@mayjay
But the fact that you keep repeating it doesn’t make me forget that there are probably literally dozens of lawyers in the FBI and DOJ who have approved the multistate, multiuniversity investigation and have apparently concluded there are federal laws involved here.
Are you referring to the DOJ and FBI lawyers that in one of the more important investigations in recent memory and one that involved National Security, agreed to interview the target of the investigation not under oath, with no recording of the interview made and no notes kept? Those lawyers? The ones that concluded there was no violation of law because there was no intent BEFORE interviewing the target of the investigation? Those lawyers? Show me the statute that says a law is not broken if there is no intent and try telling that to the judge next time you get a speeding ticket. You will excuse me if I don’t have much faith on those lawyers.
Now, you don’t have to be an engineer to know when a road is bad, do you? You don’t have to be a plumber or carpenter or flooring person to remodel you bathroom like you posted you did right? Likewise, any businessman has to have some business law knowledge to stay in business.
In engineering, my field, sometimes when there are large project going out to bid you will be contacted by the larger firms to team up with them, if your area of expertise is a an asset to the proposal and often you will be given a “retainer” if you agree to team up only with them, part of which is not refundable if the team is not awarded the contract and the rest is refundable or applied to actual work done. How is this different than an agent giving a player money, some of which wil be repaid and some the player will keep, with the proviso he does not deal with any other agent?
I understand you are/were a JAG lawyer and as such you acted either as prosecutor or a defense attorney for individuals assigned to you and perhaps did not deal with corporate/civilian paying clients. I will also guess that as an attorney you never had to hire one. When you talk to an attorney and you tell me what you need, the first thing he will tell you is...I need a retainer check for $xxx if you want me to do the work. Hire a contractor do to a remodeling job and he will ask for a down payment...how are these any different than an agent paying a “retainer” and or down payment? I concede that it breaks all kinds of NCAA and amateurism rules but does it break any laws? If a third party suffer financial loss the the recourse is civil court since only the state can bring criminal charges and civil court is where monetary or other loss cases end up.
P.S. BTW, I did sleep at the Holiday Inn Express. :smiley: