@JayHawkFanToo Why would it extend "well" into next year? Just do the two weekends of the playoffs over the next three weeks. Then the Final Four would slot in just as it does now. Or, do week one sometime over the next three weekends, then do the second round of 8 teams the New Year's weekend, then the Final Four after that. It only imposes on four teams is all. Four very thankful teams. Traveling might be an issue. So what? Give visiting teams an allotment and they can scalp them online. Or the fans can travel. The home team fans will buy them if they are sold, and fill the house.
Regarding bowls, it is a stupid system and should not stop a better alternative -- if we are really going to determine a champion. Bowls can stay in place for the non-playoff participants, and for the final four. Heck, if you lose before the final four, maybe you have a specified bowl slot. It's ridiculous that Ohio State is shut out. And it would have been ridiculous if Bama was out. It's idiotic that the Pac 12 and Big 10 have no team even participating.
Here's how a 12 team playoff would shape up.
1. Clemson 2. OU 3. Georgia 4. OSU 5. USC 6. Alabama 7. Wisconsin 8. Auburn 9. Penn St. 10. Miami 11. Washington 12. UCF
Byes in Bold
Week 1 -
12 . UCF at 5. USC
11 . Washington at 6. Alabama
10 . Miami at 7. Wisconsin
9 . Penn St. at 8. Auburn
Week 2 (assuming best seed wins)
8 . Auburn at 1. Clemson
7 . Wisconsin at 2. OU
6 . Alabama at 3. Georgia
5 . USC at 4. OSU
The winners then advance to the neutral site final four as is done now.
Please tell this is not worth ANYTHING to get done.
Please tell me why this will not create MORE money.