@DoubleDD
I think he's being for real about going small. To what extent I don't know.
Is he willing to lose defense in order to gain on offense? That's the trade-off of going small in theory. It's possible that when Bragg needs rest, Jackson slides to the 4, and either Svi or Vick come into the game. Or when Lucas needs a rest, Bragg plays the 5 and the same rotation from the wing happens.
It's quite possible that Jackson is already a better defender than Bragg is. We are just hoping Bragg is not a defensive liability, and we hope his length and athleticism bring more to the table then even a Senior Ellis could. His offense has always been ahead of his defense. Speculating that putting Jackson at the 4 with Lucas and bringing another scorer into the game would be better then bringing in Coleby or the freshman. At 6'8 and crazy athletic Jackson has the ability to be that hybrid forward that often works for other teams. In theory we shouldn't lose much, we may even be better for making such a move. Keeping Lucas on the court for his rebounding/smart defense is the smart play.
If we go small with Lucas out of the game, we'll most likely be a really athletic and fast 5 out there. I couldn't predict how well we would defend anyone but offensively we could really be lethal. This lineup could match up well with some of the Big-12 teams that will play small.