flashes in all areas. The most consistent thing he's done since Day 1 is defense. And true to his word, the summer before his frosh season, he said he was committed to defense first.

So he kept his word, and even played hurt many times. I want him to have a good pro career, so I do want his offense to come around. But if he comes back for another season, Im all for that, as that's good for Wayne, and that gives Self a solid upperclassman glue Mickey D to run "our stuff". (Along with upperclassmen Ellis, Jamari, Landon, Hunter, Greene, Mason...).

Man, where are we going to put the 12th banner???

Mar 09, 2015 07:22 AM #66

Instead of BadBall, call it what it is: BadAssBall.

Note to FreeThe3 Movement: When the 3gun went silent vs WVU, rough&tough got us the W. Against Huggo-Muggo's bunch, no less. One of the most brutal games I can recall KU in, after that infamous game @Cal 4yrs ago. And we won both.

Here's the biggest problem I have with the FreeThe3 Philosophy: Its reproducibility. Man, not even IowaState (Free3 poster-team) can corral that silly-but-damning concept of regression-to-the-mean. And the most interesting twist of all, is that this season's stats (in conf) proved that KU was a better 3 shooting team than IowaState.

Another practical point on the 3-shooting reproducibility thing: Look at the very best: Greene, even he has fallen off. Wayne got hot, now cold. Frank was over 45% for the season, then cooled off some. Say the same for everybody on IowaState. And as someone who has loved the 3ball personally everytime Ive played basketball in the last 30+ years: some days you just cant hit the ocean. It happens to the best. It happens to Ray Allen, even. And we are looking to college players, and underclassmen, no less...to be consistent from 3?

But, if you have an identity about toughness and defense, that is more about brute mindset. Its about reflexes. Its less about finicky muscle memory, affected by varying "springy-ness" in muscles day-to-day, various brands, touch, and weights of basketballs used by various schools, by the lighting, by the temperature, by the pucker factor of game situation, espn day crew distractions, Texas redhead math major katoongs distractions, yada, yada, etc, etc, etc.

Toughness is who you are and who you've become. Not something you have to "run a play" to try to get. Want consistency? My god, why would you look to the 3ball for that? Especially when the 2 best 3 shooting teams in the conference (KU & ISU) just got done proving that its NOT consistent. Toughness is at your core. The 3ball is but a tool in the armamentarium, don't know if you'll be "on" or not. Was Russell Robinson's or Thomas Robinson's toughness ever turned off? I could get teary-eyed reminiscing how TRob even tried to bring his toughness the day after his mom died...

Mar 09, 2015 09:42 AM #67

@sfbahawk

I presently am content with our assistants even though I don't know their daily duties.

I hope Snacks is finding another outlet for stress and can lose some weight for his heart's sake.

I suspect fundamentals taught are changing as the game changes.

My dad was taught a sliding two hand set shot as a fundamental in the 1930s. It ceased to be taught in a game taken over by jump shooting.

Mar 09, 2015 10:32 AM #68

@sfbahawk

Did not see the SI story.

Vomit Ball?

I don't like tossing pizzas, so the term does not work for me.😄

Seriously, I don't see the college game deteriorating In any regards except rising physical contact, rising reliance on short timers and recent talent asymmetry apparently stemming from perhaps a SHOECO-AGENCY COMPLEX dynamic as yet inadequately understood.

The rest to me seems like "change."

FWIW, I do not recall a young KU team developing and evolving as much as this one has in a single season.

Defense and offense seem to oscillate in prominence.

I think anything new is hard for folks.

I believe BAD BALL is new.

Mar 09, 2015 11:39 AM #69

@sfbahawk You're right - I am not in the huddle, but I do have a pair of eyes, and I can see our defensive efficiency has gone down the last two years, since Joe left. I can see we have (had) the number 3 recruit in the country not break the lineup in a meaningful way ... a big who can't make it at Big Man U.Do I believe Cliff would've been playing less than half a game avg if Danny had been here? No, I don't. With Cliff's looming suspension for the season coming, it's a moot point anyway. It is simply my opinion, plus I'm not real excited about one of our coaches getting busted for pot, so it's not like I am going out on a limb here.

Mar 09, 2015 12:32 PM #70

@ralster

"Instead of BadBall, call it what it is: BadAssBall. "

"Toughness is who you are and who you've become. Not something you have to "run a play" to try to get. Want consistency? My god, why would you look to the 3ball for that?"

Man.... way to bring it!

I'm right on with that. I want to see our offensive efficiency improve... but not at the expense of toughness. I do believe Self did play a part in discarding our trey program, but he did it to get these guys focused on playing tough... primarily, playing tough defense and post offense.

I just think we need to adopt a mindset of toughness in all aspects of the game. The next steps should involve playing a more balanced offense with discipline and toughness from the perimeter, too. And how about focusing in our last second toughness. No more going soft in the last 5 seconds of a game on the line. That is the time to step up, not wilt.

But for the most part we are playing BadAssBall, and it is keeping us around in games we otherwise would have been blown out in. It just is not in Self's DNA to have a team in a point race without the ability to get a defensive stop. I'm glad it isn't who he is. Eventually most games' outcomes are determined by the team who can get stops.

