@HighEliteMajor
I feel your spirit... and no one can give the argument against OADs half as well as you can.
I used to be 100% on board with you on that.
I've changed my tune, largely after the last two years.
I think there is a balance of having a couple of presumed OADs. As long as the team can still be a team, and those OADs really have something to offer in their single year.
How many OADs have we had under Self?
Mmmmm.... Selby, Henry, Embiid and Wiggins... right?
Joel wasn't projected to be one and had no intent except to play basketball at Kansas.
I think we had good play from Henry and Wiggins... enough to sign them on. And Selby would have been more productive if he could have played right away and didn't get injured.
Almost everyone let us down in that Stanford game. I just posted my estimate of who let us down the most, and it wasn't from our freshmen. Wiggins did have a bad game, but we did nothing to help him out on offense. He still played the best defense in that game.
And we had the presumed OAD, Selden. He's returning, and there is nothing saying he won't return for another year or two after next. Should we have avoided Selden?
We wouldn't have won in 2008 without Rush... and we wouldn't have recruited him if we had the strict policy to avoid OADs.
In 1984, if the game had been different back then, we may not have had Manning to play 4 years and help us win a title.
In today's game, Wilt, without question, would be an OAD.
I think we just have to role with the times. Doesn't mean we have to run a puppy mill like Kentucky. We should carefully lay out a strategy on recruiting and make sure the players we do recruit want to play team ball. Wiggins and BMac may have been a bit too oriented to team and could have used a bit more selfishness.
Our best defender this year..... I'd say Wiggins, followed by Embiid.
So many of your arguments... I agree with. Yes... Kansas was a pit stop for Wiggins. Any selection he made was going to be a pit stop. But that kid is good, with potential to become a great NBA player and he'll always be a Jayhawk. Let's face it... Paul Pierce is awesome, but he's about done in the league, and the youth today have already forgotten him. HS kids aren't mimicking Pierce's game.
The final blow with me and this argument came last year. BMac was the closest player we had to being an OAD (and he wasn't). A team full of seniors... probably the best shot blocker we've had since Wilt... and we didn't even make the Final Four. How much more chemistry would it take? Our entire team had pretty much maxed out on their upside. And we still choked and made bad decisions in March.
And this year's Kentucky team was dang lucky to have made it as far as they did. The best group of recruits in a long time... they came up short, too. So I don't think going all in on OADs is a wise thing either. Plus, it drives your fan base crazy! Right now, the fans in Lexington are going absolutely nuts.
We need to be in between. This year doesn't count. We had no OADs last year, but everyone was gone. Do you really think we would have won B12 #10 with a bunch of freshmen 4-yr players?
Just admit the truth... and the truth is we all fell madly in man-love with Andrew and JoJo... now the break up time has come way too quickly, and we all ache knowing these two players best games weren't even close to what we saw in Lawrence this year!
It is a bitc# being on the beginning part of a star's upside! And when you have more than one... it just doubles in pain!
But what about the heartache of watching last year's team? All those 4 and 5 year players leaving early in March? We all endured blood, sweat and tears with those guys for half a decade and they left without advancing.... All those tough games where we were waiting for them to mature... waiting... and waiting... and having patience... and then nothing! We all play psychologist on EJ for 4 years! We all played doctor on EJ and Travis.... would they get their hop back?
Read back above... it just feels like we've been swimming in OADs. But we haven't. And I'm glad we went after all of these players, even Selby. They all showed the same respect for Kansas as our 4-year players. To me, that has to be a priority when recruiting potential OADs.
If this is all about winning in March, then consider it less about OADs or not.. and more about guard play from the PG and the 2. Those guys need to be monsters and it definitely helps if they have experience.
At the 3, you need a freak athlete who can jump out of the gym. Wiggins was perfect for that! He would have fit in well on that UCONN team.
At the 4, on a Self team, should be a beast who can score well with his back to the basket.
At the 5, we need a rim protector.
Positions 3, 4 and 5... we just need the best players we can get. Presumed OAD or not.
It is the PG where you need experience. And it helps if your 2 has experience with your 1, so they can tandem. That was UCONN's weapon.
Thanks to Tharpe, next year will remain a question mark. We were counting on him to end well this year, and he didn't. So... can we count on him his senior year?
What shoots holes in your argument is our PG play for many many years. TT in 2012 was the most recent exception. He should have visited John Lucas at least one summer earlier.
Who sparked out and cost us most in March recently? Uh... EJ and Tharpe. Neither were freshmen or presumed OADs. Go back before TT in 2012, and it was Sherron. He didn't play his best as a senior either... and we didn't advance.
I think we focus too much on this issue of OAD. We need to focus more on what it takes to play our best in March. And it starts with solid guard play from our PG and 2 (emphasis on PG). Experience does count there, unless it is some miracle kid who is the exception.
So I'm down as sort of disagreeing with your thread... but I'm giving you a FAVORITE check anyways, because you brought your A-game (and there is just so much right on info in there)!