@JayHawkFanToo
I hate the fact that the officiating is such that we cannot reflect on a game -- even relish in a win -- without discussing the refs.
But it's undeniable.
There is simply too much judgement and latitude bestowed within the refs today. Leagues (NCAA, NBA and NFL) allow this and maybe even foster it as it can be an equalizer that creates more exciting games. (Warriors vs Cavaliers anyone? Patriots, Panthers and Seahawks?) To the viewer -- the consumer of these products -- it appears that refs influence the game to the point of overt manipulation.
For the love of the game, they have to STOP IT.
How? I'm not sure.
I suspect that technology could play a role to remove human errors and subjectivity.
Instant replay has helped with baseball, and may play a niche role in Basketball and Football, but is not a the solution. Part of what makes these games fun is the fast pace. Increasing replay would ruin the flow and lengthen the games far too much.
More likely, some sort of system can cross-reference a database of plays and quickly compares the precedent for a call. Imagine if, after a call like the hustle play that Josh Jackson made trying to steal the ball, there was a way to look at 20 similar plays -- taking into account position of players, etc -- and could quickly determine that this play results in a "Jump Ball" call 80% of the time, "no call" 10% of the time, foul on the player in position A 7% of the time and foul on player in position B 3% of the time.
This kind of analysis, on a portfolio of plays during a game, could be used to 'grade' the refs and keep them in check -- essentially normalizing the way they call the game.
This kind of system would allow anyone to review the calls from a given ref and tell whether they were making irregular calls or standard calls. That would eliminate the speculation of fans and probably eliminate the refs that speculate.