It is that time of year... when college basketball recruiting earns the spotlight ahead of the game itself.
Kansas... formerly known as "Big Man U" (when Danny Manning was an assistant), is in need of 3 or so new post replacements. At least two of those replacements should be of elite status for Kansas to maintain their current elite status in college basketball.
Early signing period is quickly approaching. And for being such an elite program, with a history of helping put bigs in the league, an offense designed to run through the post and accentuate the importance of their post players, and a history going beyond the college game and to the invention of the game, Kansas finds itself experiencing the recruitment process from the outside, instead of inside. It seems that most elite big men put Kansas on their list of possible schools, if for no other reason than window dressing and to steal any possible tiny bump from adding one more elite school to their list. But few seem to take their own list seriously.
Why would an elite program like Kansas, have trouble signing elite players? In the past, many have pointed to a lack of media attention from the East Coast as being a big factor. Arizona seems to prove there isn't much truth in that assumption.
What does appear to be related, at least when looking at Kentucky recruiting from John Calipari, is the "relational" web of Calipari's "recruiting family." This is a family. It has all the "family-iar" characteristics of an organized crime syndicate. New members are sworn to secrecy and threatened to lose their power and money-making status if they talk too much. Maybe even threatened beyond that... The example of Sonny Vaccaro is often referenced to those who may threaten to loosen their lips. Even Vaccaro wasn't "too big to fail."
The revenue streams are from two sources, both every bit as crooked as any drug trafficking syndicate. Those sources are sports shoes and sports agency. Both are rooted deeply into John Calipari's "recruiting family." And what we are learning from Nike is they maintain black market currency (non-taxed) in large slush funds that are used to grease the entire industry to keep Nike #1. If you look at how much money they "slush around" it doesn't equate to anything proportionate to their actual reported revenues. Not even close.
There is no way Kansas can compete with this. McCarthy Hall could be built from gold and diamonds. The legacy of Wilt, Dr. Naismith, all the greats... mean ZERO compared to the protection and benefits offered by "the family."
So when you are scratching your head, not understanding why a young recruit picks Kentucky over Kansas, don't get too stressed thinking the recruit thinks Kentucky is a better choice over Kansas. That isn't where Kansas loses the recruiting wars. Chances are, that kid has already established a long relationship of being in the pocket of Nike and Creative Artists Agency. You might even come to the conclusion that these kids already have a "debt" that needs to be paid back to the "family."
This is the difference for Kentucky and Calipari. This is why he can go out there and sweep up a huge chunk of all the elite talent. "Great salesman?" My ass. That is the front protecting the real structure behind Calipari and his recruiting.
And what about other schools? Does Duke and Coach K have a similar "family?" Perhaps, or perhaps not. There are several pathways that attract young players. Players' parents have a lot to do with how they are brought up and what paths they take. The story above (and link below) addresses Calipari because his recruiting is off the charts, so many people out there have been keeping their eyes open and "spilling the beans" on what they see.
Louisville's recent recruiting scandal (where prostitutes were brought in to treat recruits) is another creative tool used to get players to sign.
Check out the following link,, and you can qualify the story (somewhat) by reading the referenced links.
Are Kentucky's John Calipari and William "WorldWide Wes" Wesley Cheating the System? ↗