Kansas is not known as a guard-oriented school. We've certainly had several top notch guards over the past decade, but our reputation is that we are a big man school.
I think we've built our reputation as a big man school over the past few decades... maybe going back even further because we were fortunate to have the very best big man ever to play the game, Wilt Chamberlain.
Danny Manning took the torch from Chamberlain and brought us national acclaim by leading us to a National Championship in 1988. Danny extended his impact on Kansas big man basketball from 2007 to 2012 as an assistant coach and big man specialty coach.
Bill Self's offensive strategy is based first on a hi/lo set. The focus of the hi/lo is to make the post players the center of where the offense runs. On a typical possession running the hi/lo at least one post player will touch the ball several times, often leading to the shot coming from the post, or the assist coming from out of the post. The offensive focus of Kansas basketball goes through our big men.
But today, we can't help but look at teams like UCONN and admire their performance and reputation for being the best March team for the past decade or so. As competitors we should always stay open minded for improving our methods for developing competitive teams in March.
UCONN has proven the importance of a "guard first" strategy going into March. UCONN is known as a guard school. They typically bring a team to the tournament every year that has tough, scrappy, capable guards at both the 1 and 2 spots. This year, the tandem of Napier and Boatright helped propel them over a dominant all star Kentucky team.
So how can Kansas become more competitive at the guard position?
We need to stir the pot and make some changes that will build our reputation as a good choice for quality guards.
The first big change would be to shuffle in one more assistant coach. This assistant won't be hired strictly for what recruiting territory he is good in. This assistant will be recruited for his skills developing guard play. A new feature we need to offer moving forward.
I have my ideas of a good candidate for this position. He is an assistant now at UCONN. Let's not forget Andrew Hudy was from UCONN before we lured her away.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Hobbs ↗
I have to admit not being the best source on guard coaching... but he seems to be a qualified guard coach with a reputation working with great guards.
Then... I'm not saying we should abandon the hi/lo... but what about running more of a combo offense? It sort of seems we do that now, but in the future put more focus on developing a combo offense that utilizes both the hi/lo and maybe some kind of motion offense like dribble drive. We should be able to just veer slightly off our traditional hi/lo to make this work. Opponents shouldn't know on any particular possession if we will finish the play through a hi/lo creation, or from whatever twist we are running with it, like a dribble drive. Granted, dribble drive usually puts 4 players out away from the basket, but we could at least run 3 players out and sometimes 4 if we have the right big man who can absorb that much defensive intensity by himself.
I'm not sure exactly what I am trying to convey here, except to open up for change that will encourage more finishes for our guards. Something that we can sell to quality guard recruits.
We have to take on a healthy amount of change if we want to gain a reputation for also being a guard school. We shouldn't have to sacrifice our reputation for being a big man school in the process... just diversify a bit.