!0_1510762538369_devonte-graham-kansas-2000-inline.jpg ↗
Our game yesterday with Kentucky was downright ugly. The saving grace was leaving Chicago with a "W."
My focus in that game was clearly on the play of Devonte Graham. He is our point guard, our most-experienced player and the leader of our team. He was also the most-experienced D1 player in this game.
I have to admit; I was frustrated with Devonte's play in this game. He committed many turnovers and took several questionable shots, contributing to his low FG%. It didn't feel like he was always in control.
Towards the end of the game, I started to see Devonte's play in a different light. It was clear that Devonte was often forcing play attempts, resulting in turnovers. It was clear that Devonte was often forcing shot attempts, resulting in missed shots. But should he always be held personally accountable on his play without looking at the play of others?
This is the first year Devonte has been our leader, our soul point guard. Comparing him to Frank Mason... Devonte has more true point guard skills than Frank when relating to running a team. Frank's best skill was related to his ability to get his own shot, which we counted on often to salvage poorly executed team offense.
There is a message we need to take from this game. Don't expect Devonte to be Frank. And why should he be Frank? We need a point guard to run the team far more than we need a point guard that can mainly be successful at creating his own shots.
Devonte "looked bad" last night because our team offense looked bad! Devonte was often put in situations where he had to suddenly become Frank. That isn't fair to Devonte. It isn't fair to just judge this game's play on Devonte. He must carry his share of accountability, but we need to realize that Devonte is only going to be as good as the players around him. That is the way it SHOULD be!
Time will pass... our offense will come together... and Devonte will look much better when he gets the guys around him on the same page.