kjayhawks said:
@Kcmatt7 LMAO!!!! Anyone thats puts Shaq in the same conversation as Wilt should be slapped, Wilt was an insane athlete, Shaq was lazy and useless more than 5 feet from the rim. Shaq is Doke(beside lazy) and Embiid is Wilt. Wilt had a very similar build to Joel and Joel is one the best players in the league today. Watching videos, I'd say Wilt is considerably better defensively. Size doesn't mean a ton to mean especially in todays game where you get a foul call for looking at someone. Jordan, Wilt and Kareem all would've averaged 5 or 6 more PPG if they played today based off of weak foul calls alone. Who are the best players in the league right now? KD- Skinny and no girth, Curry- tiny and no muscle mass, Lenard- skinny as can be but quick. Girth means nothing in todays game, even LeBron has slimmed up so he's quicker. You should watch Videos of Wilt man, he's beating guards down the floor, while Shaq walked most of the time. I gotta say the Shaq comparison maybe the stupidest comment I've ever seen on here. @Texas-Hawk-10 tried to out do you tho.
Kevin Durant - 240 lbs. Skinny.
Bill Russell - 220 lbs. One of the bigger players back then...
Jerry West - 6'2 185 lbs.
Steph Curry - 6'3 190 lbs. Tiny.
Kawhi Leonard - 6'7 230 lbs. Skinny.
Bailey Howell - 6'7 209 lbs.
I think that's all I need to say about who Wilt was going up against. It's fun to imagine him as a demi-god. But he was a man, in a game built for him, playing against 1/1000 of the competition that exists today.
I mean, literally, there are probably 100,000 more players to choose from today than there were in the 60s.
To your next point, there were more foul calls in the 60s than there are today. In fact, it was far more strict on both sides of the ball. 15 more free throws shot per game in 1960 than last year. Or, 70% more free throws per game. Which is a metric shit ton. They also scored 13% more points back in the day than they did during Shaq's time, which leads me to my next point.
Shaq's per 36, when adjusted for the era, would have lined up JUUUUST short of Wilt. Shaq even had a better FG% and FT% than Wilt did. Sure he played bully ball, but he would have still scored FG at a similar pace.
I'm not telling you Shaq was better than Wilt. But he would have put up very similar numbers had he also played in that same time period just because they were both so much bigger than anyone else playing the game at that time.