šŸ€ KuBuckets Archive

Read-only archive of KuBuckets.com (2013-2025)
DeSousa
Nov 27, 2017 11:37 PM #1

Self says realistic best-case scenario for Silvio De Sousa joining team, if all goes through, would be for Big 12 opener vs. Texas.

Coming straight out of high school, not knowing the offense, not knowing when to help or switch on defense. Will he be helpful or in the way disrupting the flow of the game?

Nov 28, 2017 12:11 AM #2

At this point just having another body to call upon would be nice.

Nov 28, 2017 12:16 AM #3

@DoubleDD bingo. We need depth, defense and rebounding. If Silvio can provide that, then we good fam.

Nov 28, 2017 04:49 AM #4

Diallo only missed 5 games and could never really seem to get it going and has been around the program all semester. Wouldn’t have high hopes for Silvio. We all know Self has a short leash for blown defensive assignments. On the other hand, maybe 3-5 min a game is all Doke will need.

Nov 28, 2017 05:19 AM #5

@Blown Cheick is a completely different player than Silvio. When I watch Silvio, what I see is someone who is under control and has good basketball iq. C heick on the other hand, well let's just say he's still figuring things out in the nba.

Nov 28, 2017 10:47 AM #6

Wasn't his comments more geared to when he'd be available to play as opposed to when he'd join the team and start practicing?

It sounds like he'll be with the team earlier then the Texas game if all goes well with paperwork etc.

@3genhawk

It's a good question to ask. Listening to Self's comments yesterday about the offense it seems the 4-1 is here to stay with this group no matter who's eligible to play. He notices that playing 2 big's is not as good as playing his 4 guards.
If that's true then the impact that Silvio will be asked to provide is going to be minimal. If Lightfoot, potentially Preston & Silvio are backups to Doke then we may never see Silvio in meaningful minutes the whole season.

Self will have greater lineup flexibility to go bigger if needed. That could be useful in situations where we face teams that can punish us for playing 4 guards. If he's good enough he'll find a way into the rotation and certainly his reputation would seem to support that he's talented enough to do so. If not he's a useful practice body, a useful player to put in at end of game situations where KU has the lead and wants to rest its starters.

Nov 28, 2017 02:22 PM #7

If Billy isn’t able to go, which at this point seems to be the case we will without question need another big. We have already seen a 6’5 walk on forced to play at the 5, but that doesn’t work against a decent team. Mitch has looked good the last few games but asking him to stay outta foul trouble against good bigs will be a very tall order.

Nov 28, 2017 02:40 PM #8

@kjayhawks "tall order" :laughing:

Nov 28, 2017 04:23 PM #9

Silvio will be another great body to practice against, he may be able to earn some minutes by the end of the season. But if not he could redshirt to maintain his eligibility and have 6 months of practice under his belt before his debut. I hate how thin we are in the post, but if Preston comes back Silvio becomes a luxury.

This season KU needs more guard depth as much as anything. Cunliff giving the guys a breather sure will help. In Svi’s best game he was horribly winded for a 5-8 minute stretch and it would’ve been nice to put his dragging butt on the bench. A good team could’ve taken advantage on d while KUs over tired.

Nov 28, 2017 04:47 PM #10

@Blown

I don't believe we can compare Diallo and DeSouza. Diallo had very little experience playing basketball and a very lo basketball IQ; his athleticism was way above average but it could not compensate for the other shortcomings. Diallo was mostly about future potential and a less so on current, tangible skills. DeSouza has been playing longer and has a lot more experience having played for his National Team and has shown he has usable skill available now. I am confident he will catch on relatively quickly.

Nov 28, 2017 05:20 PM #11

Silvio definitely knows how to play ball.

@dylans Redshirting him only makes sense if he plans to exhaust his eligibility. I don't see that being the case.

Nov 28, 2017 05:42 PM #12

It is just too hard to say what impact Silvio will have.

His contribution could show obvious from Day 1. Or maybe we don't see a huge benefit until later.

He may contribute in every game, or just in a few games where we need more post help.

We should definitely view him as help because we need more post people. He will surely help us in practices, too!

His impact will also relate to if we get Billy back.

I look at Silvio as an insurance policy!

Nov 28, 2017 07:59 PM #13

Whether Silvio can step on the court and ball? Isn't really the important issue. It's a body to at the very least steal a few minutes. I'm afraid Coach doesn't have the luxury of bringing this kid along slowly. I would also point there is a reason Silvio is reclassifying so he can play this year.

It wouldn't make sense to reclassify to this year and then take a red shirt?

I'm pretty sure Coach more than likely wants him too reclassify.

Something to think about.

Nov 28, 2017 08:10 PM #14

@DoubleDD self has already said he would be an immediate impact. His words not mine

Nov 28, 2017 08:16 PM #15

@DoubleDD

Part of the reason he's trying to enroll early is the fact that De Sousa will have completed 8 semesters of HS by end of the December so he can't play for IMG anyway. He'd have to sit until the fall to play again and it sounds like he doesn't want to do that if he can join early. It sounds like they don't expect him to be here 4 years so Silvio isn't worried about losing the half semester he would forfeit. If he doesn't play this season much for whatever reason he certainly has a leg up towards next season.

Nov 28, 2017 08:26 PM #16

BeddieKU23 said:

@DoubleDD

Part of the reason he's trying to enroll early is the fact that De Sousa will have completed 8 semesters of HS by end of the December so he can't play for IMG anyway. He'd have to sit until the fall to play again and it sounds like he doesn't want to do that if he can join early. It sounds like they don't expect him to be here 4 years so Silvio isn't worried about losing the half semester he would forfeit. If he doesn't play this season much for whatever reason he certainly has a leg up towards next season.

Yeah when you read the quotes from his guardian, there is no way he is sticking around to graduate. On the bright side he also isn't really planning to be OAD either.

I'd lean towards 2 (so 1 and a half I guess) years. It would make a lot of sense given 2019 recruits KU wants to take in and guys that should still be on the roster for sure like McCormack. A JR season wouldn't shock me though.

