I've studied all the numbers heard all the points of view, but I can't shake this feeling that a good mid range jump shot can help a team
So the argument goes why take a mid range jumper when you can step back another 2 to 5 feet and hit a three? or pass the ball inside and take the easy two. These are fair points, and in a perfect world impossible to argue. Yet this isn't a perfect world.
I could get into actual measurements, but I won't. I will take it for granted most of you know the length and width of a half court in the college game. I will say most of the offense is played with in 25ft of the basket give or take a few feet as I believe the rim actually hangs 3ft into the court. So if you take into account the 4 to 5 feet for paint play or bunnies and 1 to 4ft for the three point shot you have somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 ft that is dead space or where the mid range jumper was king. That's over 1/3 of the half court, and nearly half of where the game is played that is dead space. That's a lot of room to roam if you follow.
Now I get taking a three at 20ft versus say 19 to 16 ft. I mean you're already that close to the three line so why not. I also get taking the bunny or paint layup if you can spin or drive for the layup/dunk. Yet this isn't a perfect world.
The game has been involving for sometime. Head coaches and stat lovers have done their homework. The three and the 4 to 5ft paint shots are by far the must fruitful shots to take. I cannot argue. Yet as trends go on the offense side of the ball, so do the trends go on the defense side of the ball. All head coaches know this as they prep or install their offense game plan to play inside or shoot three's, they also preach crash the paint and crowd the three point on line on the defense side of the ball.
We see it in almost every game we watch. The center or forward gets the ball in the paint and is double teamed or even sometimes tripled team. Sometimes he makes a great move and scores, and sometimes he passes the ball out to start the offense again. It doesn't end there though sometimes he makes a move turns the ball over or misses the shot. Again it doesn't end there in some cases he gets fouled. So if he makes a great move and scores then great. If he passes the ball back out, then it's no harm the offense starts over minus the precious seconds that clicked off the clock . Yet if he misses then that was an empty possession, maybe not a big deal unless the game is on the line. Basketball is no different than any other sport in that it's a game of emotion. Miss a bunny and it could change the momentum of the game. If he gets fouled then that's not all bad. It adds a foul to the other team's big, but teams nowadays have lots of bigs with many fouls to give. As they recruit to the way the game is played now. In the paint and from the three point line. Yet if fouled he gets a foul shot or two. Well with few exceptions the bigs are poor free throw shooters. In fact with the game on the line teams are instructed to foul the others teams bigs instead of the easy two. Lets not forget how many times did you see a big take the ball to the hoop with two guys in front of him and another hanging onto him? Sometimes the bunny isn't so easy. Not to mention the injuries that could come into play.
The three point shot has changed the game like no other. I have to admit I'm all for the three shot. I would even go as far to say it's not utilized enough, or maybe that's just because I'm a KU fan. LOL Yet the three has it's faults too. Very few teams hit for an high average from three land. Also it's not like bigs where you can recruit for size. Playing out on the perimeter requires a very special set of skills. Handling the ball, passing the ball. seeing the floor. and so much more. Yet shooting the three can be a fools game. Sometimes it's there and sometimes it's not. Also very few shoot the three with an high average. Which would stand to reason has they more times than not have a hand in their face as no opponent respects the midrange shot. They don't even look for it.
My case for the midrange jumper is not half hearted, but full hearted. I just feel if you going to play offense in 47ft of court then why not use all that footage to your advantage? The midrange jumper used to be apart of this game and now it has no use? I just don't buy it. At the very least it would make a defense think or change their game plan. I remember the Morris Twins they just used to eat teams alive with their midrange game. I can remember so many times looking up the clock, and 5 minutes into the game KU would be up like 10 to 15 points, and the Twins would have like 5 mid range jumpers. I guess what I'm saying is sometimes the best offense is taking what the defense gives you.
I know I'm fighting a losing argument, but it's hay, I think I make a strong case.