@KUinLA I know what Lunardi is implying by the "eye test" and it means nothing in March. Opinions are free to express. I'll say this to you and every other skeptic. Looks can be deceiving. This last game against WVU was HUGE. I think it gave this team some much needed confidence, under some extremely diverse circumstances. DO YOU HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING? Look at what this team just accomplished without Ellis or Alex. I find that extraordinary to say the least. The core of this team needed that game and to win under those circumstances are enormous.
We all know Ellis, Alex, and Oubre. Just think who won that game against WVU, to win the B12 OUTRIGHT. Incredible to me that many are automatically doubting a team that just won 11 straight titles.
You and others can doubt this team all you want. As I said, Lunardi and Greenberg may be right, BUT, they weren't suppose to win another B12 conference title either...still got doubt? Don't watch them play in the post-season.
Read the piece where all the ESPN analyst ate their crow with KU winning their 11th B12 title and admitted to doubting KU. I also understand a B12 title and a NC are two different titles. But, to say KU survived a brutal precon and conf schedule, only to fail an "eye test" is absurd and a bit condescending, and frankly disrespectful. It's the classical over done "glass half empty" crap, negative.
If you're a KU fan, you'll take all the hope and results you can get. This was huge and may be the beginning of a deep run. Who thought Napier would lead UConn? Maybe this will be the beginning of something special. Who thought Danny Manning would lead the 1988 team? How many loses did they have? They looked like this team at times and maybe worse, 1987–88 record 27–11 (9–5 Big 8 8). So, my point is, anything is possible. Let's wait until the Fat Lady sings. It's not over till it's over.