Nov 28, 2017 08:32 PM #17

@BeddieKU23 that’s pretty much how I see it. I just throw out the extremely unlikely possibility of a redshirt in the event that Preston comes back, the 4-1 is the mainstay, and Silvio isn’t ready yet. I expect he will play catch-up most of the season surpassing Lightfoot 1/2- 2/3 the way thru the conference season. If he’s not going to be here for four years no sense in saving eligibility, but Svi was a 2ad supposedly and Rush was a oad- you never fully know how it’s going to turn out developmentally or injury wise.

Nov 28, 2017 08:40 PM #18

@dylans

Definitely, I think the sweet spot for Silvio would be expecting a Jr year out of him. But he's already 19 and has a mature physically ready body so its going to be all about development and playing time for him before he leaves. He can make jumpers and is an above average athlete (I'm probably selling that aspect short) so we are talking about someone who can play the modern day 4 position (maybe similar to how Perry Ellis was roaming his Sr year). I think he could definitely play the 5 here as well as he rebounds and does defend the rim.

We might not have the same kind of firepower to run a 4-1 next season. Next years squad looks to be a real wildcard right now

Nov 28, 2017 08:42 PM #19

@BeddieKU23 lots of big man talent next year. It’ll be way different than this season. The post would be crazy deep if Dok comes back.

Nov 28, 2017 08:42 PM #20

If Preston comes back for his SO year I will delete my account. :joy:

Nov 28, 2017 08:44 PM #21

@BShark I’m just hoping for one (half) season...

Nov 28, 2017 10:06 PM #22

Just read from another site, and hoping someone here has either also heard this or read this, hoping someone can confirm.

Read where the walk on from the football team James Sosinski is now with the team and is practicing with the team. - - 6'7 - -260.- He has played basketball before , posted pretty decent numbers in Juco 19.2 ppg and 12.6 rpg - -again we really don't need huge numbers from him if this is the case - would just be good to have a bigger body that could help with some spot minutes during foul troubled situations. - -Has anyone else heard anything of this? - -ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY

Nov 28, 2017 10:08 PM #23

BShark said:

If Preston comes back for his SO year I will delete my account. :joy:

You can breathe easy my friend - -Preston won't be back at KU for his soph season - - So let it be Written - -So let it be done - - ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY

Nov 28, 2017 10:20 PM #24

@jayballer54 if true that's good news!

Nov 28, 2017 10:25 PM #25

@3genhawk

Guesstimate Defense: He will be third back up and they will play junk zone, when he is in.

Guesstimate offense: use him to set ball screens to get him out of the way on offense.
Otherwise he just camps backside and tries for rebounds.

Nov 28, 2017 10:28 PM #26

@jayballer54

Awesome if true. And keep him next season. Never enough 260 pounders inside.

Nov 28, 2017 10:29 PM #27

@jayballer54

Classic exchange the both of you!

Nov 28, 2017 10:36 PM #28

Sosinski will be crucial against Krzyzewski (/ŹƒÉŖĖˆŹ’É›fski/ shih-ZHEF-skee).

He gives us a good match-up in consonants.

He will also keep all the biased, Eastern SPorts Network broadcasters tongue tied whenever he runs by and talks trash to Krzyzewski (/ŹƒÉŖĖˆŹ’É›fski/ shih-ZHEF-skee).

Rkck Chlhckski

Nov 28, 2017 10:40 PM #29

One more thing I like about Sosinski—the first three letters of his last name: SOS.

Self sent out an SOS inside and the big guy responded like an absolute Jayhawk!!!

Nov 28, 2017 10:42 PM #30

Last add: gotta see Doke and SOS on the floor together. Serious ball screening!!!

Nov 28, 2017 10:46 PM #31

@jaybate-1-0
Rkck Chlhckski Classic! We need more Polish players I think.

Nov 28, 2017 10:57 PM #32

@3genhawk at least the season opener is against Texas. Right now their bigs are a bunch of Knuckleheads as well.

Nov 29, 2017 12:32 AM #33

Well like I posted earlier, per rumor about Sosinski - -haven't heard anymore, haven't had anyone confirm it- - so - -I don't know if he is with the team or not. - -They haven't mentioned it any on any of the pre game yet so I don't know. - -ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY

Nov 29, 2017 03:12 AM #34

@jayballer54 I don't think Coach would be keeping it a secret if Sosinski were being considered. My feeling is we will roll with what we have and hope De Sousa and Preston joins the team shortly. If one or both do not work out, then he would be a huge need. However it works out, any of those three would take some time to mesh with the team. Hoping for the best outcome.

Dec 02, 2017 05:02 PM #35

CRH107 said:

@jayballer54 nailed it.

From Jesse Newell:

"As far as Silvio De Sousa goes, his potential early enrollment at KU appears to have hit a speed bump this week. De Sousa will need a better score on a standardized test Saturday to be eligible to join KU this month."

Not the news, I was hoping to receive.

Dec 02, 2017 06:02 PM #36

Should we call in a chit from Cal and have him not know about a Memphis alum arranging a surrogate test taker for de Sousa to help get de Sousa eligible for KU?

Just joking!!!!

Really!

Dec 03, 2017 01:59 AM #37

Today was a big day for De Sousa and Solinski. If De Sousa passes the test and can play later this month, Solinski probably won’t be needed.

Dec 03, 2017 02:56 AM #38

Just read today that DeSousa has to do better on his standardized test. Not a sure thing.

Dec 03, 2017 04:38 AM #39

So when do you think KU will know the results of his tests?

Dec 03, 2017 04:40 AM #40

@Gorilla72 what is the exact test he took?

Dec 03, 2017 04:47 AM #41

As I understand it, it’s not the SAT or ACT, but a test to correlate his high school grades. Apparently to verify he learned what he was supposed to overseas. Something of a sliding scale -good grades mean a lower score is acceptable and vice-versa. I’ve not seen the name of the test mentioned in any article or post.

Dec 03, 2017 04:51 AM #42

It’s either the SAT or ACT. Have to have one, coupled with your GPA, to be a full qualifier to play NCAA sports.

Dec 03, 2017 04:56 AM #43

@FarmerJayhawk how quickly do they inform you of the results?