Let's not forget the complete situation of this team. We've had some setbacks... most notably Cliff's lack of development and now absence. Who would think we could almost match the blocks against Texas trees, or outrebound anyone, or outscore a team in the paint?

The recent play of our post guys has been a remarkable turn of affairs. What was a negative, compounded further by the loss of our star freshman, has turned into a positive. I'm not saying we have good efficiency in the post. But at least we are competing. Can we really expect to advance in March without the ability to compete in the post?

I hope our trey ball comes back... but not if our guys decide to revert to soft ball again. I am a big Brannen fan... but he is sitting on the fence with this team. Self's biggest competition isn't with the teams we play against... it is with players like Brannen, who some times play lax.

Mar 09, 2015 03:32 PM #71

@jaybate-1.0 Why recruit Hunter at all in that case? Seems like a wasted schollie.

Mar 09, 2015 05:07 PM #72

@drgnslayr personally, i think Snacks is a dead-wt liability. I'd rather put Chi-town's own NC-winning KU alum Sherron Collins on the bench as an asst coach. Way more cred, to this ku alum anyways...

Mar 09, 2015 05:13 PM #73

@ralster he might get in the same kind of trouble.

Mar 09, 2015 05:15 PM #74

@ralster

I second the Sherron move. He has actually EARNED a spot on our bench! And he is a guy that could be helpful in developing our guards.

Mar 09, 2015 06:08 PM #75

@drgnslayr I love Sherron. Quite possibly one of the best Jayhawks ever. But is there actually talk of him coaching? If we are discussing letting go of Coach Howard due to some character flaws I suggest we remember that Sherron does not exactly have a sterling reputation. Elevator issues, etc.

Mar 09, 2015 06:10 PM #76

@joeloveshawks

We may be discussing it... but I doubt Self is.

The discussion is really about if our assistant coaches are helping much to develop players. Or are they just recruiters?

Mar 09, 2015 06:27 PM #77

@joeloveshawks nobody! Nobody loved playing for KU more than Sherron, but it may be a harder job for self to keep him out of trouble then it is BG! Jk

Mar 09, 2015 07:30 PM #78

@jaybate-1.0 If all this is true, Norman Dale is dead. (SHOECO-AGENCY-COMPLEX)

Mar 09, 2015 11:25 PM #79

The Selden thing is just puzzling to me. Never saw this coming. Svi doesn't look crisp right now. And he has just been hot and cold all season.

His work in games this season has been streaky. No points or something, then he'll hit a hot streak and score a bunch in a row. His finishing ability is perhaps the worst I've seen for a while. He can't elevate to dunk and he has not touch on layups.

Right now, I think Svi would be a better player than Selden had Svi been playing this entire time. That's mainly because Selden has been so inconsistent. But now isn't the time to play Svi.

But Graham, that's another story. Despite Graham's shooting line, I think we're better with him (generally) over Selden right now -- @icthawkfan316 has been a big proponent of this move for some time. Nothing wrong with Selden off the bench.

I would have been starting Greene over Selden since December -- back when Greene was responsible. Playing the way Self plays now, with this drive and attack strategy, I wouldn't do that now. Greene's role has been minimized by the strategy.

Mar 10, 2015 12:14 AM #80

@HighEliteMajor Agree with the Selden "puzzlement." As I posted in another thread with regard to Wayne and the Devonte option:

"Health may be a part of it, but having watched him closely for the past two years, I think that maybe Selden is what he is - which is a solid, but limited ballplayer. I had really thought that based on his freshman year, he would be a consistent 15 ppg scorer, tough defender and someone you could post against smaller guards down low. Alas, it hasn't played out that way.

The reason I'm a bit skeptical that it is all injury related is that he's shown a fair amount of hop on several occasions trying (and succeeding) in blocking breakaway layups. And, lack of hops or bad ankle doesn't have that much to do with his ball-handling, which, putting it mildly, is not good. He is one-handed and cannot deal with pressure and he is simply clueless driving into traffic.

I don't mean to be down on the guy - he seems like a really solid citizen and I'm glad he is a Jayhawk. But, right now, he isn't our best option on the wing.

With regard to Devonte, he's struggled a bit (including yesterday), but I give him a pass because he is still a freshman and hasn't played the full season. In his last 3 games where he's gotten more than 20 minutes, he's scored 20, 10 and 8. More importantly, he contributes in other ways - unlike Selden, he can drive fairly effectively. And, the offense opens a bit more when he and Frank are in at the same time - allows more chances for him, Frank or Kelly to attack the rim. Whether it's injury or not (and I'm not convinced that it Is), I think Devonte gives us a lot more than Selden right now."

Unless Selden is 100% healthy, I think we would be much better off with Graham getting the starter level minutes at the 2 - and giving Selden, Svi and Greene the sub minutes at the 2 or 3.

Mar 10, 2015 05:26 AM #81

@HighEliteMajor Wayne's inability to finish at the rim is a huge problem. The same could be said of his rebounding statistics. Given this and the fact that most on this board are down on him, why was he selected as an all Big XII honorable mention? The team is selected by the conference coaches. Although many if not most of the coaches are looked on here as something a dog leaves on a sidewalk, could they possibly see something that we don't?