@Crimsonorblue22 said in Looking more and more like we will indeed still be adding:
So is it better to have more teams, no matter where we have to travel or add or subtract sports? Is it more money for us to add teams, no matter what? Will we get to even play them all? No in fb. Is this all about money?
The Majority IS all about Money , also think Yomark just thinking also trying to survive and stability, Like I was just saying could end up with THREE 20 team super/mega conferences no way could we play them all I dunno how that would work - -if that turns out to be the case- -your probably gonna see them try to get more team from the ACC - or Big East so teams like WV & UCF will have some teams where they don't have to travel so far. - - The want all times zones covered from coast to coast - - media exposure --more eyes on the games -- more revenue.
This is a big part of the demise of the PAC 12-- ESPN & FOX both pretty ell set with their contracts with the BIG - - SEC - - & BIG 12 - ESPN & FOX are playing hard ball with the PAC 12 not really interested.- - -That leaves the PAC trying to scrounge around and looks like if any kind of Contract it will be streaming like with Amazon, & Peacock - -THAT isn't gonna help get higher payouts or match what the Big is going to be getting. --Not getting them anymore exposure as people have to pay for the streaming --not gonna cut it.
There Schools in the PAC that believe they are done for sure and want to bail before they get left out completely. - -Again don't think it will be to long before we start hearing more about Arizona joining. - -Also if we go mega conference maybe even if we just are at 16 teams- - talk of trying to get San Diego State & possibly SMU-- to grab their media markets. - -SMU in the Dallas area and then San Diego for West Coast vieership