Dec 03, 2017 05:29 AM #44

@FarmerJayhawk, I don’t believe the ACT or SAT were offers either weekend. Per TOS.

Dec 03, 2017 05:33 AM #45

Those are the only 2 the NCAA accepts. It’s usually a couple weeks last I knew. But I haven’t brushed up in quite awhile. It may be faster now.

Dec 03, 2017 05:41 AM #46

Regarding the test, the Topeka CJ refers to it as a ā€œstandardized testā€. He’s taken it once and apparently he didn’t score well. Hence, he’s taking it again. I dunno, but don’t think it’s the SAT or ACT. ???
http://cjonline.com/sports/hawkzone/2017-11-09/ku-basketball-commit-silvio-de-sousa-seeking-ncaa-approval-play-year ↗

Dec 03, 2017 01:09 PM #47

FarmerJayhawk said:

Those are the only 2 the NCAA accepts. It’s usually a couple weeks last I knew. But I haven’t brushed up in quite awhile. It may be faster now.

2 weeks seems too optimistic- wonder if he puts KU down to receive the score or if he can put the NCAA down to receive it directly?

Dec 03, 2017 02:52 PM #48

@Bwag both have institution codes you can put down when you sign up for the test where they’ll get the score when the student does.

Dec 03, 2017 04:55 PM #49

What we know so far. DeSousa, because of when he started school in his native country, is eligible to apply for admission to KU. The school has rules for admission but also has a wide latitude to override said rules and admit the candidate on a hardship basis. No problem there.

DeSousa needs to cleared by the NCAA to play sports at KU and it has fairly strict rules and, as I understand, very little leeway. DeSousa took one of the required tests (name is not important) and apparently did not score high enough to qualify, whether it was to validate grades or show college aptitude is again, irrelevant. The bottom line is he apparently did nor score high enough. Problem here.

DeSousa took the test again with the hope the second time around he will score higher and qualify and it will take at least a couple of weeks to know the results. Based on the test results he will either come to KU and be eligible to join the team and play, come to KU and not be eligible to play and just get a head start on academics and, if allowed, practice with the team or just stay at his prep school the rest of the academic year.

I am not sure if KU/NCAA can request an expedited release of the test score, but until such time when the results are available, there is really nothing anyone can do or speculate on DeSousa’s situation.

Dec 04, 2017 04:09 AM #50

@JayHawkFanToo

I believe De Sousa took either the ACT or SAT test... whichever one is the basic admittance exam for KU. His score was just below qualifying. I don't think the admissions bar on this is set by the NCAA. I just think it is the standards set by the Kansas Board of Regents for admission into KU.

I could be wrong... but if this is the case, good chance De Sousa fulfills his admittance requirements on round 2!

Dec 04, 2017 05:03 AM #51

@drgnslayr KU takes both. They’d admit De Sousa in a heartbeat if he was eligible, regardless of KU’s written requirements. I believe the NCAA’s are higher.

Dec 04, 2017 05:23 AM #52

@drgnslayr

Admission to KU is dictated , well...by KU and it is free to override the rules and accept the student as a hardship case and there is nothing the NCAA or Conference can do about it. However, to be ruled eligible to play is regulated by the NCAA and the Conference and here is where the problem lays. DeSousa can be admitted to KU and not permitted to play; I believe Jamari and Ben McLemore, among others, had the same issue.

Dec 04, 2017 12:46 PM #53

If he isn't NCAA eligible I would think they'd want to have him finish at IMG so he could have all his eligibility and be ready to go first semester at KU.

Dec 04, 2017 03:28 PM #54

drgnslayr said:

@JayHawkFanToo

I believe De Sousa took either the ACT or SAT test... whichever one is the basic admittance exam for KU. His score was just below qualifying. I don't think the admissions bar on this is set by the NCAA. I just think it is the standards set by the Kansas Board of Regents for admission into KU.

I could be wrong... but if this is the case, good chance De Sousa fulfills his admittance requirements on round 2!

I can't find the article now but one I read had an explanation that made some sense to me. It boiled down to that the score he needs isn't necessarily for admittance to KU but it is to show he has learned the material that on record he has been taught to allow his transcripts to be accepted by the NCAA. So if he has on his HS transcripts he has studied Quantum Physics (ok so maybe a poor example) his ACT/SAT test score should reflect that he has a reasonable amount of knowledge in that field. Basically it is a down and dirty way to double check transcripts from schools, and along the way makes sure the student paid attention to the class.

My question is do they do this from athletes from all schools or only ones not accredited in the US?

Dec 04, 2017 03:57 PM #55

@Kubie

All foreign records require several levels of certification before they get to the NCAA. Locally, all non-accredited school and the so called ā€œbasketball factoriesā€ or sports prep schools that are in the NCAA ā€œwatch listā€ also receive addional scrutiny because the education they provide many times does not meet even the minimum standards for core subject that is very low. Applicants from most accredited public schools or quality private schools, such as most of the Catholics HS, that have completed the core requirements sail through the process without a hitch.

I posted the number before during the Diallo fiasco and if I recall correctly, the NCAA processes all over 100,000 applications per year and only a tiny fraction of those get the ā€œDialloā€ type of delay. In DeSousa’s case the issue seems fairly simple, his required test score is not high enough. He can either retake the test like he is doing or do remedial work for one year (Jamari, McLemore) before becoming eligible.

Dec 04, 2017 04:48 PM #56

@JayHawkFanToo Don't remind me of the Diallo stuff -- I never again want to post about NCAA portholes, or links to a school's curriculum, and what the NCAA has flagged as class that doesn't comply. Ugh.

Dec 04, 2017 05:53 PM #57

If Cunliffe is the only mid-season eligible player to play coming up man that's going to be some depressing crap!

All that anticipation for Preston and then De Sousa and then nothing?? Obviously we expect both situations to have clarity and positive outcomes. Waiting sucks

Dec 04, 2017 05:55 PM #58

If it's just Cunliffe it's really going to be a battle all year. Not every coach will be as dumb as Boeheim if and when Clay Young goes out there.

