HighEliteMajor said:
@BeddieKU23 Wow, I never heard that on Preston .. that he was never deemed eligible by the NCCA. Why would we have played him in the MU thing then? That really doesn't add up to me. Why would the car thing be used as cover? Why do we need dishonest "cover?"
I don't think KU is clear. It goes to the knowledge of the payment to Preston (his mom, or whoever). If KU coaches knew of the payment, presumably didn't tell the Administration (AD), then a question arose, everyone then did a pow wow and concluded to hold him out, and we held him out, that doesn't clear the coaches.
I will clarify what I wrote.
This is what Ryan on the Phog said about Billy. Ryan has connections to the program.
Preston was cleared academically but his amateurism wasn't.
He played in all the exhibitions because the expectation was he would be cleared by the opener to play.
The Car crash happened but it was used as a front while they waited for the NCAA to rule on his amateurism. At some point the NCAA let them know the situation and KU appealed on Billy's behalf.
Whether all of it, some of, or none of it is true it would make some sense on why there was no movement.