@wissox said in Open as a 18 1/2 point dog to Texas:
Turning into a rout after the ill advised 4th and short call.
Heard a lot of chatter this week about this call. A lot of fans wondering why not just sneak it? I've heard two pretty decent arguments for the call but would be interested if anyone here has any others.
The first is that KU by running that play was staying true to their identity as an offense. And many have pointed out that with proper execution, the call itself probably would have worked. I can buy this. I've seen a ton of praise for Andy K and his creativity as a OC. Why change in the biggest moment?
The second is that UT's strength on their highly talented Defense is the D line, specifically the tackles. Meaning a sneak would be going right at their absolute best players. Would KU's O line have been able to get significant push against the best players on that Texas D? This argument works for me as well.
The third argument I've heard, doesn't hold as much water for me. That is the one where maybe Bean hasn't practiced much under center and is more comfortable in the shotgun. Going under center for a sneak would be risking a muffed snap and a turnover in an important situation. Two reasons this argument sucks. 1. Bean is a quarterback, he has to know how to take a snap under center. If we are afraid of a turnover from that, why in the world give him the biggest decision of the game on a triple option that guess what, ended in a fumble!? 2. We've seen KU run a successful sneak this year. It was called back because of a penalty. But the person taking the snap wasn't Bean, wasn't even JD, it was Jarod Casey! My fan brain with hindsight says put Casey under center on 4th and inches and let him be the Hero in Austin AGAIN.
But alas as the great Jackson Browne wrote, "And while the future's there for anyone to change, still you know it seems, It would be easier sometimes to change the past."