Today's loss was definitely a surprise. If I would have had to guess, I would have said a loss on Monday night was much more probable than losing at home to the cryclones. We were cruising in the first half and were in control up 14. Then the second half started out with two or three straight turnovers and Landen missing a pair of free throws. That to me says our guys were not mentally in the game. They thought they were in control and could coast as usual to an easy W on a Saturday afternoon.
Iowa State easily played their best game of the year. Just like Oregon, they hit a school record number of threes which propelled them to a W. Basically, both feasted on a large helping of fool's gold. Whenever you have to hit a record number of threes to win, that to me is fool's gold.
My main issue with Self's coaching today is the lack of game plan to stop their shooters. So: what do you do to stop hot three point shooting? Jesse Newell had an article a while back that says it doesnt matter if a guy is guarded or not - the percentage of makes doesnt change. Coming from a player, this is simply nonsense and, if I may say so, foolish thinking. To combat ISU, you have to get right in their grill and MAKE them dribble and make a move. It was clear to all that they were super hot in the second half and that something should be done. You have to force them to shoot over the top in the paint. I know that ISU had a few very contested shots, but far too many were open enough that they were not rushed or forced, which means that guys like Svi and Josh did not disrupt the shooters nearly enough.
So where does that leave us moving forward? I was reading a comment on another site and it said that in 04-05, KU won at Kentucky, at Iowa State, then lost to Iowa State at home, and we all remember how that season just got worse and worse after a really good start. First off, the two teams are drastically different. Secondly, we haven't seen this year's team play amazing to start the season then taper off - their level of play has been fairly consistent. Thirdly, I think this year's squad is more dynamic because of the four guard lineup. Have we lost yet because we are "shorter" and "don't have a shot blocker"? No. Having Dok, IMO, wouldn't have won us the game today because our guards were so sloppy with the ball and ISU made their comeback with the three, not the two. We were successful when our guards, on a few possessions, forced them off the three point line.
The truth is, we aren't going to lose a single game this year because we don't have a shot blocker. To me, people have followed the media's narrative that at the University of Kansas, unless you have a rim protector, you aren't going to succeed. Of course, I have listed all of the teams that made the final four without a Joel Embiid or Karl Anthony Towns, so clearly this narrative is bull.
The game Monday is going to be, IMO, our toughest test yet. Bruce can really coach, his guys play good D, shoot the ball well and on top of that the crowd will be fired up. Personally, I think this one will be an L, but the key to winning will be 1. drive and kick every possession 2. having around 12 turnovers or fewer 3. drive their shooters off the 3 point line. So basically, do the things we need to do every game.
These situations suck, but one thing to remember is Villanova last year lost in the BE tournament to Seton Hall, North Carolina last year lost at home to Duke, Duke in 2015 lost by 20 at home to Miami, UConn in 2014 lost by 30 to Louisville a few weeks before the tourney, and Louisville in 2013 had a three game losing streak. Sometimes, tough losses just happen. But what shows the character and toughness of a team is how they play their next games after that.
I think Monday's game will decide where this team will go. Will they bounce back like the veteran, experienced team that they are? Or will they be like the 05 team and fold under the pressure. We will find out shortly.