@Texas-Hawk-10 said in NCAA loses more power... again...:
@FarmerJayhawk said in NCAA loses more power... again...:
@Texas-Hawk-10 said in NCAA loses more power... again...:
@chriz said in NCAA loses more power... again...:
@Texas-Hawk-10 said in NCAA loses more power... again...:
@chriz said in NCAA loses more power... again...:
To answer your questions:
No, none of KU's issues involved NIL stuff.
No, very few people will make enough from NIL deals to want to stay in school longer. If someone is good to turn pro early, that's going to be more money than staying in school.
Someone will end up as the poster child of how not to balance academic/athletic/NIL responsibilities
Most NIL based deals will be relatively small and from local businesses. The NIL deal will have minimal impact on KU's recruiting unless the athletic department totally botches how they handle and promote NIL opportunities to kids.
I would think there’s a strong enough relationship between NIL and KU’s case that it may have some impact? E.g. If NIL existed then perhaps KU wouldn’t have done this or that (allegedly)?
Also for the marginal kids, the ones who may or may not make money by declaring, perhaps NIL would give them the incentive they needed to return?
NIL has absolutely nothing to do with KU's case. New NIL regulations won't change how Nike, Adidas, and Under Armour operate at the grassroots level funneling kids to specific programs. A $2,500 endorsement deal isn't going to stop Nike or Adidas from funneling $25,000 to a recruit's family (more money the higher ranked the recruit is).
Your second point is just flat out bad business. NIL is going to have no impact on whether a player stays or goes pro because there's no restrictions on endorsements as a pro so players would get any NIL endorsement money on top of their professional salary. If a kid chooses to return to school solely because of NIL, then that kid needs to take a financial literacy class because that kid is dumb and financially illiterate.
Depends on the specifics. If a particular booster is willing to go above and beyond any reasonable rate to retain someone, could be the case. To my knowledge, Devon Dotson doesn't have any lucrative NIL deals. Maybe on shoes? And makes ok money as a 2 way. A booster could theoretically (if NIL was passed 18 months ago) say, "yo Devon. I'll give you a $750k deal to endorse my insurance product." Total compensation would be about equal. Is this likely to happen? No. But at big time college programs like KU basketball and Nebraska football with rabid fanbases and great booster support, it's quite possible.
Your proposed scenario would likely never happen because that would be a major rules violation that could ruin a program. NIL legislation restricts athletes from signing NIL deals with companies associated with boosters so unless a school wants the NCAA handing out punishment, your proposed scenario will never happen.
It absolutely doesn't prohibit that. From the NCAA document, "12. Can individuals enter into NIL agreements with boosters?
Yes, provided the activity is in accordance with state laws and school policy, is not an impermissible inducement and it does not constitute pay-for-play."