Another thing: through out my sixty plus years I have survived many better mouse trap offenses. They come along about ever 7-10 years.
There was the wing T in my fathers day balanced and unbalanced lines.
There was the T and shotgun 1.0 balanced and unbalanced lines in my brother's day.
There was the split T with single and double wide outs, or with a wing back, or a slot back in motion or not.
There were the I formations: power I, I with slot/wingback, and single or double wide outs with or without motion.
There were the shifting backfields with bobbing line men and men in motion.
There was the Wishbone triple option and the broken bone.
There was the run'n'shoot with 4 wideouts.
There were the shifting shotguns with 3 and 4 wide receivers on a side.
There were the no huddle offenses. And all the nuanced blocking schemes.
There was Packer power sweeping, and 49er ball control and quick strike Air Coryell, which was Sid Gillman on steroids.
And there is the Air Raid.
And I'm not even talking about defenses: 6-1-4, 5-2-4, 5-2 Monster, 4-3, 3-4, shooting the gaps, 7/8/9/10 man fronts, nose tackles, penetrate and hit, read and react, down defensive ends, up defensive ends, no defensive ends, middle line backers, no middle line backers, m2m/zone/hybrids, blitzes, stunts, etc.
Always it comes down to who recruits the most and the best lineman and most and best skill players regardless of the offenses and defenses. And if one team has the best material for running a wishbone the best and another team has less good material for running an Air Raid, the Wishbone prevails, and vice versa.
As my two football coaches that won titles all through six of my junior high and high school years and my class of kiddie ballers only lost 5 games in six years and won three state high school championships used to say, with the right talent, and the right execution, every play run from every offensive formation should be a touch down. The only reason it isn't is that someone messed up, or let up, or got beat, somewhere. Hence the relentless pursuit of killer instinct with perfection execution is the ultimate criterion of championship football. All offenses and all plays from those offenses, if run by the right players perfectly are unstoppable. Everyone that has ever studied football offense and defense knows it. The plays are designed that way. Even the 5 and outs over the crown of the field on the wide side, could be turned into touchdowns with the right moves.
I never saw perfection, but I saw near perfection for 6 years. Its a real thing to me. It stayed with me the rest of my life. The right people doing the right thing at the right time with nearly perfect execution can do anything.
But in my kiddie ball experiences, the coaches didn't have to recruit. They were just great coaches and had one helluva lucky run of talent.
In D1? You gotta sell. You gotta close. And you gotta do it competing against 20 teams that are already in the Top 20, because they have been selling and closing on their share of the best--enough to get to the Top 20 for 5, 10, 20, or 50 years before. Their recruiters are known commodities and their program is a known brand. Its a tough club to break into, because non of those recruiting position coaches you talk about want to make a horizontal move to come to a career boneyard, when they could stay where they are and keep getting her done. They mostly only want to make the move up to OC, or DC, or HC at a place like KU. If they are going to make a horizontal, they find a slot with an even better program than the one they are already at.
Finally, regarding Nick Saban hating to play spread offenses: Nick Saban is 108-18 at Alabama. Nick hates to play any offense with talent that overwhelms his talent in what it tries to do and executes better at doing it than his guys execute at stopping it.
I can guaranty you Nick Saban would have hated playing Barry Switzer's OU Triple Option teams the most, when Switzer was four deep at all 22 positions with guys bigger and faster than Nick's, even as much as he hates playing the Air Raid.
Nick Saban would also have hated playing USC the years it had OJ Simpson and was 3-4 deep at every position in guys that could overwhelm you athletically on both sides of the ball.
To be candid, Nick Saban hasn't had to hate playing almost anybody several of his years at Alabama, because he's has held all the aces quite a few times.
And if Nick Saban really did hate playing spread offenses the most, and hadn't figured out how to beat them, well, he would be the leading proponent of spread offenses.
When Woody Hayes held all the aces, Three Yards and a Cloud of Dust was the offense everyone hated to play.
There are soooooooooo many ways to win playing offensive football that its insane, but they all hinge on having the deepest team with the best players executing the best.
Lots of offenses are annoying and nerve wracking to play against.
And if score were kept in the game based on which offensive scheme was the most annoying, or irritating, I suspect the Air Raid, the Triple Option and Three Yards and a Cloud of Dust would be up there as all time winners.
But the all time winner in football, same as in basketball, is the team with the most great talent best suited to its offense and defense and executing the best on both sides of the ball.