I am torn on this issue.
I venture only a toss up between Jamari Traylor and Hunter Mickelson, among returning scholarship players, or an OAD.
OADs do not seem to improve over the coarse of a season. Instead, they seem to reach a point, when Self decides the hope for any improvement, no matter how much he tries to coach them; i.e., the hope that they might learn to play the game properly in a single season from coaching is dashed, and he just puts them in and lets them do what they could have done from the beginning.
I believe this is John Calipari's secret to coaching OADs.
OADs cannot be coached up in a single season.
They really do not get better at all.
They are just either denied being able to do what they can do naturally, or allowed to do it.
Every OAD KU has had has gone through this awkward phase of being coached that seems not to produce any measurable improvements.
Then at some point, Self says, "Okay, go play."
Many of us, including me, have rationalized this transition as players struggling with getting acclimated to D1 speeds and so on, and then suddenly, as Self says, "a light goes on."
I now think that is a lot of hogwash.
Every OAD KU signs should be put in the starting line up if he is better than another player, and allowed to do what he can do without any coaching to "develop" him as a player. They DON'T develop. They don't want to develop. There isn't time to develop. Their posses don't want them to develop. They can't rationally take any physical risks, beyond those that come from playing a fairly violent game, even when one protects the merchandize.
Play the mofo's if you are going to sign them.
Forget about them getting better.
They don't.
They just get less confused when the coaching stops and they are allowed to use the bag of tricks they are born with.