@justanotherfan
Again, we will have to agree to disagree. In my home with or without my "guests" life goes on and it does not affect the association. The KU players are more than guest, they are more like semi-permanent residents, and more importantly, without the players THERE IS NO NCAA; the players/student athletes ARE the reason why the NCAA exists. By the way, in my association, we cannot rent our homes and only the owner or family can live in them; the association has the right to get documentation to insure the current residents are there legally.
My question is...what is the alternative? Should agents juts go around giving "loans" to families of student athletes? Doesn't UK have enough of an advantage already without unleashing WWW on the families of every All-American? They would not have 10 OADs, they would have the top 15 ranked players. every year and school bidding for players...this is what the NBA doe not the NCAA. Would these families get the same loan without a student athlete involved? Obviously not. The idea is to try to keep a level field and maintain the amateur status; once money is paid they become pros and are not eligible to play in the NCAA. There are many Olympic athletes that forfeit lucrative endorsements so they can maintain eligibility.
I am not sure why you think this is a big issue when literally tens of thousands of other student athletes and their families faithfully comply with rules the VOLUNTARILY agreed to observe without any issue, many in truly dire financial situations. Again, we all are subject to all kinds of personal intrusions in our personal lives that we voluntary agree. I see this as no different.
As I said, we obviously agree to disagree.