@SoftballDad2011
You know... Self's job is political. There is no way he can keep everyone happy.... perhaps even if we take home another National Championship.
We all want that big trophy in April... expectations are what rule the day. If fans don't consider it a "good year" if we don't win it all, then they are in for unhappy times almost every year. Even the Kentuckys and Dukes aren't winning it every year.
But this recruiting thing is a puzzle. After '08 I think it raised our fans expectations... and we thought we would climb to the top of the recruiting world. Calipari moving to Kentucky changed all that. Meanwhile, Duke seemed to constantly increase their recruiting classes. Now, we definitely feel like we are behind these schools (and others).
@Texas-Hawk-10 has a legitimate question about Self and Einstein's definition of insanity. In fact... one could argue that we aren't even getting the same result year-after-year. So... if a person is insane for doing the same things over and over but expecting different results (I'm guessing wanting good results) and the results are on the decline... what does that mean for this definition of insanity?
I mentioned in another post that I thought we have an identity issue. I think all of us know several reasons why we aren't landing the top tier talent right now. So... why don't we adjust our strategies and become a place welcome for OADs?
OR....
We decline the "revolving door" strategy and go for guys a step or two down. But then... why do that without a solid plan for developing players? Danny Manning is gone. Hudy is great for strength and conditioning... but who is developing these guys' game? After Manning left, what development are we selling to recruits? Why go to Kansas? I get that we are #2 (behind Kentucky) in current players in the league. But that doesn't seem to be getting guys lining up to sign with Kansas.
We have way too much to offer top recruits to not be landing top recruits. I'm pretty sure there is something GLARINGLY wrong with how we are recruiting, but the coaches don't see it because they can't see the trees while standing in the woods.
I'm involved in sales/marketing. Have been for a long time. There are different strategies available... like the "shotgun approach" where you blast away very broadly and see what comes your way. And then there is the "rifle approach" where you limit your efforts to focus on less of a crowd, but hopes that the crowd is going to give great rewards. It seems like we are trying to run both approaches at the same time. We are definitely shotgunning it... willing to sign uber elite players and guys not even ranked. Our assistants are on the recruiting trail doing both. We seem to be on a rifle approach with some OADs. Perhaps we are even dropping decent ranked guys while we go after top elites. It seems like a big hodgepodge effort. When there is this disorganization in your strategy it comes off to those you are trying to sell as desperation. I know for a fact that right now we are seen as desperate by many. And maybe we are. That creates quite a mountain to climb.
I think we have counted on getting top talent late in the game for way too long. Self has been the master at recruiting late. Getting guys that are transferring or wanting out of the LOIs, etc. In some ways, that success has masked negative issues we have with recruiting. And it all "comes to roost" when we have a year or two where we don't pull off the last second recruiting miracle. We all know how important it is to get out early in recruiting.... build momentum by getting one or more elite players early... it makes it easier to sign more on because the momentum is there. Our momentum right now is Lightfoot. How many great players is that signing going to help us with? (no offense to Lightfoot. I have high hopes for him.)