@Texas-Hawk-10 said in 2020 Bubble Watch:
@FarmerJayhawk said in 2020 Bubble Watch:
@Texas-Hawk-10 said in 2020 Bubble Watch:
@FarmerJayhawk said in 2020 Bubble Watch:
I think re: winter sports you could treat them all as possible medical redshirts. If they want to come back, apply for a 5th year if they havenāt completed their season. For example, UNC did finish their year by losing in the ACC Tournament so nobody there should be eligible. Anyone whose season was cut short should he eligible and the programs should honor all signed LOIās. So for us, Doke and Moss should be eligible to come back and we should also be able to add Bryce, Tyon, Gethro, and Lattrell. I donāt think Iād be in favor of giving all winter sports SAās a redshirt for this year. The downstream effects for smaller ADās would really hurt their finances. Just limit to seniors who had their year cut short.
I still wouldn't be in favor of extending this to winter sports athletes unless they were already previously eligible for a medical redshirt. It would be too much of a logistical pain in the butt to go through every roster of every sport to determine who would be eligible for something like that. Then you'd have to find out who would take up that offer and figure out what it would do to roster and scholarship numbers. To me, it's just not worth it because then you'll also get other coaches saying why didn't "Player X" get this opportunity as well?
Winter sports are either finished or more than 75% completed and at that point, it sucks, but move on.
I donāt think it would be that difficult, honestly. Thereās not going to be many unknowns. Each AD knows who their seniors are and could apply for extra eligibility if they had games canceled. If they donāt want to come back, they can make that decision later. I think the key is just saying if youāre a senior and had games canceled you get an extra year. All signed LOIās are still valid so rosters will expand for a year. I asked my sister about this yesterday and she said they could do it in hours, especially now that they all have some extra time on their hands.
Would it be fair if KU could bring back Isaiah Moss and UNC couldn't bring back Christian Keeling simply because of the schedule of the conference tournament?
UNC's season was done and KU's wasn't because of the timing and size of the ACC and Big 12 Tournaments so is it fair to tell Keeling that he can't come back because of of UNC having an unusually bad season? What if UNC had beaten Syracuse on Wednesday? Would you give someone like Keeling a full because of missing out on likely one game?
Another issue with your scenario would be Mitch Lightfoot. How would your plan affect someone in his position? A player who redshirts what would be his senior year due to PT issues. Would he have to redshirt another season? What would happen to player at a smaller school in the same boat, but the players in front of him return to school because of your plan and now that player is still stuck without PT. Does he get to redshirt again and now miss two years of games or is that player stuck behind those other players and have to transfer out if he wants to play?
In a situation like this, it needs to be a blanket rule to me. Either everyone (all classes) are granted an extra year of eligibility or nobody is. I don't believe you can cherry pick who gets that opportunity because of scheduling which is something beyond a player's control.
I think so. UNCās season was over, so he didnāt get anything taken from him. Just use the principle that if your season was completed, you donāt get an extra year. Give Mitch a 6th year if he wants one. Heās going to get a masterās, so might as well let him finish it on scholarship.
I think thatās the case with a blanket rule anyway. If a freshman redshirted to get more playing time down the road youāve backed up his clock a year if everyone gets another year. Does he take another redshirt year?