@Crimsonorblue22
Spot on.
Any one that thinks that KU should also KU should just shoot 3 points is an even bigger fool than what they accuse Coach Self.
What would you say if Rafael Nadal announces that he is a base line player and will not come to the net and will stay back and volley the opponent?
How about if Floyd Mayweather announces he will only jab but will not fight inside?
Or the Chiefs announce they will no longer pass and will only run the ball?
Or Cain Velasques indicates that he will only box and not grapple?
We would all agree that they went insane; being one dimensional in sports is a recipe for failure...you have to have a complete game in order to be successful; it is no different for basketball.
You cannot have one dimensional game; even when you have a great long range shooting team, you still need to have the inside game to open the outside game.
Look what happened at OSU. KU was shooting great from the outside (7 of 9) in the first half and then OSU adjusted the defense and got on the grill of the outside shooters and they could no longer score like they did in the first half (3 of 11). Its is clear that Greene is the best 3-point shooter KU has had in a long time but he is also a spot shooter that cannot create his own shot and cannot shoot when closely guarded. Perry and Oubre also will take shots only when wide open.
I see posters indicating that KU should run more plays for the outside shooters...hello, it does, but you have to consider that it is not playing the Sisters of the Poor team and the other conference teams are also capable and well coached and will have a say in how the game develops.
What Coach Self is saying is that in order to have an effective outside game, KU needs to have a credible inside threat to open the outside game. If you have the capability to score inside, the opponent cannot just concentrate on the outside and by extent it opens up the outside game. Remember Greene's comments after the OSU game?
βWhen they started pressuring us, we started our offense farther out than we wanted to. It just threw off everything. When you are able to start the offense around the three-point line, you are in scoring position. We werenβt in scoring position with our offense. They got after us and some of us got rattled.β
Having an credible inside game forces the defense stay closer to the basket and abates the problem Greene mentioned.
Interesting how the announcer are quoted saying that KU should use the outside game more but they conveniently are not quoted when they said they understood what coach Self was doing and that KU needed to develop an inside game as well.
Last night, in the first half KU was getting good looks inside and outside but were just not converting (5 of 14- 2pt and 5 of 13-3 pt) and once they started converting inside in the second half, the outside game became more open and both the inside (10 of 15) and the outside (6 of 7) benefited.
When you get a big bonus at work do you spend it all at once? Many people do, but the more fiscally prudent people will set aside some for a rainy day, This is what Coach Self is basically doing. I am sure he remembers the VCU game in 2011 when a good 3-point shooting KU team went 2-21 from 3 and lost a game it should have won. Let's face it, KU's inside game right now is not good and needs to improve and become credible threat to open up the game for the outside shooters. Abandoning the inside game makes KU a one dimensional, predictable team that becomes easier to plan for. KU needs to improve its inside game to complement and open up the outside game and it will not improve unless it is used at game time. Interesting that most are calling for more playing time for Alexander, the ultimate inside player who does the bulk of his work within 5 feet of the basket; if you want a purely outside team, then Alexander is not the answer.
Coach Self makes a lot of money doing what he does and he does it better than just about anyone else. Always get a chuckle when I see a post that says that coach Self does not know what he is doing and he is doing it all wrong bu then...they would not change him for anyone else; to me it is a lame ass excuse to try to hide a bias and dislike. If you think Coach Self does not know what he is doing or he is doing it all wrong...why, do pray tell why would you want to keep him? Wouldn't it be better to get a coach that "knows" what he is doing and does the right way? Isn't that position the ultimate oxymoron? Of course there is that pesky thing called...WINNING...that critics cannot explain.
I visit regularly on the subject of college basketball with a dozen or so people on a regular basis, about half of them KU fans and the other fans of different programs...including MU; if you live in the KC metro area, chance are that some of your friend/colleagues will be MU fans. Without exception, they all agree that most every ADs in College BBall would give his right nut...scratch that...both nuts, first born and the wife too...to have Bill Self coach his program, and they don't understand the hate and criticism he seems to get in certain circles, particularly in view of the consistent success he has had and what he has achieved not only at KU but throughout his career.
The comments above are not directed to any member in particular and there is no malice intended; they simple reflect my opinion (and frustration and that of many other people on the subject) and as such, it could be wrong. Apologies in advance to anyone that is offended by them.