Starting in 19-20. I wonder if this will replace the SEC Challenge?
Could be playing Nova annually now..
Starting in 19-20. I wonder if this will replace the SEC Challenge?
Could be playing Nova annually now..
I like it better. We actually recruit out of areas we would play. Chicago, New York, Philadelphia. Much better than playing Lexington every year.
@Kcmatt7 I like an annual Kentucky game (Champions Classic/SEC challenges has made that possible); garners lots of national attention. I hope it continues in one form or another. There is plenty of room in the non-con to do both challenges (2 games) if the desire is there. One of Kentucky/Florida and Villanova/Xavier every year would be great as the college basketball landscape currently lays.
Big10 has 14 members
Big12 has 10 members
Pac12 actually has 12
Branding got in the way of making sense.
@BeddieKU23 I like the the current challenge but I think good match ups in Jan or Feb are better than the champions classic in early Nov.
kjayhawks said:
@BeddieKU23 I like the the current challenge but I think good match ups in Jan or Feb are better than the champions classic in early Nov.
I don't mind the Champions Classic. You get an extremely early feel of where a team is at and it never hurts beating a Duke/UK/Sparty on national TV and having some bragging rights.
Will be interesting to see if this is replacing the SEC Challenge or becomes another standalone series
@kjayhawks I agree. While the Champions Classic is great for KU and college basketball as a whole the games are usually pretty sloppy. A lot of it has to do with Duke, UK, and KU usually having so many freshman garnishing big minutes.
If KU does Champions Classic, plus Big 12/SEC and Big 12/Big East, plus an early season tournament (Maui, NIT, etc.), and a non-con road test, the non conference schedule will be very strong every year. That's not a bad slate.