Thousands of words have been written in here about Bill Self's relationship with the 3-point shot. There has always been something about the trey that has turned off Self. We've heard him complain that our guys go soft on defense because they are focusing too much on living (and dying) by the trey.
Jesse Newell posted a fascinating article that exposes how fortunate Kansas has been in Big 12 play because our opponents are not hitting wide open treys at the same rate they do against other Big 12 opponents. Some like to call this "luck" and therefore Kansas has been "lucky."
Jesse mentions that we shouldn't take our opponent's "trey coldness" for granted moving forward. The warning flags are out. But I'm not sure this trend will change during Big 12 play, though I easily see us losing another game or two by facing a "hot team" in conference play.
I believe, what is carrying Kansas through another challenging Big 12 season on top is our reputation. Go back and watch the early part of our victory at the "Sherronagon." We got out fast and the Wildcats seemed to get called out by Fran Fraschilla. He commented that KSU actually "wanted it too badly." Fran called this one right. And WHY would KSU want it too badly? Is it just because we are rivals? I don't think so. I think our record-breaking conference streak not only impacts the way Kansas plays, but also the way our opponents play. Let's face it.... Bruce Weber has a bit of an inferiority complex against Kansas and Bill Self. He has followed in Bill's shadows for a big part of his career and his results against Bill is not good. When seeing it throughout the history of KU vs KSU during the Self-era it appears that our reputation precedes us. Not only do the Wildcats feel like they are going to lose to us in every game, they bring an added stress to their games, especially their home games, because they fear defeat and looking bad, especially in Manhattan.
When I think of the Big 12 in this light, I feel like certain teams seem to help us stretch our conference streak to the point where they should be recognized for all the help they give us. Top of this list are two teams; KSU and Baylor... while other teams are close behind... ISU and Texas. We do pretty well against other Texas teams, but I just don't see our relationship being as tight with these other schools. Oklahoma has Lon Kruger. He's stomached many losses to us, going back to his days as a player at KSU, but he's crossed over this hurdle. OSU seems to get a bump from it being Bill's old alma mater.
Even though Jesse has the warning flags out, I'm not sure we will see a big difference moving forward in Big 12 play. What worries me is March. In March, we play teams that simply don't know us. Some may get caught up in the "Kansas is so great" history of our program, while other teams have a mindset focused on playing the kind of basketball that got them into the tournament in the first place. These teams pose the biggest threat of sending us home too early by an upset loss.
Kenpom writes about trey efficiency... and his conclusion is that most of the time, defense is not the driving factor on "trey hotness" as much as the offense just executing a high percentage. There are a few teams that seem to have an impact on their opponent's trey results. Teams like Kentucky, Arizona and Baylor.
I see college basketball as being driven almost entirely by the "trey hotness" of each team. Look at the Shockers last overtime loss at Temple. The Shocks missed 14 of their last 15 trey shots. Look at how we pulled away from KSU on Monday. We pulled away with our trey heat in the beginning and created enough buffer that KSU couldn't put long enough streaks together to really come back. And we did this while turning the ball over at a high percentage.
So moving forward, most of our development is based around the idea of making us execute better on defense and offense. Both help our overall chances of winning games. But this developmental strategy doesn't address possible games where we face a hot trey team and are fighting to keep up with them on the scoreboard. Shouldn't we put some focus strictly on how we can better prevent that from happening?
Even though Kenpom implies that defenses don't impact trey hotness like we think they do, I'm not buying into the idea that we can't develop strategies to deal with teams that get hot behind the line against us.
All of this better helps me understand Self's frustration with the trey shot (in general). The trey puts a factor in games which is hard to control, regardless how good our team is and how we are playing.
http://www.kansas.com/sports/college/big-12/university-of-kansas/article197965879.html ↗
https://kenpom.com/blog/offense-vs-defense-3point-percentage/ ↗