@BShark But Silvio's rebounding is much better than Doke .. the gap between Doke and Silvio, per 40, is nearly double the gap between Mitch and Doke. That's pretty amazing. The option of Doke guarding what Nova was throwing at us was a losing proposition and begged an adjustment once it was shown to be a loser.
@jaybate-1-0 Like you, I did find it odd that Mitch didn't get even a cursory look. Mitch has been a spark at times, and he's the best shot blocker we have. He's been a guy Self has relied on and trusted. It was a tool in the tool belt that went unused. It's interesting that @JayHawkFanToo suggested Self "probably saw an unfavorable match-up." But with all that 3-D chess going on, did Self thus not see the unfavorable match-up that kicked our a** in the first 10 minutes?
The point is not whether he may have seen some pregame "unfavorable match-up" -- I'm sure he did, and just thought Doke and Silvio were better. I did too. But that is irrelevant when the game marches on and your gameplan isn't working (working defined not only by the score, but by completely open shots taken by the opponent). Mitch played all season, and then not at all. None. And I understand that when all things are "normal." I"m good with that. But this game was not normal. We appeared to have no answers, and we didn't try a possible answer.
It is a bit more irritating in hindsight. No aggressive press, no trap, no junk defense -- nothing substantive. A few possession of zone, Nova scores, and we scrap it. I look for answers from the bench when things spiral on the court.
The reality is that anything Self did that night may not have been enough. In fact, I think that's the most likely answer. But I sure wish we had tried.
Of course, sometimes, just continuing to chop wood is the answer. Defensively, I don't think anyone thinks that was really the best path playing from behind, given what we saw. But forgetting that, when we get to the last 10 minutes, we have to pull out everything we have. With the season and a possible national championship on the line. And we didn't. That is frustrating.
All that said, Mitch is back, no doubt. Hopefully a 5 year player.
With Cunliffe, if we don't get Langford, there is a path were he could actually be a starter -- shooting on this team would be at a premium and he might offer that. But it's pretty obvious he was not the favored child this past season.