@nuleafjhawk
I would be grateful to anyone going back and finding proof refuting the reputed story that Roy promised to recruit west of the Mississippi, when Roy took the elite KU job (note: KU's storied program had just won a ring and LB's recruiting infraction and KU's NCAA penalty at least appear relatively minor in retrospect) as a UNC assistant to Dean that had never been a D1, or D2, head coach. Please do so, as soon as you can, if time and resources permit you to. I look forward to reading your research. Your doubts about this reputed story mean it needs to be resolved for the sake of THE LEGACY and future fans by someone with the resources and time to do so.
But, AGAIN, until the reputed story were refuted by such future research, what might we make of the apparently long overlooked question, which I would like to rephrase as follows: is there any corresponding reputed story that Dean imposed a reputed complementary restriction on himself, and UNC, also (i.e. focusing most of his recruiting east of the Mississippi, or alternatively perhaps agreeing to compete head to head mostly only in the western US), and why would he, at the peak of his career, have done such a thing?
I don't have a recollection on this, and I don't have an explanation that makes sense to me yet.
I do recall Dean had suffered through John Wooden's run of cornering much of the top talent out on the West Coast, plus cherry picking top players in the east (Jabbar) and midwest (Lucious Allen). After Wooden retired, Dean was in his prime and seemingly positioned to win a lot of rings, recruiting the whole country. But so were others.
For perspective, Bob Knight reputedly used to not want his assistants and proteges to take jobs in the the same conference Knight coached in. I vaguely recall that Steve Alford taking the Iowa job reputedly triggered some conflict with Knight. At the same time, I don't recall that Knight ever reputedly set any arbitrary boundaries about where he would and would not recruit and he won four NCAA rings, if I recall correctly.
Dean, oddly, won just two, despite an impressive run of talent, wherever he reputedly recruited.
It occurred to me that framing the question this way; i.e., with the speculative focus more on Dean, than on Roy, might unstick some new thinking on this reputed story.
I would be especially happy, if exploring this reputed story of Roy recruiting half the country this way would also lead to it being refuted entirely. Wouldn't that be great?
But either way, it seems a reputed story that deserves some continued reflection about.
Recollection suggests that Sonny, Dean and Roy may all have been in some kind of contact at UNC at, or near, the birth of the Michael Jordan marketing phenomenon.
I wonder if this reputed recruiting agreement between Dean and Roy might have had any basis in shoe marketing and its reputed influence on D1 talent?
"Sole Influence: Basketball, Corporate Greed, and the Corruption of America's Youth" (2001) by Dan Wetzel and Don Yaeger, and "College Sports, Inc.: The Athletic Department vs. the University," (1991) by Murray Sperber, might be two good books for you to read for more information about recruiting as background. I recommend these books often, because though old, and apparently not necessarily perfectly flawless, I don't recall ever reading that the troubling issues addressed in these books have ever been conclusively refuted, broadly remedied and/or eliminated from college sports since. Maybe they have, and I have missed it, but I don't recall the NCAA, or Bob Knight, for two examples, claiming that these issues have been broadly eliminated, though they probably have evolved over the decades since.
As always, great to hear from you.