@Fightsongwriter
Exactly.
Jarrod not only was a player, he was a twister on wood. He was competitive fury personified and he was unique.
I'm not down on Jarrod. I seriously think he is a fine coach and think he could be a guy that shakes coaching out of its last gen mentality.
Every 20-30 years this has to happen. Things are changing scary fast now again. He needs to get out in front and seize the moment.
I'm not saying he needs to become a mindlessly stylish guy.
But for his health and for his family, he needs to lean up a little. And he has a chance where he is to connect basketball to not a fad, but to an apparently long term direction of our culture toward things tech. Basketball has to connect to that, or become a lovable anachronism like rugby.
Basketball is the people's game.
It has adapted and reflected who each generation was and what America was becoming my entire life.
America needs this. The young need this. The old need it.
Jarrod is a man in the right place at the right time with the right instrument.
If he doesn't break the mold some, he's going to be just another Stanford coach that got too conservative to get it done.
Trump, whether I like him or not, is a signal that the times they are a-changin' 2.0.
The guy just made the obvious moves and the media was so used to how things were and were paid so much to oppose change that they didn't "get" him.
No talking head show on TV gets more than 3 million viewers. Add them all up and they probably reach 30-40 million max and more like 10 mil.
Every time Trump tweeted he had 60 million readers!
The media actually thought that if they went in the tank for Hillary and Podesta and used mil-int psy-ops techniques of news engineering that they could manufacture consent for her the same as they had done most of my life. And they are so stubborn they are continuing the old think.
Hillary and the media kept an election close that probably wouldn't have been if she had not been connected to so much corruption and hidden from direct and virtual contact with voters. She believed too much in the old way.
It was a lot like 1960. Nixon should have won going away, but he ran a 1950s election against a 1960s opponent--JFK.
Change, good or bad-- NEVER comes in a landslide.
Hillary won the popular vote by a slim margin and lost the electoral college by a slim margin. Trump won by the skin of his teeth reputedly with CROSSCHECK to close it out. That's the classic way America changes. Closely.
Trump showed that if you used the same mil-int psy ops techniques Hillary did to connect to 60 million instead of 3 million you could keep it close to the end and find a way to close out.
And Trump is just the start.
The cyber change everyone has been noting for 25 years is finally hitting people and changing not just how they work, but how they "think" now.
And Steve's magic bracelet, or something beyond it is really going to cement this nonlinearly very soon. I can feel it.
All great technological waves do this eventually.
Back to Jarrod: I'm just talking about what could be with one of our beloved Jayhawks out at Stanford. Not dogging him. I see potential in him.
But not everyone can change.
I believe Jarrod could.
Rock Chalk!