Dec 04, 2017 05:57 PM #59

BShark said:

If it's just Cunliffe it's really going to be a battle all year. Not every coach will be as dumb as Boeheim if and when Clay Young goes out there.

At least we'll have 5 more fouls with Cunliffe. Taller, athletic. Self will have to get creative with Marcus and Sam

Dec 04, 2017 06:09 PM #60

Yeah, I'll take Billy please!

Dec 04, 2017 06:29 PM #61

@Kubie

Athletes still have to clear the same admission bar that all other students have to clear.

ACT/SAT scores are part of the equation for admission.

Dec 04, 2017 06:32 PM #62

I believe the minimum acceptable ACT score is a 16 which is really bad. You get a 10 just for putting your name on the form...

Dec 04, 2017 06:41 PM #63

Even if Preston was eligible, it is shocking how thin we are in the post. We have a pretend PF in Lightfoot as a back up, and that's it. We relied on three transfers for possible depth and they all bolted -- Evan Maxwell, Jack Whitman, and Dwight Coleby.

We don't talk about it a lot, because we love to praise Bill Self -- but, as of now, this is a huge failure by coach Self. Perhaps one of the biggest of this tenure at KU. Leaving us this dangerously thin.

But failure is of course dependent on failure on the court. We're 7-0. There's no failure there. And it can only fairly be judged at the end of the season.

Dec 04, 2017 07:24 PM #64

@HighEliteMajor

There are things that are well beyond the coaching staff control. Once Preston signed other players saw too much competition and bolted and had Preston not signed I would think KU had other prospects that might have signed instead.

If I recall correctly, there was a concern about Preston clearing the NCAA and who would have thought that after he was cleared an unrelated issue like this would surface? Should KU run background checks on prospects, families and friends and hire PIs to do further digging? I think not. With Preston playing there are no issues. Can't really blame Coach Self for this particular issue.

Dec 04, 2017 07:34 PM #65

@JayHawkFanToo First, I'm making my criticism even assuming we have Preston, as I had noted. Even with Preston, we are still dangerously thin. Preston's issues could just as easily be a broken ankle, or other injury. Or it could be an injury to Doke. With Preston, we were dangerously thin.

I really disagree on the "can't really blame Coach Self for this particular issue." This is right at his doorstep. It's his job. Self did not recruit and secure non-transfers to be foundational players. He relied upon the ever tenuous transfer players. Further, Bill Self made the choice on the three transfers that bolted. He failed on all three counts as all three turned out to be unreliable. The results (just as win-losses, etc., do) bear that out.

I think the Preston issue is a good distinction. Assuming of course Self had no inkling on Preston's issues, this is much different than the Diallo academic mess. Diallo was buyer beware. No one rational would have simply assumed eligibility given that mess. It was a reasonable gamble given the late signing (Diallo). Preston appears, as you say, to be a surprise. You can't really hire PIs.

Dec 04, 2017 07:45 PM #66

@HighEliteMajor

Again, you cannot place an order for the ideal transfer players, you have to take from what is available and the ones he got were coveted transfers. Coleby played well below expectation last season and there was no indication of improvement like we have seen as his new destination. He wanted and needed extended playing time if he has any hope of getting to the next levels and, if Preston is playing and the 'stache is producing, his playing time would have been very limited. It was the right move for Coleby and I don't believe there was much Coach Self could offer to keep him.

Dec 04, 2017 08:06 PM #67

@JayHawkFanToo You said, "Again, you cannot place an order for the ideal transfer players." I did not see that you said that before. But I agree.

You ignore the undeniable fact that Bill Self did not have non-transfer players on the roster in the first place. The cupboard was very bare on that count. That's Self's deal. Second, you ignore that Bill Self chose to add the transfers. His call. All fall in the category of Bill Self's fault, it's the degree of fault we're quibbling about. Of course, when things work out, it's Bill Self that gets the credit, a fact of which most rarely quarrel with, since he's the boss.

Dec 04, 2017 08:17 PM #68

No doubt we're thin because we failed in the recruiting front with Big's. We targeted a lot of guys we probably had no chance in landing. There might have been a few we should have landed (ala Ayton) along the way.

Whatever the case may be we might not have the offense we have currently if we didn't miss on post players and adapt our team to a perimeter attack. Winning cures everything and so far winning is all we know.

Next year we shouldn't have that issue. Heck we might get rid of the issue coming up if things fall our way

Dec 05, 2017 12:02 AM #69

Well, even if he eventually gets cleared, I am mighty disgruntled regarding B. Preston, his placing the program under the microscope of those who investigate or bray, IMPROPRIETY. Leaves us to wonder if the coaching staff actually took another gamble on a BIG with baggage. Or maybe the Preston clan was just careless with the rules? A sad first semester scenario, whatever. In an ideal world, Doke stays for another season; Preston departs as an NBA gamble.
Even if he roars onto the court as a springtime savior in key survival contests, I am not likely to work up enthusiasm for Billy the Jayhawk. No, I really don't KNOW HIM.

Dec 05, 2017 12:27 AM #70

@HighEliteMajor

I don't believe the transfer were his first choice but what was available at the time. As good a program as KU is, it is hard to compete with the programs on the Coasts, particularly the East Coast that gets all the hype or the West Coast with the California glamour. In comparison, small Mid West towns are pretty boring and not really attractive to the urban prospects; by and large Coach Self has really done well . If recruiting to KU with its history and tradition and proximity to KC is hard, imagine what it must be like to recruit to Manhattan, Kansas. Just sayin'...

Dec 05, 2017 02:01 AM #71

@HighEliteMajor So, has he failed? If he had a few Jamaris on the bench, maybe he doesn't go 4 out. Maybe the Preston suspension is a blessing in disguise because it forces Doke not to hack away. It also forces us to play faster, pass the ball around, and find the open man instead of the point guard making an entry pass into the post while the rest of the team stands around like we saw for years. Nothing screams "exciting ball" like feeding Landen, and watching him flop around trying to score. Not for me, man. Whip that ball to all 4 corners, and one of our guns is gonna get open.

