@jaybate-1.0
"One must first understand how to learn, before they can learn"
True "Woodenism!"
Very nice read, JB. Love your focus on the spatial aspect of everything, especially pertaining to basketball.
X-axis basketball is all about taking advantage of space. Focusing on the game beyond just the vertical height and leaping ability because only a small part of the game is played up there above the rim. Most of the game is below the rim... most of the game is from around the 6' area on down. That height owns most of the passing trajectories, screens, ball handling, fakes, positioning for rebounds, passes and scoring... even running.
We've all fallen in love with the high-flying jams and blocks. It has warped our sense of understanding. It makes us scratch our heads every time a team like UCONN wins ANOTHER National Championship.
The game of basketball is nothing more than a game of logistics. Find a way to take a basketball and run it through a hole as many times as possible while trying to stop your opponent from doing the same thing. It really starts there (and ends there, too!).
I'm surprised more people don't study the math behind it. And how about more creativity with positions. Isn't it one big game of chess? I know many football coaches get that. I know Andy Reid gets it... and he sure used it last night when he blew out the Pats.
Let's take what sounds like a ludicrous idea (with our current concept of "slam-jam basketball" ) and try to defend it.
We are playing a team with a star 7-footer in the post, and our post player is getting dominated.
Is it possible that our best match-up on their big man is none other than Conner Frankamp? 165 lbs, 5'11" (without KU inches).
Let's say that Conner is now the same scoring threat as he was in HS. Bombing those 3s...
Now, is the 7-footer going to be able to contain Conner from the perimeter? I doubt it. Will Conner be able to contain the footer in the post? I doubt it. The post basket is 2 points. The perimeter basket is 3 points.
Granted... the game isn't this simple. Or is it? Chances are, our opponent will shuffle their defense out of their M2M and go zone, or flip defenders on hot Conner. Will that work? Maybe. Maybe not.
The key is the complexion of the game can change quickly if the coaching perspective changes. That's what Andy Reid did last night to play the most dominant half of football Belichick has ever faced. That was the reason why KC smacked NE.
Utilizing a weapon like Frankamp can do the same thing. It creates a challenging juxtaposition that sometimes can not be overcome by opponents.
Checkmate.