!ku_bkc_baylor20-1200x742.jpg ā
Okay.... how do we get our butts kicked in the first half, then come out and make a 25-point gain in 10 minutes? Are we taking our cues from Mahomes and the Chiefs? Maybe...
Let's get this straight immediately... HOFr coaches like Bill Self and Andy Reid (Eagles HOFr) prefer winning the 2nd half of games over winning the 1st halfs. That makes sense... having our comeback be the last comeback in the game. Surely there is more to all of this... can't we just beat down top teams from the beginning to the end? Well....
Let's state some hypotheticals. In the middle of games, is it easier for the team behind to raise their level of play, or is it easier for the team ahead to raise their level of play even higher? Seems to be the first. Another hypothetical, which situation is lesser of a bummer; being outplayed from the beginning of the game, or being outplayed later in the game after you won the early part of the game? I think it is easier for a coach to convince his players they started slow instead of convincing them to regain their motivation after already having it in a game.
So should we just concede the first half of games? I don't think Self wants this either... but how about if we go down by just a few points before half? Would that be enough to really get our guys turned up the second half?
I think we need Jesse Newell. He's always been our source for statistics when we need them. I bet he could run the stats on the Self era. What are our point totals in the second half of games where we trail in the first half? And when we lead in the first half? Is it different numbers for some teams and some coaches that really stick out? Win/loss record based on where we were after the first half?
Many of us have challenged Coach Self on not bringing teams ready to play. Is this by design? Or is it possible he is a better motivator when his players are playing from behind?
Jaybate... where are you?
Are we really 25 points better than Baylor in 10 minutes? I guess so since it happened, but we shouldn't make a statement like this is apples playing apples. If it was then Baylor is also 13 points better than us in a half.
How do games change this drastically?
I believe not every team can easily run up a 25-point advantage on other teams like we can. When we own the mojo, we turn TOs into quick points, often treys. When we own mojo our half-court offense moves the ball better than any NBA team.
I should define "mojo" before going further. To me, mojo starts with self-confidence and ends with hustle, high-energy, moving feet, having mental focus and awareness, and attacking on both sides of the court which creates effectiveness on both sides of the court. Typically, the basket gets big because energy, focus, and clarity help bring up shooting percentages.
Does that explain why we outscored Baylor by 25 in 10 minutes? No. In most situations, there is only so much mojo in a game! If mojo grows for one team, it usually comes from the other team. All that energy, clarity, and effectiveness Baylor brought to the first half, we owned in the second half, and they didn't! This is so important to understand in competitive sports. Knowing that for everything you may have lost in part of the game can flip the other way, too. Most teams can't keep their mojo for 40 minutes.
This Self team doesn't give up. They are capable of flipping the tide in games, even by scoring +25 on a Top 10 team like Baylor. Self mentions how tough this team is. This is why. Right here.
This does not represent the entire spectrum for proving toughness. How do we respond to playing a team that doesn't dip for 40 minutes? This is the perfect question to ask going into March. Can we go head-to-head with a team that doesn't give away their mojo? I'm saying this at the right time because didn't we suffer a complete beatdown from TCU at home?
I heavily advise we come out strong against TCU and not count on a second-half comeback. This tactic did not work the first time with TCU!