You label the transfers as a "failure"without realizing the chief problem we have this year is our chief strength next year. The difference is this year we have the incredible DG, Vick, and Svi to go along with a 7 foot man beast that is itching to eat the rim. We are oozing with experience this year. Next year, we'll have practically no experience except for the transfers. We will need them badly next year. When Preston gets activated, our depth increases. If DeSousa or Sosinki can come in and help, then we can at least field a competent stable of bigs. We don't have to have the best bigs to win playing 4 out. Start DG/Newman or Cunliffe, Vick, Svi, and start with Doke, then Billy, then whoever's left. This team is really special in my mind due to the fact they have the lack of depth, and they know they have to overcome it.

Dec 05, 2017 02:38 AM #72

@KUSTEVE the D is also better than last year. We are sitting at third in defense field goal %.

Dec 05, 2017 03:47 AM #73

@KUSTEVE I think by Traylor's senior season, Self figured out exactly what you've mentioned --- play a system to fit your talent. But then again, those were our discussion points right here, before Self did what you are praising.

I have confidence now that if we had Traylor as another big right now, Self would play just as he is now, to his perimeter strength.

And there is no dressing it up -- Self failed bigtime when it came to our post depth. No one's perfect.

Dec 05, 2017 03:53 AM #74

@HighEliteMajor After 7 games, you're right. After 14 games, I think you'll be wrong.

Dec 05, 2017 01:12 PM #75

@HighEliteMajor As you say, ultimately everything falls on the coach. But...who could have predicted that Whitman would leave and Billy would have eligibility issues? Should we have one more big guy on the bench? Yes, one more reserve big guy would have been nice. The fact that the Lawsons are sitting there ready for next year probably didn't help. It would be good to know what happened with Whitman. But to your point.....recruiting a Whitman, who ultimately didn't stay for whatever reason..........yes that is on Self.

Dec 05, 2017 01:21 PM #76

Did someone mention Jamari??
I’m liking this post more and more šŸ˜€

Wish we had him now...

I suppose the one of lessons learned with transfers is that the hope of perceived playing time is the biggest reason they went to the trouble of transferring balanced with going to a better program to get better coaching and better competition.
But the three guys mentioned surely knew they were off the bench- level guys at an elite program like Kansas? What the hell were they expecting? I doubt they were misled as to playing time. this is Kansas baby. You earn it on a guaranteed top 20 team.
Well, right now at least one of them would be on the court a lot right now for the number 2 team in the country because of the Preston situation

Honestly I love the fact that Self is actively exploiting the current wealth of transfers out there.. smart move since we don’t seem to be able to coax enough top 25 bigs to come here. Recruiting is tough unless you are Kensucky or Dook or NC

Hunter M is I suppose a classic example of a transfer taking a gamble (trying to earn playing time on a super competitive high profile team) ... sadly he rode the pine pretty much. And would his pro career been different had he gone somewhere else and played more?? (I believe he’s playing in Poland now)...
I doubt it. He learned a Lot here about how to become a better player, and for the rest of his life he can say he played with the Kansas men’s basketball team in Allen Fieldhouse.

Dec 05, 2017 01:51 PM #77

@Hawk8086 My criticism assumes Preston in the fold. You ask, who could have predicted that Whitman would leave? The only person paid to make the prediction is Bill Self. It's similar to the fact that we like to give him credit for our team making shots, but we don't want to criticize when our team doesn't make shots (I find that always entertaining, because the logic, or lack of it, then diminishes his actual coaching impact; for if all that is necessary is to make shots, then why have a coach?). If you look at our rosters in the past, three post players is way, way low (Doke, Preston, Lightfoot). Self managed the roster in a way where three scholarships are taken up by transfers sitting on the bench (Lawsons + Moore). Again, that's his call. It is not unreasonable to assume that a player might get hurt (which is akin to the Preston situation now). Self gambled on transfers and lost. That's all. It seems pretty easy to accept that he shoulders the blame for our roster predicament .. given, of course, that's he's in charge of the roster.

All of that without one ounce of criticism regarding the Preston garbage.

Back to your question of who could have assumed that Whitman would leave? I could have. So could most of us here. I would assume that every player, regardless of any promises or commitments, could and might leave. If found it a bit comical when so many, with such certainty, said that Newman would not turn pro after a redshirt season because of a promise to Bill Self. They didn't know. They were believing someone's word. The fact that Newman did not turn pro does not make the consideration that someone might not keep their word incorrect. Particularly from someone, his dad, who days before he transferred said he was staying. And a reputation as a "me first" player. In fact, it would be flat stupid not to consider that Newman might not have kept his word.

In any business, you have to anticipate and play out the options before they happen. That's Bill Self's job when it comes to roster management. One comment was that it only made sense that Coleby would leave, given the way playing time was shaping up. Ok, then, that is not obvious to the boss?

Again, Self gambled and the roster juggling didn't work out as he wanted.

With transfers, players who have already shown that they will leave a school, I think the concern about them leaving is significantly heightened vs. other recruited players. And he whiffed on the three transfers. That's part of the game. You make incorrect judgments (or judgments that are on their face, correct, but prove out to be incorrect) here and there, in every business.

We should remember, as well, that an important Bill Self recruit left the program (Carlton Bragg). Who makes that judgment call on signing him, and assessing him for the program? The point is just that the buck stops somewhere, right? Just like it does with wins and successes.

We (all of us) love to exonerate Bill Self on failures, but hypocritically praise him for every success. Truth is, he bears the criticism for program failures and deserves all the credit for successes. He's the boss.

The truth is, as well, that his failures are far, far outweighed by the the successes and the extremely impressive way he handles the program. An ounce of criticism here and there should not offend. And @Hawk8086, I know you're not offended, you just opened the door.

Dec 05, 2017 02:09 PM #78

Whitman left us with little chance of replacing him especially when you don't even make it out of the summer before leaving. Timing was key with him. Of course, taking Whitman in the first place was a gamble. Why did we have to gamble on a 5th year transfer to be a rotation piece. Why couldn't we have found someone earlier? We could have pushed for another fall commitment but we didn't. We left ourselves scrambling for spring scraps. We had a reputation for recruiting slow in the fall. 2018 class is a change from that. 2019 could be as well if reports are true about the staff changing things up.

