Here are the stats from the game.
The first thing I'm drawn to is rebounds. We lost that battle by 7. I know we are missing Cheick... but MSU was undermanned in the post, too, perhaps more than us. This was not a big opponent.
We've all been blasting Jamari and Landen (and they can use some pushing from fans), however, the deficiency in rebounds does not come from the performances of these two. In fact, these two led us in rebounds, and without even playing a half of basketball! It is necessary to look at PT and rebounds together to calculate how effective a player was. So who was soft on rebounds? Wayne was extremely soft. Carlton had zero rebounds. Put Svi and Brannen's PT together and it is more than a half of basketball and produced only 1 rebound (together). Perry should also be pulling in more boards, though we put a lot of pressure on him to score.
The next thing I looked for was an outlier. What is glaring in these numbers? Devonte's performance sticks out most to me. 38-minutes of very limited production. He did manage to lead the team with 4 assists. But this wasn't near the effort we should expect out of him. If he can't produce more, we should consider adding size and outside shooting with BG or Svi.
Another area that really sticks out... and this is the nightmare part.... we only had 5 TOs and we lost this game! We all know to expect a lot more TOs in a game, at least twice that many. We took care of the ball that well and we lost. And.. the fact that we could take care of the ball that well doesn't exactly infer anything good about MSU's defense. It all seems to speak to us "playing not to lose" instead of "playing to win." We were NOT aggressive at all on offense! We didn't attack the basket. We didn't attack the defense. We had our guys standing around on their spots where passes could safely be made, even though it wasn't advancing an attack on the goal. I would rather have had 14 TOs and had our guys attacking on offense.
Concerning assists.... we were outperformed by +8 by MSU. That doesn't happen often. We usually have a very high number of assists because we have always pushed "team ball" and "structure" on offense. To score 73 points on only 12 assists says plenty. It spells D I S F U N C T I O N A L / O F F E N S E ! 12 assists? Frank and Devonte together should far eclipse that number every single game!
Other outliers.... how about our FG% and 3pt FG%? We can soon become the "fool's gold" team of America... If we are going to only shoot 20% from trey, we might as well fold up "trey shop" and furgetaboutit! Press all of our guys to attack the basket and use screens... all 5 guys inside the trey line. We might as well forget it. It is fool's gold if we don't run offense for it. Let's just stop shooting them all together. This is #$&% ridiculous! To have some of the best perimeter shooters in the country and we don't run offense for them. WHY?! WHY?! WHY?!
I bet we would win a lot more games ONLY shooting 3s than what we are doing now! And it just so happens that I'm not the only one that thinks this way... the real pros have realized this and are trending more 3s every year. Read this: Chasing 1,000: The NBA's 3-Point Revolution Has Only Just Begun ↗