So by now we've breathed a collective sigh of relief after escaping Eastern Kentucky. We're all still probably replaying the Traylor & Wiggins highlights in our heads. And most surprisingly, we're all smiling and shaking our heads at the performance of Connor Frankamp. Before getting into the meat of this let me just say kudos to coach Self for expanding his bench and continuing to give players like Frankamp & Greene minutes all year. They didn't get into every game, but they got into enough of them that they won't be overwhelmed if called upon this tournament.
Now if I may direct your attention to a quote from Eastern Kentucky forward Eric Stutz: "We went into the game knowing that we could turn their starting point guard over. That was our game plan." Look, I know the Colonels are a scrappy team full of pesky guards and their calling cards are raining 3s and creating turnovers, but let that quote sink in. 15 seed Eastern Kentucky from the Ohio Valley conference KNEW they would be able to turn over the junior starting point guard for number 2 seeded Kansas. What else do you really need to know? In classic Tharpe fashion, he turned it over on the second possession of the game, and generally looked uncomfortable all game long when trying to run the offense. In the second half, Self played him almost exclusively at the 2 with either Frankamp or Mason in the game with him.
If that wasn't enough to convince you, we were also witness to more below average defense from Naadir. Due to Eastern Kentucky's 4 guard line-up and the general good job we did switching it was at times difficult to determine whose man was scoring, but Glenn Cosey hit three treys in the game's first 5 minutes, and at least 2 of them were on Naadir. He was consistently a step behind his man, which led to help defense from his teammates being needed which in turn created quite a bit of offense for the Colonels. Perhaps another thing that made Naadir's defense standout as particular horrid was that Perry Ellis actually played pretty stout on that end of the floor, so the weak link wasn't a shared title between the two (as is often the case).
Again, these were guys from Eastern Kentucky. Not Kane or Staten or Smart beasting him. This wasn't him not being able to match-up with the elite guards in the country as some have suggested. He didn't look like he belonged on the same court as guys from the Ohio Valley conference.
So despite being very pleased with surviving & advancing, I still found myself scratching my head throughout the game and for a long time afterwards. Why did Mason play so sparingly? 9 minutes to Tharpe's 21? Don't get me wrong, I'm glad that Self recognized Frankamp's value and played him as much as he did. But again, this was Eastern Kentucky. What happens when we play Syracuse or Florida down the road? Will he continue to stubbornly reinsert Tharpe in the game in hopes that his play will yield different results?
This is a team that can contend for a National Championship. I'm pretty confident we can get by Stanford. Then we will have Embiid back. Wiggins is surging at the right time. Almost all of the pieces are in place. But we need steady PG play. Self has two options that to me seem vastly more appealing. The time is now for the lion's share of the minutes to go to Mason & Frankamp. Is it risky? I suppose. Both Mason & Frankamp are freshman. Self would open himself up to criticism should one of them cost us down the road, whereas he is less apt to be second guessed if he stays the course with the upperclassman. That is the safe path. The bolder path gives us the better chance to play for the highest stakes.