To elaborate a bit more on my Lucas point, and my "heart" point:
Now this is just my personal belief, but I think from a plateaued-ability level, the decision to play Lucas any meaningful mpg is a mgmt. decision. Yes, KU bball is big biz. So, I feel Self has a decision to make. Lucas is NOT the main engine that will drive us or this team, is he?? (key point)
Now if Mason, or Sherron, or Devonte, or Perry have a bad day/missed bunnies/missed 3s...I am way more "OK" with that loss (relatively speaking) --> simply because if your main horses are going to misfire, then it just isn't going to happen that day (think 80% Sherron vs. UNI). I will never be mad at Sherron (or Mason), because as team leaders, as their fortunes go, so goes KU's.
We cannot hide behind the oversimplification of "one team"--> it is more complex than that.
True we did not guard the 3, and offensively went away from Ellis...and missed 1 of 2 FT's TWICE in a close contest. But, this is about building that 12pt lead, stepping on the throat. The 1 post-seal I saw Lucas do, and he got a perfect hi-low post feed from Devonte, Lucas does a 2 ft airball off the glass. Inept. Cant do it.
Perry needs help. Maybe the offense went away from Ellis due to double teams, and that will happen more and more, as teams figure out Lucas' limited role & ability.
I agree with @HighEliteMajor on this one, regarding Bragg or Hunter vs Lucas.
Just my opinion, likely at odds with Self (who cares, really?): Hunter + Jamari at the 5. Ellis and Bragg (Ellis' sub, since Bragg scorer and defense stretcher) at the 4. Hunter gives rim protection, rebounding, has a face up J, and foot quickness. Jamari gives hustle and energy. He finds the ball. He is a scrapper. He hits his FTs. And, let's not forget another key fact: Traylor, whatever limitations his game has, he does not lack confidence most of the time. He is at the very least a "motivated athlete". He actually has some ups. He actually can put pressure on the D with his dribble drive.
Jamari Traylor (4th big) is a net positive.
Hunter Mickelson coulda/woulda/shoulda been a net positive. The rim protection alone would affect a few possessions, and if he makes 2 buckets more than Lucas...(dot, dot, dot...)
Bragg? Simply needs mpg to prove he's a net positive, and likely the #2 big behind Ellis.
Lucas = net negative. 4 or 5 possessions where he was a neg impact, and I mean at that critical time when we had the 12 point lead. And, ladies and gentlemen, how many times do we have to see a senior do the "moving screen" call. So really, that's 6-7 possessions affected.
Remember, I will take Mason/Sherron/Tyshawn driving it, because Self likely is trying to take advantage of the new rules, and driving starter guards are your main engine. If they cant hit their bunnies like the 08Champs couldn't in 07 vs UCLA in the Elite8, its just not meant to be.
I'll always bet on guys like Mason/Sherron/Tyshawn, but I just cannot bet on Lucas anymore, if that makes basketball sense to those who have played this game at any level?