Why did Coleby up and leave?

Why was Maxwell even on the team and then all of a sudden vanished? His exile opened up the door for Sam Cunliffe who's still a major TBD.. At least he gives us a 6th guard to use in our 4-1.

I hope the revolving door of taking in transfer post players is over. We should be able to recruit starters and rotation/development pieces at KU in the post. The Lawsons we hope work out. They bring a ton of experience and talent but we've seen them making headlines before playing a game. Suspensions, drama back home, maturity issues exist with them. So the door is open that they become just like Whitman, Coleby, Maxwell instead of a Tarik Black. We'll certainly see.

Dec 05, 2017 03:28 PM #79

It all comes down to two injuries, Doke's wrist and Coleby's knee. The first left him a year behind in game experience and in learning post movement, the latter left Coleby more than a year behind and unable to perform in his one year here at the level of which he was capable.

Those factors led staff to scramble for stopgap players to supplement 5-star Billy coming in. The stopgaps got discouraged by ML's improvement and potential as a 4-year player so they left, as did Coleby, when they saw that they were going to be sharing too little time in their final years.

So, it is obvious that Bill Self is to blame for the injuries in addition to not being able to read everybody's minds.

I still blame the Chiefs' coaching staff for Derrick Thomas's car crash and later death in the hospital, due ultimately to not wearing his seatbelt in snow and ice. They should have known he was a risk-taker.

Same with Yordano and the Royals.

All coaching staffs are always to blame for anything that goes wrong, no matter how surprising to the world at large. And anyone who thinks otherwise is an excuse-making idiot who doesn't understand coaches are paid to take the blame.

Heee! Heeee! Heee!

Dec 05, 2017 03:34 PM #80

I love that Bill Self is being blamed for tuning out a roster devoid of post talent and yet his team is playing the best basketball in the nation, undefeated, and ranked #2.

The warts will show, but Bill is doing a masterful job once again.

Dec 05, 2017 03:45 PM #81

@dylans This is fun! Fire Bill Self--Hire The Psychic Network for recruiting instead!

Dec 05, 2017 03:51 PM #82

@BeddieKU23

Kind of makes me wonder....

Are small players smarter than big players?

I know... it is a generalization.

But it seems we've had so much more problems with bigs than smalls.

Dec 05, 2017 03:52 PM #83

drgnslayr said:

@BeddieKU23

Kind of makes me wonder....

Are small players smarter than big players?

I know... it is a generalization.

But it seems we've had so much more problems with bigs than smalls.

Lol. Maybe they can blend in a little easier.

Dec 05, 2017 03:56 PM #84

@RockkChalkk no!

Dec 05, 2017 03:57 PM #85

@drgnslayr This is the more fun version of that list. Since I’ve been watching KU play:

First it’s Ostertag taking on a water slide... The slide won taking two of the big 00’s teeth.

Then Pollard shows up with his painted fingernails and mutton chops. What a trouble maker! Lol

TJ Pugh. That guy could crack up a classroom with a sly remark. Very disruptive.

Moody...what more do I have to say? Trouble from day one. A walk-on starting?!? Gangster!

Sasha Kauhn I once heard that guy got a b in C++ but it was just a nasty rumor.

Dec 05, 2017 04:17 PM #86

@HighEliteMajor Nope. Not offended in the least. I was forgetting about Bragg completely.......sheesh. Sure it is ultimately on Self. I was recognizing that in my last sentence regarding Whitman......his transfer, ultimately, put us in the place we are at more than anything else. Doke, Preston, Whitman, Lightfoot......doable. But no margin for error........for sure.

Dec 05, 2017 05:18 PM #87

We (all of us) love to exonerate Bill Self on failures, but hypocritically praise him for every success.

I've been called worse than a hypocrite. I'll wear your assessment with honor.

Dec 05, 2017 05:48 PM #88

BeddieKU23 said:

Whitman left us with little chance of replacing him especially when you don't even make it out of the summer before leaving. Timing was key with him. Of course, taking Whitman in the first place was a gamble. Why did we have to gamble on a 5th year transfer to be a rotation piece. Why couldn't we have found someone earlier? We could have pushed for another fall commitment but we didn't. We left ourselves scrambling for spring scraps. We had a reputation for recruiting slow in the fall. 2018 class is a change from that. 2019 could be as well if reports are true about the staff changing things up.

Why did Coleby up and leave?

Why was Maxwell even on the team and then all of a sudden vanished? His exile opened up the door for Sam Cunliffe who's still a major TBD.. At least he gives us a 6th guard to use in our 4-1.

I hope the revolving door of taking in transfer post players is over. We should be able to recruit starters and rotation/development pieces at KU in the post. The Lawsons we hope work out. They bring a ton of experience and talent but we've seen them making headlines before playing a game. Suspensions, drama back home, maturity issues exist with them. So the door is open that they become just like Whitman, Coleby, Maxwell instead of a Tarik Black. We'll certainly see.

Maxwell and Whitman even being taken were great mysteries. It makes a little more sense with Whitman because at that point Self just wanted a warm body. Then the reports were Whitman was behind Mitch. Yeesh, no wonder he left.

Getting a second post commitment last fall was probably close to impossible. Of course now it appears that there is a clear path to playing time. Last fall however KU had 6 yes 6 post players possibly (likely even) on the team for this year. Maxwell, Lightfoot, Coleby, Bragg, Doke and Billy. That's crowded even if recruits were assuming Bragg would go. The other 5 were locked in for all intents and purposes.

I'd say we should be looking at some post stability going forward but with the way things have gone the last few years, that would just feel like a hard jinx at this point.

Dec 05, 2017 06:09 PM #89

I forgot what they looked like, moustache?

Dec 05, 2017 06:17 PM #90

@HighEliteMajor

You seem to forget that Whitman and Maxwell were non-controversial and highly coveted transfers at that time and also, they were not brought in to be starters but only as a stop gag measure; most graduate transfers are . I am sure they were aware of this and hard to blame Coach Self for them or Coleby leaving. I seem to remember a considerably more controversial transfer that worked out pretty well, Tarik Black, who many thought should not have been offered a place at KU in the first place. It is the nature of the beast.

