HighEliteMajor said:
If one cares about CBB, they would oppose such a reckless rule change.
Or all one cares about is the students who are playing the game above the product of college athletics. I could care less if a few less people watch college sports because they are mad a few more guys a season transferred. I do care that the players, who are the ones putting blood sweat and tears into this for 40+ hours a week, are given every freedom a normal person is given. They are the only ones limited by the system. Not other students. Not coaches. Not administrators. Not professors. Not referees. Not another single person involved.
And, to say that it would create complete chaos is simply untrue. Already, 40% of players transfer by the end of their sophomore year. If anything, this rule change would improve the game because we wouldn't have such a significant amount of talent sitting out each season.
If you can't get players to stay as a coach, maybe your program just sucks. Maybe your an asshole of a coach. Maybe you're a liar. Maybe you're just not a good coach and players think they can develop better somewhere else. Either way, if a coach needs "leverage" in order to keep players, than he probably sucks at his job. Hell, it's part of the reason someone like Mike Rice was able to get away with abusing players at Rutgers.
It's a dumb rule, and assuming it would create anymore chaos than exists isn't supported by anything in the real world. The average person with freedom to change jobs, literally whenever the feel like it, still stays at the same place for 4.6 years. Any logical person wouldn't transfer after their junior season because they would only be 30 credits from a degree and transferring would mean they'd have to go to school for another year without having it paid for by scholarship. So that eliminates a quarter of potential transfers.
I would LOVE to hear why you think it is so reckless to CBB though.