@ralster
I look at it this way...
If we have a shooter, like BG, and he is wide open from 3. Except for late game strategy where we might want to run clock... is there any reason why Self would object to him taking the shot?
Over the past 5-7 or so years I have seen a huge shift in the NBA perspective... and now it is influencing D1 more and more.
Teams used to "settle" for 3s. Now.. they "promote" for 3s, by running offense trying to open up the trey.
I noticed this a lot in the past few years with the SA Spurs, sometimes running elaborate schemes to open up the trey.
Now, Golden State will sometimes give up an uncontested dunk to throw it out for a trey shot.
I'm not sure there is so much a shift in attitudes as there is just the realization of more offense run specifically to free up the trey shot. By making that adjustment, the percentages are climbing and bean counters are going wild with this, now proclaiming the "trey offense" as the way to go.
We have experienced our guys ice cold from "bunnyland." So what risk are we taking by using an offensive scheme that frees open the trey shot? In the least, it can help open up more post scoring. Outside-in.
I think, in the past, our issue is that we always run the same set, and run options through just one set.
If we run more sets and fewer options for each one, we open up more possibilities for trey exploitation.
It didn't always work... but I am liking the use of Traylor sometimes receiving the ball in the high post and driving the ball. That seems to totally rattle defenses. Typically, there are few post players with the same quickness of Jamari. The quicker defender is over guarding Perry. I think that is the potential we can realize with a player like Jamari... and I hope, soon, we can replace some of Jamari's minutes for Cheick.