You also indicate that Coach Self wasted scholarships on transfer that are sitting this season that could have been used on other players. Keep in mind that that KU DOES HAVE a scholarship available and the Lawsons and Moore did not take scholarships that would be needed this season; there are only so many quality players available and none that would come to KU.

Dec 05, 2017 06:20 PM #91

@BShark

A few things. I agree the situations with Maxwell and Whitman were bizarre. Maxwell ended up in some banjo bible club and Whitman has apparently fallen off into Witness protection. It's always interesting to see where guys land after they leave KU. It looks bad when you look back on it.

The Bragg situation definitely is a black hole in this whole thing. We've seen a lot of snowball effect since. From Ayton going to Zona, to getting Billy to Maxwell leaving, to Bragg being forced out, to Coleby leaving, to Whitman joining and leaving and now Preston's current situation. That's a lot of bodies in and out from one position group in a single year.

2018 and beyond feels like it will be an over-correction to the issue at hand. It helps when you can present recruits playing time especially in today's recruiting. Will we run into similar issues going forward if we don't have immediate PT to offer these big guys? Will we be more selective of who we actually go after? I think its been a bit sloppy to target what we have recently. Maybe going forward the staff is more selective in who they target and potentially get.

Dec 05, 2017 06:21 PM #92

@JayHawkFanToo they were highly coveted?

Dec 05, 2017 06:22 PM #93

Highly coveted by who? That's revisionist history at its finest.

Also Evan was not a grad transfer.

Tarik was a top 60 player coming out of HS, so the talent was there. Maxwell and Whitman were simply bad takes.

Dec 05, 2017 06:39 PM #94

BeddieKU23 said:

@BShark

A few things. I agree the situations with Maxwell and Whitman were bizarre. Maxwell ended up in some banjo bible club and Whitman has apparently fallen off into Witness protection. It's always interesting to see where guys land after they leave KU. It looks bad when you look back on it.

The Bragg situation definitely is a black hole in this whole thing. We've seen a lot of snowball effect since. From Ayton going to Zona, to getting Billy to Maxwell leaving, to Bragg being forced out, to Coleby leaving, to Whitman joining and leaving and now Preston's current situation. That's a lot of bodies in and out from one position group in a single year.

2018 and beyond feels like it will be an over-correction to the issue at hand. It helps when you can present recruits playing time especially in today's recruiting. Will we run into similar issues going forward if we don't have immediate PT to offer these big guys? Will we be more selective of who we actually go after? I think its been a bit sloppy to target what we have recently. Maybe going forward the staff is more selective in who they target and potentially get.

Generally when players transfer from KU under they don't have a ton of success. AWIII and Milton Doyle are the exceptions. Frankamp has been decent but nothing special at WSU.

Bragg was a tough one. No negative stuff on him coming out of HS and he really looked like a good fit. Bad combination of his own personal vices and Self ruining him a bit. Yes I'm putting some blame on Self here. I know some won't want to hear it but it's true. Self figured it out with Perry eventually, so it's disappointing that he tried to play Bragg out of position.

So I don't think Bragg was a poor target/take, it just didn't work out.

I've thought for awhile the staff needs to trust their own evaluations and not just chase recruiting service rankings. I think we are heading in the right direction based on recent results but the sample size is small.

Dec 05, 2017 06:42 PM #95

@Crimsonorblue22

Several major programs with available scholarships in need of bigs were after them. Not all that uncommon since at that stage of the recruiting process when all the traditional prospects are taken you either pick up a player that might contribute some without having to sit and will be gone after one year or let the scholarship go to waste. Transfers are very popular now and graduate transfers able to play immediately are at the top of the list. Ten years ago there were 200 transfers and now is well over 700, that is 2 for every team or 15% of all players in Division I.

Dec 05, 2017 06:54 PM #96

@JayHawkFanToo Link/source please. I know UNC was briefly interested in Whitman then said no. That's about it.

Dec 05, 2017 06:54 PM #97

@BShark

GIYF.

Dec 05, 2017 06:55 PM #98

JayHawkFanToo said:

@BShark

GIYF.

I posit that you are lying. No one else went after Maxwell. Not sure he had another place he could have actually landed at. Many people thought it was baffling at the time and he wasn't a KU level player.

I know some fluff piece from a KU slanted source mentioned Arizona, but no way could he have ended up there.

Dec 05, 2017 07:01 PM #99

Either way KU was supremely desperate and/or mis-evaluated both. Neither is a good look. Mis-evaluation would be worse however...

Dec 05, 2017 07:12 PM #100

Newman, Moore and the Lawsons are examples of the other end of the spectrum where we know other schools wanted them because people from other schools actually said as much. Illinois definitely wanted Moore, for example.

I'll be done with this now, I got a bit prickly. :/

Dec 05, 2017 07:13 PM #101

BShark said:

JayHawkFanToo said:

@BShark

GIYF.

I posit that you are lying. No one else went after Maxwell. Not sure he had another place he could have actually landed at. Many people thought it was baffling at the time and he wasn't a KU level player.

I know some fluff piece from a KU slanted source mentioned Arizona, but no way could he have ended up there.

Calling another poster a liar is way out of bounds.

Here is a link to the transfer ↗ that lists Virginia Tech, Baylor, Arizona and Cincinnati as pursuing him. Apology?

Dec 05, 2017 07:26 PM #102

@JayHawkFanToo I admit I handled that poorly because I was told to google it when I already had looked into it at the time, because I was baffled by the take. So I'm sorry for calling you a liar, though I do think you are incorrect that he was highly coveted. I suppose I'm back into this now so...

I already mentioned that article. Pursued by is loose and vague. Didn't see anything from an Arizona source saying they were interested (and yes I looked). It looks good for KU to "beat" Arizona. I think the other actual players involved were the likes of Baylor and La Salle, maybe Cincinatti. La Salle definitely wanted him though that isn't cited in the article because well that doesn't look as good, recruiting against La Salle.

Dec 05, 2017 07:41 PM #103

@BShark

Here is from the horse's mouth ↗ mentioning the visits he made and the ones he cancelled after selecting KU.

