I guess that makes me a doubter, which is fine. I am no less a fan, however. I love the program. I don't buy what the media is always selling. I try to observe, and then formulate my own ideas. The media have called the Big 12 the strongest conference the last 3-4 years as we send 6-7 out of 10 teams to the dance. Yet, how well have all those strong teams performed in the tournament? Oklahoma in the FF in 2016 was is the only FF since Kansas in 2012, right?
Kansas is leading this league again. The team that struggled against a Kentucky team (who I said wasn't good at that time and have finally dropped out of the top 25). They get their tails kicked by Washington at Sprint and then ASU at home. (Go check their conference record). Got their tales kicked at home by Tech who looked good and have now lost 3 of 4 and one of them to the last place team in the league. Kansas barely wins at home against an average Kansas State team (now tied for second in the league) Barely Beats Baylor at home, who is in the bottom of the league, and needed a record night on from 3 to beat Texas at home, another average team.
This Kansas team is not a great team. Yes, they can beat probably anybody on a great shooting night. But I'm also convinced they could lose to a lot of teams as well. In Self's own words, he identified this team as the team with the least margin for error as any team since he's been here. And this team is now leading this league by two games. Maybe "mediocre" was too harsh. Maybe average is better. We can call the Big 12 a strong conference all we want, but their performance in dance says otherwise year after year. Just because the league has parity, doesn't mean it has strength. I'm sure you can find every metric in the world to prove me wrong, and that's okay. The BPI, SOS, KenPoms, Sagarin, RPI, DUI, CIA, NWO, FBI....all of them probably call big 12 strong. I just don't agree.