Dec 05, 2017 07:44 PM #104

@BShark Where did the Hutch Juco kid, Juiston, fit in the recruiting scenario? Was it because he did not see much playing time next year? Sure would like to have him right now. Kid can ball!!

Dec 05, 2017 07:57 PM #105

@Big-Clyde52 it looks like the Lawsons made him reconsider.

Dec 05, 2017 08:01 PM #106

@Big-Clyde52 I wanted him! Watched the unlv az game.

Dec 05, 2017 08:09 PM #107

@Crimsonorblue22

You called it from the beginning. :smile: He would have been huge this year.

Dec 05, 2017 08:25 PM #108

Juiston is really good. Saw the Zona game as well. wow

Dec 05, 2017 08:26 PM #109

@BeddieKU23 Self would love him!

Dec 05, 2017 09:09 PM #110

@JayHawkFanToo Yeah watched that game also. Made me also wonder about Ayton. Since Zona is a part of the FBI probe, and many of the CB's had him as a lock for KU. Then all of a sudden he chooses Zona in the end. Sounds and looks a little fishy to me. Just imagine Doke and Ayton on this KU team. Wondering????

Dec 05, 2017 09:47 PM #111

@Big-Clyde52 Well @dylans already covered it but yes when KU took the Lawsons his interest in KU cooled. Juiston had two years to consider and he knew he wouldn't start ahead of Dedric his last year. Hard to blame the kid, as of course he has his professional future to think about so it makes sense he would want to be showcased.

I was on the same page with @Crimsonorblue22 in thinking his game would translate to the D1 level. You never know with JUCOs but he has a lot of things you can't teach.

@JayHawkFanToo Fair enough. Kids claim offers and interest they don't have all the time* (it's worse in football but still) which is why I like to see what people from the actual schools are saying. I'm pretty sure he could not have transferred to Arizona but at the end of the day only the Arizona staff and Maxwell know the truth.

*It actually happened last recruiting cycle with Andre Rafus. He kept KU on his list and claimed an offer but he was never seriously recruited by KU.

Dec 05, 2017 10:18 PM #112

@BShark

A little more serious when they visit or schedule visits to schools, wouldn't you agree? On paper the kid was good and had 2 years of eligibility to boot; more than a one year bench warmer.

Dec 05, 2017 10:34 PM #113

@Big-Clyde52

Until the very end Ayton was 100% KU. Hard to believe something did not happen to change that.

Dec 11, 2017 01:32 PM #114

Sounds like the test scores might be in

SD2TWO (@SilvioDeSousa5) tweeted at 6:11 AM on Mon, Dec 11, 2017:
Imma be there sooner than u thought ����������
(?s=09)

Dec 11, 2017 01:47 PM #115

@3genhawk yessss

Dec 11, 2017 01:59 PM #116

Was just hopping on to post this. Sounds like great news.

Dec 11, 2017 02:25 PM #117

Holy cow!

We live in an age of fake MSM news, NEAR DAILY MSM scoops against the President retracted in hours, UNVERIFIABLE leaks, EMAIL dumps, bizarrely worded tweets, and ANONYMOUS internet tips about politics in the swamp.

Now an anonymous tip KU basketball might get a desperately needed big sooner than expected?

OMG!

ā€œI want to believe, Sculley!!ā€

But...

All SIGINT suspect right now. Stop.

Steady as she goes. Stop. Continue all possible repairs en route to Pearl for emergency refit during Holiday break. Stop.

Dec 11, 2017 03:38 PM #118

@3genhawk I sent him a tweet. It's my first one ever.

Dec 11, 2017 04:56 PM #119

This would be some really good news for a change.

Ok so let me just throw this out though. - - Tell me my friends, are we as fans super excited for the strong possibility of him coming early BECAUSE - -he can actually benefit us on the floor a lot - - OR are we glad to see him come for an extra body? - - purely depth issues?

I am of the believe of both scenario's. - -One we could sure use the depth/bodies. - BUT also I truly believe he can help on the floor, the only thing is I hope fans don't expect him to be superman - -life savior. expect more then what he is going to be able to do for us for awhile,- -It is going to take some time for him to get situated /learn.

Hopefully we will find out something this week for sure. MAN , I would be great if it turned out if we could get Billy back soon AND De-Sousa. - I think it would make a world of difference. - - ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY

Dec 11, 2017 05:03 PM #120

Well I hope he can help. I'm worried that he will be so far behind that he might not be any better than Mitch. But if he is a quick learner, and the upperclassmen utilize that gym in the dorm to run through the playbook with him whenever they can, there is definitely some upside.

Dec 11, 2017 07:19 PM #121

Seen the box scores of two of his games this year. - -IMG beat # 4 St Johns I think it was - -he had 20 points and 14 rebounds - - -in another game this season he had a line of 28 points- - -11 rebounds - - -3 assists - - 3 blocks - -& 2 steals.

A writer poster that Silvio De-souse is a grown man and could be playing right now at Ku. - Well let's get him here quick then. - -ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY

Dec 11, 2017 09:53 PM #122

@jayballer54 Well, if he is behind in proper understanding of how to master the HCBS system, then perhaps he will come in pretty much even with the rest of the team. So, I say immediate help.

Dec 13, 2017 10:52 PM #123

Word is that test scores come in on Friday.

Dec 13, 2017 10:58 PM #124

mayjay said:

@jayballer54 Well, if he is behind in proper understanding of how to master the HCBS system, then perhaps he will come in pretty much even with the rest of the team. So, I say immediate help.

PHOF

Dec 13, 2017 11:02 PM #125

Kcmatt7 said:

Well I hope he can help. I'm worried that he will be so far behind that he might not be any better than Mitch. But if he is a quick learner, and the upperclassmen utilize that gym in the dorm to run through the playbook with him whenever they can, there is definitely some upside.

I agree that he could be no better than Lightfoot. But he will help enormously simply because he is another body that is actually a basketball player. KU needs at least a three man rotation inside to let KU's bigs play aggressively for 40 minutes in a 4-1 set, go with two bigs for short stretches as MUs require, and help us bridge through inevitable injuries and flu.